2017 | 6 | 1 | 31-48
Article title

Dimensions of Citizenship Policy in the Post-Yugoslav Space: Divergent Paths

Title variants
Languages of publication
The break-up of the former Yugoslavia resulted in the establishment of seven states with manifestly different citizenship regimes. Relating the politics of citizenship to the dominant nation-building projects, this paper argues that in the post-Yugoslav countries in which nation-building projects are consolidated (Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia) citizenship regimes converge around ethnic inclusiveness, while in those where nation building is contested (Macedonia and Montenegro) territorial rather than ethnic attachments are articulated in citizenship policies. In the case of Kosovo, and to a certain degree Bosnia and Herzegovina, policies emphasise territory due to international involvement in the shaping of their citizenship regimes. Even though all of these states have adopted ius sanguinis as the main mechanism of citizenship attribution at birth, the different approaches to naturalisation and dual citizenship indicate that the politics of citizenship are inextricably linked to the questions of nation building and statehood. To explore these issues, the paper first outlines the main traits of citizenship policies in contested and consolidated states. It proceeds by looking at different naturalisation requirements in the two groups of states. It argues that extension to ethnic kin occurs only in countries in which statehood and nation building are consolidated, where it serves to project an image of national unity. In states that are challenged by several competing nation-building projects, citizenship attribution through ethnic kinship is impossible due to lack of internal unity. The paper also analyses approaches to dual citizenship, identifying patterns of openness and restrictiveness. By doing so, it links the politics of citizenship to the interaction of foreign policy mechanisms in post-Yugoslav countries and identifies the points where these regimes overlap or conflict with each other.
  • Aleinikoff T. A., Klusmeyer D. (eds) (2002). Citizenship Policies for an Age of Migration. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  • Bauböck R., Perchinig B., Sievers W. (2009). Citizenship Policies in the New Europe: Expanded and Updated Edition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Becker H. S. (1996). The Epistemology of Qualitative Research, in: R. Jessor, A. Colby, R. A. Shweder (eds), Ethnography and Human Development: Context and Meaning in Social Inquiry, pp. 53–71. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Brubaker R. (1992). Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Brubaker R. (1999). The Manichean Myth: Rethinking the Distinction Between ‘Civic’ and ‘Ethnic’ Nationalism, in: H. P. Kriesi (ed.), Nation and National Identity: The European Experience in Perspective, pp. 55–73. Chur, Zürich: Verlag Ruegger.
  • Buchanan A. (1999). What’s So Special About Nations?, in: J. Couture, K. Nielsen, M. Seymour (eds), Rethinking Nationalism, pp. 283–311. New York: Routledge.
  • della Porta D., Keating M. (eds) (2008). Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dumbrava C. (2014). Nationality, Citizenship and Ethno-Cultural Belonging. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dumbrava C. (2015). Super-Foreigners and Sub-Citizens: Mapping Ethno-National Hierarchies of Foreignness and Citizenship in Europe. Ethnopolitics 14(3): 296–310.
  • Džankić J. (2015). Citizenship in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Montenegro: Effects of Statehood and Identity Challenges. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  • EUDO Citizenship (2016). Global Database on Modes of Acquisition of Citizenship. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute. Online: (accessed: 28 December 2016).
  • Hayden R. M. (1992). Constitutional Nationalism in the Formerly Yugoslav Republics. Slavic Review 51(4): 654–673.
  • Jeffers K., Honohan I., Bauböck R. (2016). How to Measure the Purposes of Citizenship Laws: Explanatory Report for the CITLAW Indicators (Version 2.0). San Domenico di Fiesole: EUDO Citizenship Observatory. Online: (accessed: 20 November 2016).
  • Joppke C. (2010). The Inevitable Lightening of Citizenship. European Journal of Sociology 51(1): 9–32.
  • Keating M., della Porta D. (2010). In Defence of Pluralism in the Social Sciences. European Political Science 9: S111–S120.
  • Kolstø P. (2014). Strategies of Symbolic Nation-Building in South Eastern Europe. Farnham, Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Koska V. (2011). The Evolution of the Croatian Citizenship Regime: From Independence to EU Integration. CITSEE Working Paper 2011/15. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Law School.
  • Krasniqi G. (2013). Overlapping Jurisdictions, Disputed Territory, Unsettled State: The Perplexing Case of Citizenship in Kosovo, in: J. Shaw, I. Štiks (eds), Citizenship After Yugoslavia, pp. 43–69. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Medved F. (2009). From Civic to Ethnic Community? The Evolution of Slovenian Citizenship, in: R. Bauböck, B. Perchinig, W. Sievers Citizenship Policies in the New Europe: Expanded and Updated Edition, pp. 305–327. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Pogonyi S., Kovács M. M., Körtvélyesi Z. (2010). The Politics of External Kin-State Citizenship in East Central Europe. San Domenico di Fiesole: EUDO Citizenship Observatory.
  • Rava N. (2010). Serbia: Elusive Citizenship in an Elusive Nation-State. CITSEE Working Papers 2010/08. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Law School.
  • Sarajlić E. (2013). Conceptualising Citizenship Regime(s) in Post-Dayton Bosnia, in: J. Shaw, I. Štiks (eds), Citizenship After Yugoslavia, pp. 69–83. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Scheppele K. L. (2004). Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction. Law and Society Review 38(3): 389–406.
  • Shachar A. (2009). The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Shachar A. (2011). Picking Winners: Olympic Citizenship and the Global Race for Talent. The Yale Law Journal 120: 2088–2139.
  • Shaw J., Štiks I. (2013). Introduction: Citizenship in the New States in South East Europe, in: J. Shaw, I. Štiks (eds), Citizenship After Yugoslavia, pp. 1–15. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Spaskovska L. (2013). The Fractured ‘We’ and the Ethnonational ‘I’: The Macedonian Citizenship Framework, in: J. Shaw, I. Štiks (eds), Citizenship After Yugoslavia, pp. 99–112. London: New York: Routledge.
  • Steinmetz G. (2005). The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences: Positivism and Its Epistemological Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Survey (2013). The Symbolic Nation-Building in the Western Balkans: Intents and Results. University of Oslo, University of Rijeka. Online: (accessed: 23 December 2016).
  • Vink M., Bauböck R. (2013). Citizenship Configurations: Analysing the Multiple Purposes of Citizenship Regimes in Europe. Comparative European Politics 11(5): 621–648.
  • Waterbury M. A. (2014). Making Citizens Beyond the Borders: Nonresident Ethnic Citizenship in Post-Communist Europe. Problems of Post-Communism 61(4): 36–49.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.