Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


2017 | 2(16) | 34-41

Article title


Title variants

Languages of publication



The primary aim of this article is to analyze the Twitter communication strategy and its efficiency. The authors took into consideration four Ministers of foreign affairs from Great Britain, Poland, Ukraine, and Russia (their private accounts have also been examined). However, considering that Ministers of Poland and Russia did not have their own Twitter accounts (Witold Waszczykowski and Siergiej Lawrow), authors decided to analyze private accounts of Great Britain’s and Ukrainian’s Ministers (Boris Johnson and Pavlo Klimkin). All examined profiles are accredited. Because of the popularity of Twitter and the appearance of the new type of diplomacy, which involves social networking sites, the authors attempted to make a qualitative and quantitative analysis of given accounts. The results present the effectivity index and also show that spontaneously published messages on social media have a significant impact on how state institutions convey content. What is more, the qualitative and quantitative analysis and the effectivity index allows to present the tools needed for e-diplomacy on Twitter.


  • ARENDARSKA J., Elektroniczna dyplomacja - nowe narzędzia komunikowania w dyplomacji [online:June27,2017], http://oapuw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Arendarska-J-elektorniczna-dyplomacja.pdf;
  • BUD (2013) Hashtag Politics: The Polyphonic Revolution of #Twitter, vol.1., Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/pjcr/vol1/iss1/4;
  • Council of the European Union, Conclusions on electronic diplomacy [online: June 25, 2017], https://data.consil-ium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6122-2015-INIT/pl/pdf;
  • Dyplomacja elektroniczna (2015), Konkluzje Rady Unii Europejskiej w sprawie dyplomacji elektronicznej, [online:June 25, 2017] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6122-2015-INIT/pl/pdf;
  • GACKOWSKI T. (2014) Twitter w rękach polityków. Rzecz o metodologii i potencjale badań mediów społecznościowych,[in:] Gackowski T. (ed.) Media początku XXI wieku. Metodologie badań medioznawczych, vol.26.,Warszawa, Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • KUŹNIAR E., FILIMONIUK N. (2017), E-dyplomacja – jak komunikują Ministerstwa spraw zagranicznych na Twitterze? Case study na przykładzie Wielkiej Brytanii, Polski, Ukrainy i Rosji, „TH!NK” Nr 2 (28) 2017, s. 1-9.
  • LEONOWICZ-BUKAŁA I., MARTENS A. (2016), Twitter jako dziennikarska gra online – popularność kontra efektywność, czyli propozycja indeksu skuteczności graczy, [in:] Gackowski T., Brylska K. (ed.) Media początku XXI wieku, vo.30., Warszawa Uniwesytet Warszawski;
  • STATISTA (2017), Number of monthly active Twitter users worldwide from 1st quarter 2010 to 3rd quarter 2017 (in millions) [online: June 20, 2017] https://www.statista.com/statistics/282087/number-of-monthly-active-twitter-users/;
  • TWIPLOMACY (2016), The 50 Best Connected World Leaders ranking [online: June 20, 2017], http://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2017/;
  • Links to analyzed accounts:
  • https://twitter.com/foreignoffice?lang=pl
  • https://twitter.com/BorisJohnson?lang=pl
  • https://twitter.com/MSZ_RP?lang=pl
  • https://twitter.com/MFA_Ukraine?lang=pl
  • https://twitter.com/PavloKlimkin
  • https://twitter.com/mfa_russia

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.