Recenzja z: M. J. Dodds (2012), Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science & Thomas Aquinas, Washington: Catholic University of America Press, ss. x + 301

• Authors: Roszak Piotr
• Languages of publication: PL
• Publisher: Science Studies Committee, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 51
• Issue: 1(203)
• Pages: 73-82

Dates

published

2015-01-15

Contributors

author

Roszak Piotr

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

References

• M. J. Dodds (2012), Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science & Thomas Aquinas, Washington: Catholic University of America Press.
• Artigas M. (2007), Ciencia y religión. Conceptos fundamentales. Pamplona: Eunsa.
• Barbour I. (2004), El encuentro entre ciencia y religión. ¿Rivales, desconocidas o compañeras de viaje? Santander: Sal Terrae.
• Carroll W. E., (2008), „Divine Agency, Contemporary Physics, and the Autonomy of Nature.” Heythrop Journal 4(49): 582–602.
• Dvořák P. (2013), „The Concurrentism of Thomas Aquinas: Divine Causation and Human Freedom.” Philosophia 41: 617–634. DOI 10.1007/s11406-013-9483-9
• Grant W.M. (2001), „Aquinas Among Libertarians and Compatibilists.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75: 221–235.
• Gustafson H. (2011), „Collapsing the Sacred and the Profane: pan-sacramental and panentheistic possibilities in Aquinas and their implications for spirituality.” The Heythrop Journal 1: 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00684.x
• Herce F. R. (2014), De la física a la mente. El proyecto fi losófi co de Roger Penrose, Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
• Jaroszyński P. (2011), Metafi zyka czy ontologia, Lublin: Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu.
• Kerr G. (2015), Aquinas’s Way to God: The Proof in De Ente et Essentia. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Marcos A. (2012), Filozofi a nauki. Nowe wymiary. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK
• Newton W. (2014), „A Case of Mistaken Identity: Aquinas’s Fifth Way and Arguments of Intelligent Design.” New Blackfriars 1059: 569-578. DOI: 10.1111/nbfr.12061
• Pieńkowski M., (2009), „Współczesne perspektywy tomizmu w dialogu z naukami przyrodniczymi.” Przegląd tomistyczny 15: 347–376.
• Sanguineti J. J. (1977), La fi losofía de la ciencia según santo Tomas, Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona.
• Silva I. (2014), „Great Minds Think (Almost) Alike: Thomas Aquinas and Alvin Plantinga on Divine Action in Nature.” Philosophia Reformata 79: 8–20. DOI: 10.1163/22116117-90000559
• Tabaczek M. (2013), „Hegel and Whitehead: In Search for Sources of Contemporary Versions of Panentheism in the Science–Theology Dialogue.” Theology and Science 2: 143–161. DOI:10.1080/14746700.2013.780432
• Vijgen J. (2007), „Did St. Thomas attribute a doctrine of divine providence to Aristotle?” Doctor Angelicus 7: 53–76.