Japan’s Approach to Retirement Reform: An International Perspective

• Authors: Higo Masa
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Over the past few decades, most countries around the world have been pressured to reform their conventional retirement systems in our time of rapid population ageing. An effective retirement reform would enable workers to remain in the workforce beyond conventional retirement age for as long as they desire, without their opportunities and decisions being institutionally constrained, so as to help them to secure resources necessary to maintain their socioeconomic wellbeing in later life. Japan deserves special attention in this context; having gone through the world’s fastest population ageing during the 1970s and 1980s, today Japan is far ahead of the rest of the world in this demographic shift. Amid aa global search for effective retirement reforms, while an increasing number of countries across the world have come to adopt an ‘age-free’ a ‘hyper-aged’ Japan has to date taken what may be referred to as an ‘age-friendly’ approach particularly in its policy efforts in the areas of mandatory retirement and public pension programs. This approach seems to have yielded a positive outcome; over the past few decades, older workers’ labor force participation rates have been steadily on the rise, and today the rates are higher than those in most other developed countries. This approach also has remained notably cautious of calling for a drastic reform, such as privatization, to the traditional public pension programs. Japan’s ‘age-friendly’ approach to retirement reform may exemplify a unique and more viable variation of retirement reforms for some other countries. Nonetheless, a continuous, closer and critical analysis of the effectiveness and long-term sustainability of Japan’s approach is called for in order for other rapidly ageing countries to examine whether it is worthwhile for them to follow in the future.

Keywords

EN

Retirement; Population Ageing; Japan; Active Ageing; Policy; Pension

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB
• Journal: EXLIBRIS Biblioteka Gerontologii Społecznej
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 1 (18) /2020 Old age - international perspective – theory and practice
• Pages: 94-104

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Higo Masa

• Kyushu University, Japan

References

• Börsch-Supan, A. (2005). From traditional DB to notional DC systems: The pension reform process in Sweden, Italy, and Germany. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2): 458-465.
• Coulmas, F. (2007). Population decline and ageing in Japan: The social consequences. New York: Routledge.
• Ebbinghaus, B. (2006). Reforming early retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Higo, M. (2013). Older worker in national contexts: A Japan-US comparison. Journal of Population Ageing, 6(4): 305-322.
• Higo, M. (2015). Experiencing mandatory retirement: The perspective of older workers in Japan. In M. Higo & T.R. Klassen (Eds.), Retirement in Japan and South Korea: The past, the present and the future of mandatory retirement (pp. 73-91). New York: Routledge.
• Higo, M. & Klassen, T.R. (2015). Retirement in Japan and Korea in an era of rapid population aging. In M. Higo & T.R. Klassen (Eds.), Retirement in Japan and South Korea: The past, the present and the future of mandatory retirement (pp. 1-29). New York: Routledge.
• Higo, M. Schröder, H., & Yamada, A. (2016). Japan: Determinants of retirement in a hyper-aged society. In D. Hofäcker, M. Hess & S. König (Eds.), Delaying retirement: Progress and challenges of active ageing in Europe, the United States and Japan (pp. 241-268). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Klassen, T.R. (2013). Retirement in Canada. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW). (2020). White paper on aging society, 2019. Tokyo: Office of Government Public Relations.
• Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW). (2018). White paper on aging society, 2017. Tokyo: Office of Government Public Relations.
• Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW). (2013). White paper on aging society, 2013. Tokyo: Office of Government Public Relations.
• Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW). (2010). White paper on aging society, 2009. Tokyo: Office of Government Public Relations.
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2020). oecd stat., labor force statistics. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Pensions outlook 2018. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2014). Pensions outlook 2014. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
• Okamoto, A. (2013). Welfare analysis of pension reforms in an ageing Japan. Japanese Economic Review, 64(4): 452-483.
• Preter, H.D., Looy, D.V., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). Individual and institutional push and pull factors as predictors of retirement timing in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(4):299–307.
• United Nations (2020). World Population Prospects 2019. Retrieved from https://population.un.org/wpp/DataQuery/
• Williamson, J.B. & Higo, M. (2009). Why Japanese workers remain in the labor force so long: Lessons for the United States? Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 24(4): 321-337.
• Williamson, J.B. (2004). Assessing the pension reform potential of a notional defined contribution pillar, International Social Security Review, 57(1): 47-64.
• Wood, A., Robertson, M. & Wintersgill, D. (2010). A comparative review of international approaches to mandatory retirement. Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report No. 674. Retrieved August 12, 2020, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214445/rrep674.pdf
• Yamada, A. & Higo, M. (2015). Mandatory retirement in Japan: An overview of the past and present. In M. Higo & T.R. Klassen (Eds.), Retirement in Japan and South Korea: The past, the present and the future of mandatory retirement (pp. 48-72). New York: Routledge.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24917/27199045.1811.8