Changing views at Banaras Hindu University on the Academic Study of Religion: A first report from an on-going research project

• Authors: Sander Åke , Cavallin Clemens , Kumar Sushil
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Given India’s vibrant religious landscape, there is a somewhat surprising paucity of depart‐ ments, centres or even programs for the academic study of religion. This article discusses this issue based on the preliminary results of an interview study conducted at Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, India, in 2014 and 20 Its focus is on the views of university teachers and researchers concerning the place, role and function of religion and religious stud‐ ies at BHU. Twenty‐eight semi‐structured interviews were conducted. In the course of their analysis, six themes emerged: 1) the place and role of religion in society; 2) religion as ‘religi‐ osity/spirituality’ or sanatana dharma vs. political ideology/communitarianism; 3) religion vs. dharma; 4) secularization; 5) religion in education in general; and, 6) religion in the education at BHU. The informants agreed on the increasing importance of religion in India, and most of them viewed the meaning of secularization as being ‘equal respect for all religions’. Moreover, a majority distinguished between ‘religion’, in the Western sense, and the Indian conception of dharma, considering it regrettable that the latter, described as the common ground of all reli‐ gions, is not taught more extensively at BHU. They also considered the original ideal of BHU’s founder, Madan Mohan Malaviya, to be of signi cant importance. That ideal involved not only teaching students the knowledge and skill sets found in a standard modern university, but also equipping them with a value‐based education, grounded upon sanatana‐dharma. As our project progresses, further understanding of this turn toward dharma education is something we intend to pursue through the lens of multiple modernities, developed by Marian Burchardt et al. as multiple secularities.

Keywords

EN

secularity; higher education; sociology of religion; Banaras Hindu University; religion vs. dharma

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii
• Journal: ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal
• Year: 2016
• Volume: Tom: 6
• Issue: Numer: 1
• Pages: 107-142

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Sander Åke

• University of Gothenburg

author

Cavallin Clemens

• University of Gothenburg

author

Kumar Sushil

• Banaras Hindu University

References

• Alles, G.D. (Ed.). (2010). Religious studies: A global view. London: Routledge.
• Ambedkar, B.R. (2002). Caste in India (pp. 83–107). In: Ghanshyam Shah (Ed.). Caste and democratic politics in India. Delhi: Permanent Black.
• Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Baird, R.D. (1991). ‘Secular state’ and the Indian constitution (pp. 141–169). In: R.D. Baird. Essays in the history of religions. New York: Peter Lang.
• Balagangadhara, S.N. (2005). ‘The heathen in his blindness’: Asia, the West, and the dynamic of religion. (2nd ed., with corrections). New Delhi: Manoharlal.
• Barrett, D., Kurian, G., & Johnson, T. (2001). World Christian encyclopedia: A comparative survey of churches and religions in the modern world. (2nd ed.). Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
• Berger, P.L. (1997). Four faces of global culture. National Interest, 49, 23–30.
• Berger, P.L. (1999). The desecularization of the world: A global overview (pp. 1–18). In: P. Berger (Ed.). The desecularization of the world resurgent religion and world politics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
• Berger, P.L., Davie, G., & Fokas, E. (2008). Religious America, secular Europe? A theme and variations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Berger, P.L. & Huntington, S.P. (Eds.). (2002). Many globalizations: Cultural diversity in the contemporary world. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Beyer, P. L. (2006). Religions in global society. London: Routledge.
• Bhargava, R. (1998). Secularism and its critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Bhargava, R. (2006a). Indian secularism. An alternative, trans‑cultural idea (pp. 285–306). In: A. Mehta & T. Pantham (Eds.). Political ideas in modern India: Thematic explorations. New Delhi: Sage.
• Bhargava, R. (2006b). The distinctiveness of Indian secularism (pp. 1–42). In: T.N. Srinivasan (Ed.). The future of secularism. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Bhargava, R. (2010). Secular state and religious education: The debate in India (pp. 248–263). In: J. Sharma & A. Raghuramaraju (Eds.). Grounding morality. London: Routledge.
• Bhargava, R. (2013). Multiple secularities and multiple secular states (pp. 17–42). In: A. Berg‑Sørensen (Ed.). Contesting secularism: Comparative perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate. Bianchi, U. (Ed.). (1994). The notion of religion in comparative research: Selected proceedings of the XVIth congress of the International Association for the History of Religions, Rome, 3rd–8th Sept. 1990. Rome: Erma di Bretschneider.
• Bird, D.L. & Smith, S.G. (Eds.). (2009). Theology and religious studies in higher education global perspectives. London: Continuum.
• Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
• Burchardt, M., Wohlrab‑Sahr, M., & Middell, M. (Eds.). (2015). Multiple secularities beyond the West: Religion and modernity in the global age. Berlin: De Gruyer.
• Burchardt, M., Wohlrab‑Sahr, M., & Wegert, U. (2013). ‘Multiple secularities’: Postcolonial variations and guiding ideas in India and South Africa. International Sociology, 28(6),612–628.
• Carman, J. (Ed.). (1967). Study of religion in Indian universities: A report of the consultation held in September, 1967. Bangalore: Bangalore Christian Institute for the Study of Religion and Society.
• Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Chattergee, P. (1994). Secularism and toleration. Economic and Political Weekly, 29(28), 1768–1777.
• Clarke, P.B. & Byrne, P. (1993). Religion defined and explained. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
• Crisp, R. & Slote, M.A. (Eds.). (1997). Virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• D’Costa, A. (Ed.). (2012). A new India? Critical reflections in the long twentieth century. London: Anthem.
• Deshpande, S. (2003). Caste inequalities in India, in contemporary India: A sociological view. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.
• Dev, S.M. (Ed.). (2015). India Development Report 2015. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Dobbelaere, K. (2008). Assessing secularization theory (pp. 229–253). In: P. Antes, A. Geertz, & R. Warne (Eds.). New approaches to the study of religion (Vol. 2). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Dubuisson, D. (2003). The western construction of religion: Myths, knowledge, and ideology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Dumont, L. (1980). Homo hierarchicus: the caste system and its implications. (Compl. rev. English ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1st ed.: 1970).
• Eisenstadt, S.N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 129(1), 1–30.
• Eisenstadt, S.N. (Ed.). (2002). Multiple modernities. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
• Eisenstadt, S.N. (2003). Comparative civilizations and multiple modernities. Leiden: Brill.
• Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The ideology of religious studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Flood, G. (1999). Beyond phenomenology: Rethinking the study of religion. London: Cassell.
• Flood, G. (2012). The importance of religion: Meaning and action in our strange world. Malden: Wiley‑Blackwell.
• Freeland, C. (2012). Plutocrats: The rise of the new global super‑rich and the fall of everyone else. London: Allen Lane.
• Galanter, M. (1999). Secularism, East and West (pp. 234–267). In: R. Bhargava (Ed.). Secularism and its critics. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Gáthy, V. & Juhos, A. (2013). The resurgence of Hindu nationalism. Piliscasba: Pázmány Péter Catholic University.
• Gill, S. (1998). Territory. In: M. Taylor (Ed.). Critical terms for religious studies. Chicago: Univeristy of Chicago Press. Retrieved from: https://btk.ppke.hu/uploads/articles/554378/file/Juhos_Anna_India_Szakdolgozat.pdf (30.05.2015).
• Grim, B. & Finke, R. (2010). The price of freedom denied: Religion persecution and conflict in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hacker, J.S. & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner‑take‑all politics: How Washington made the rich richer- and turned its back on the middle class. New York: Simon & Schustser.
• Harrison, P. (1990). ‘Religion’ and the religions in the English Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hefner, R.W. (1998). Multiple modernities: Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism in a globalizing age. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 83–104.
• Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Jadhav, N. (2012). Foreword (pp. xi–xiii). In: P.G. Altbach (Ed.). A half‑century of Indian higher education. New Delhi: Sage.
• Jaffrelot, C. (2007). The 2002 Pogrom in Gujarat: the post‑9/11 face of Hindu nationalist anti‑Muslim violence (pp. 164–182). In: J.R. Hinnells & R. King (Eds.). Religion and violence in South Asia. Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
• Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the mind of God: The global rise of religious violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Juergensmeyer, M. (2008). Global rebellion: Religious challenges to the secular state, from Christian militias to Al Qaeda. (Rev. ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Kalb, D.P. & Siebers, H. (Eds.). (2004). Globalization and development: Themes and concepts in current research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Karner, C. & Aldridge, A. (2004). Theorizing religion in a globalizing world. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 18(1–2), 5–32.
• Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the Earth? Demography and politics in twenty‑first century. London: Profile Books.
• Kumar, P. (2004). A Survey of new approaches to the Study of Religion in India: New approaches to the study of religion (pp. 127–146). In: P. Antes, A.W. Geertz, & R.R. Warne (Eds.). Regional, critical, and historical approaches (Vol. 1). Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.
• Kumar, R.P., Sangal, R., Mitra, A., Singh, N., & Karalapalem, K. (n.d.; probably 2010). An experiment on introducing human values courses in undergraduate curriculum of engineering education. Hyderabad: IIIT.
• Lambert, Y. (1999). Religion in modernity as a New Axial Age: Secularization of new religious forms?. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 303–333.
• Lash, N. (1996). The beginning and the end of ‘religion’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Llewellyn, J. (2008). Nation without a soul: Religious Studies in the Indian University. Religion of South Asia, 2(1), 7–22.
• Lorenzen, D.N. (2006). Who invented Hinduism: Essays on religion in History. New Delhi: Yoda Press.
• MacIntyre, A.C. (1985). After virtue: A study in moral theory. (2nd ed., with postscript). London: Duckworth.
• Madan, T.N. (1987). Secularism in its place. Journal of Asian Studies, 46(4), 747–759.
• Madan, T.N. (1997). Modern myths, locked minds: Secularism and fundamentalism in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• Madan, T. N. (2003). The case of India. Daedalus: On Secularism & Religion, 132(2), 62–66.
• Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Malhotra, R. (2011). Being different: An Indian challenge to western universalism. New Delhi: HarperCollins India.
• Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions, or, how European universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Matilal, B.K. (2002). The collected essays of Bimal Krishna Matilal (Vol. 2: Ethics and Epics). (J. Ganeri, Ed.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
• McGuire, M.B. (2008). Lived religion: Faith and practice in everyday life. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Micklethwait, J. & Wooldridge, A. (2009). God is back: How the global revival of faith is changing the world. New York: Penguin Press.
• Nag, K. (2014). The saffron tide: The rise of the BJP. Delhi: Rupa Publications.
• Naidu, R. (2013). Whither secularism: Is it a problem of definition?. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(3), 53–61.
• Nandy, A. (1988). The politics of secularism and the recovery of religious tolerance. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 13, 177–194.
• Narayanan, V. (2015). The history of the academic study of religion in universities, centers and institutes in India. Numen, 62, 7–39.
• Needham, A.D. & Sunder Rajan, R. (Eds.). (2007). The crisis of secularism in India. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Nehru, J. (1946). The discovery of India. London: Meridian Books.
• Nongbri, B. (2013). Before religion: A history of a modern concept. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2009). Cosmopolitan communications: Cultural diversity in a globalized world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Noorani, A.G. (2015). Ambedkar, Gandhi & Jinnah. Frontline (June 12th), 115–122.
• Oberoi, H. (1994). The construction of religious boundaries: Culture, identity, and diversity in the Sikh tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• O’Connell, J.T. (1976). Dilemmas of secularism in Bangladesh (pp. 64–81). In: B.L. Smith (Ed.). Religion and social conflict in South Asia. Leiden: Brill.
• O’Connell, J.T. (2004). Wilfred Cantwell Smith’s Islam in modern history: Its current pertinence for Bangladesh. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 49(1), 105–122.
• O’Connell, J.T. (2007). The task of a humanist in Bangladesh. Nibandhamala. Bulletin of the Centre for Advanced Research in the Humanities, 14, 123–146.
• O’Connell, J.T. (2009). Academic study of religion in Bangladesh: challenges and opportunities. Nibandhamālā, Bulletin of the Centre for Advanced Research in the Humanities, University of Dhaka, 15, 73–108.
• O’Connell, J.T. (2010). Religious Studies in South Asia amid secularist‑communalist tensions: Focus on Bangladesh. Unpublished paper presented at Religion a Human Phenomenon during the XXth IAHR Quinquennial World Congress, 15.08–21.08.2010, Toronto, Canada.
• O’Connell, J.T. (2011). Introduction to religious studies in South Asia: The Dhaka initiative. Bangladesh e‑Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 5–18.
• Orsi, R.A. (2003). Is the study of lived religion irrelevant to the world we live in? Special Presidential Plenary Address, Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, Salt Lake City, November 2, 2002. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(2), 169–174.
• Pandey, V. (Ed.). (2014). Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya and the formative years of Indian nationalism. Delhi: LG Publishers Distributors.
• Pandey, V. & Chandramouli, K. (2011). Visionary of modern India: Madan Mohan Malaviya. New Delhi: Roli Books.
• Pennington, B.K. (2005). Was Hinduism invented? Britons, Indians, and colonial construction of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Pew Global Attitude Project 2007 — accessible at: http://pewglobal.org/reports/pdf/258.pdf (10.04.2015).
• Pollack, D. & Olson, V. (Eds.). (2008). The role of religion in modern societies. New York–London: Routledge.
• Punter, D. (2007). Modernity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Raju, C.K. (n.d.). Escaping Western superstition. Retrieved from the author’s private website: http://ckraju.net/hps‑aiu/Escaping‑Western‑superstitions.pdf (10.04.2015).
• Renold, L. (2005). A Hindu education: Early years of Banaras Hindu University. New Delhi– New York: Oxford University Press.
• Robinson, R. (2004). The sociology of religion in India. New Delhi: Thousand Oaks / Sage.
• Robinson, R. & Sinha, V. (2010). South and Southeast (pp. 127–150). In: Alles, G.D. (Ed.).Religious studies: A global view. London: Routledge.
• Sander, Å. (1994). Religion och Religiositet: Några reflektioner kring definitionsproblematiken. Unpublished manuscript. Institutionen för filosofi. Göteborgs Universitet.
• Sander, Å. (2013). Sociology of religion: Main topics and socio–political relevancy (pp. 14–60). In: R. Sain (Ed.). The sociology of religion in India: Past, present and future. Delhi: Abhijeet Publications.
• Sander, Å. (2014). The phenomenological method revisited: towards comparative studies and non‑theological interpretations of the religious experience. Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal, 4(1), 9–34. Retrieved from: http://argumentwp.vipserv.org/wp-content/up‑loads/2014/pdfv4n1/argument_v4n1_Sander.pdf (30.05.2015).
• Sander, Å. (2015). Norm and value changes in a globalized world (pp. 119–144). In: S. Olofsson (Ed.). Den Trogne Arbetaren i Vingården. Festskrift till Bo Claesson. Göteborg: LIR Skrifter Varia.
• Sander, Å. & Andersson, D. (2015). Religion och religiositet i en pluralistisk och föränderlig värld. Några teoretiska, metodologiska och begreppsliga kartor (pp. 37–138). In: D. Andersson & Å. Sander. Det mångreligiösa Sverige. Ett landskap i förändring. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
• Sardella, F. (2010). Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati: The context and significance of a modern Hindu personalist. Göteborg: Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion, University of Gothenburg.
• Sardesai, R. (2014). 2014. The election that changed India. Haryana: Penguin Group.
• Schmidt, V. (2006). Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity?. Current Sociology, 54, 77–97.
• Shah, T., Toft, M., & Philpott, D. (2011). God’s century: Resurgent religion and global politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Sikka, S. & Lori, G.B. (2014). Multiculturalism and religious identity: Canada and India. Montreal: McGill‑Queen’s University Press.
• Staal, F. (1989). Rules without meaning: Ritual, mantras, and the human sciences. New York: Peter Lang.
• Statman, D. (Ed.). (1997). Virtue ethics: [A critical reader]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Stausberg, M. (2007). The study of religion(s) in Western Europe (I): Prehistory and history until World War II. Religion, 37(4), 294–318.
• Stausberg, M. (2008). The study of religion(s) in Western Europe (II): Institutional developments after World War II. Religion, 38(4), 305–318.
• Stausberg, M. (2009). The study of religion(s) in Western Europe (III): Further developments after World War II. Religion, 39(3), 261–282. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.religion.2009.06.001 (30.05.2015).
• Schütz, A. (1976). Equality and the meaning of the social world (pp. 228–273). In: A. Schütz. Collected papers (Vol. 3: Studies in phenomenology and philosophy). The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
• Sivaramakrishnan, K. & Agrawal, A. (2003). Regional modernities: The cultural politics of development in India. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
• Stark, R. & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Stroumsa, G.G. (2010). A new science: The discovery of religion in the age of reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Thapar, R. (Ed.). (2000). India: Another millennium?. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
• Tharamangalam, J. (1995). Indian social scientist and critique of secularism. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(9), 457–461.
• Tejani, S. (2007). Indian secularism: A social and intellectual history 1890–1950. New Delhi: Permanent Black.
• Veer, P.V.D. (2001). Imperial encounters: Religion and modernity in India and Britain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Vidyarthi, L.P. (1979). The sacred complex of Kasha: A microcosmos of Indian civilization. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.
• De Vries, H.D. (Ed.). (2008). Religion: Beyond a concept. New York: Fordham University Press.
• Wagner, P. (2001). Theorising modernity inescapability and attainability in social theory. London: Sage.
• Wohlrab‑Sahr, M. & Burchardt, M. (2012). Multiple secularities: Toward a cultural sociology of secular modernity. Comparative Sociology, 11(6), 875–909.
• Yelle, R. (2012). Comparative religion as cultural combat: Occidentalism and RELATIVISM in Rajiv Malhotra’s being different. International Journal of Hindu Studies, 16(3), 335–348