Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2017 | 26/2 | 101-121

Article title

Predicting Definite Article Usages in New Englishes: Variety Outweighs Genre and Syntactic Function in Nigerian English


Title variants

Languages of publication



Variability in the use of the defi nite article in New Englishes, and in particular, Nigerian English has received the least attention from a quantitative, probabilistic and predictive perspective. The present study narrows this gap by not only assessing the extent to which article use in Nigerian English varies, but by also simultaneously testing out previous claims found in similar varieties, using similar corpus data from the Nigerian component of the International Corpus of English (ICE). Following theoretic framework for article use by Hawkins (1978) and Prince (1981), Wahid (2013) found that variability in defi nite article usage in New Englishes is more predictable on the basis of genre than on the basis of variety. Revising Wahid’s method and reconceptualising same theoretic frameworks of Hawkins and Prince, together with a comparable corpus sample of 8674 defi nite article the from ICE-Nigeria, the extent of article usage variability in the Nigerian variety is not only shown but also that variety outweighs genre and syntactic function predicting article usage in New Englishes.


  • Vrije Universiteit, Brussels


  • Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2016. “The Eff ects of Structure and Profi ciency on Determiner Number (Dis)agreement in Nigerian Noun Phrase.” Proceedings of the CILC2016 8th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics. Ed. Antonio Moreno Ortiz, and Chantal Perez-Hernandez. Malaga: Spanish Association for Corpus Linguistics. 1–8. http://easychair.org/publications/paper/
  • Akinlotan, Mayowa, and Alex Housen. 2017. “Noun Phrase Complexity in Nigerian English: Syntactic Function and Length Outweigh Genre in Predicting Noun Phrase Complexity.” English Today: 1–8. DOI: 10.1017/S0266078416000626.
  • Anthony, L. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/
  • Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoff rey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
  • Chesterman, Andrew. 1991. On Defi niteness: A Study with Special Reference to English and Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Christophersen, Paul. 1939. The Articles: A Study of their Theory and Use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
  • Fraurud, Karin. 1990. “Definiteness and the Processing of NPs in Natural Discourse.” Journal of Semantics 7: 395–433.
  • Görlach, Manfred. 1998. “Varieties of English World-wide: Where We Stand.” Links & Letters 5: 13 –36.
  • Goto Butler, Yoko. 2002. “Second Language Learners’ Theories on the Use of English Articles.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 451–480.
  • Gut, U. 2014. International Corpus of English (Nigeria). Online at <http://icecorpora.net/ICE/INDEX.HTM> (Accessed April 1, 2016).
  • Hawkins, John. 1978. Defi niteness and Indefi niteness. London: Croom Helm.
  • Herbelot, Aurelie, and Ann Copestake. 2009. “Annotating Genericity: How do Humans Decide? (A Case Study in Ontology Extraction).” Fruits of Empirical Linguistics. Vol. 1. Ed. Sam Featherston, and Susanne Winkler. 103–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoff rey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hundt, Marianne, Andrea Sand, and Peter Skandera. 1999. Manual to Accompany the Freiburg-Brown Corpus of American English. Freiburg: University of Freiburg.
  • Ionin, Tania. 2003. “The Interpretation of ‘the’: A New Look at Articles in L2 English.” Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Vol. 1. Ed. Barbara Beachley, Amanda Brown, and Frances Conlin. 346–357.
  • Ionin, Tania, Heejeong Ko, and Kenneth Wexler. 2004. “Article Semantics in L2- Acquisition: The Role of Specifi city.” Language Acquisition 12: 3–69.
  • Kachru, Yamuna. 2003. “On Defi nite Reference in World Englishes.” World Englishes 22: 497–510.
  • Kortmann, Bernd. 2006. “Syntactic Variation in English: A Global Perspective.” Handbook of English Linguistics. Ed. Bas Aarts, and April McMahon. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 603–624.
  • Kortmann, Bernd, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2005. “Global Synopsis: Morphological and Syntactic Variation in English.” A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax. Bernd Kortmann, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Rajend Meshtrie, and Clive Upton. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1142–1202.
  • Lamidi, M. T. 2007. “The Noun Phrase Structure in Nigerian English.” Studia Anglica Posnaniesia 42: 238–250.
  • Liu, Dilin, and Johanna L. Gleason. 2002. “Acquisition of the Article the by Nonnative Speakers of English: An Analysis of Four Non Generic Uses.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 1–26.
  • Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Defi niteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Master, Peter. 1987. “Generic the in Scientifi c American.” ESP Journal 6.3: 165–183. Nairaland Online at < http://www.nairaland.com/ (Accessed April 1, 2016).
  • Osewa, Seun. 2005. Nairaland Online at < http://www.nairaland.com/ (Accessed April 1, 2016).
  • Platt, John Talbot, Heidi Weber, Ho Mian Lian. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Poesio, Massimo, and Renata Vieira. 1998. “A Corpus-based Investigation of Definite Description Use.” Computational Linguistics 24: 183–216.
  • Prince, Ellen. 1981. “Toward a Taxonomy of Given-new Information.” Radical Pragmatics. Ed. Peter Cole. New York: Academic Press. 223–256.
  • Prince, Ellen. 1992. “The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Defi niteness, and Information Status.” Discourse Descriptions: Diverse Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text. Ed. William C. Mann, and Sandra A. Thompson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 295–325.
  • Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoff rey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
  • Sand, Andrea. 2004. “Shared Morpho-syntactic Features in Contact Varieties of English: Article Use.” World Englishes 23: 281–298.
  • Sharma, Devyani. 2005. “Language Transfer and Discourse Universals in Indian English Article Use.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 535–566.
  • Schilk, Marco, and Steff en Schaub. 2016. “Noun Phrase Complexity Across Varieties of English: Focus on Syntactic Function and Text Type.” English WorldWide 37(1): 58–85.
  • Wahid, Ridwan. 2013. “Defi nite Article Usage Across Varieties of English.” World Englishes 32 (1): 23–41.
  • White, Lydia. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.