Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


System messages
  • Session was invalidated!
2014 | 6(125) | 11-34

Article title

Nowe interpretacje zasady reprezentacji politycznej

Content

Title variants

EN
New Interpretations of the Principle of Political Representation

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
This article examines new approaches to the constitutional principle of political representation, otherwise called indirect democracy or responsible government. However, as it turns out, this principle, which nowadays is the basis for all democracies, is subject to constant reinterpretation, mostly in rapidly developing political sciences. The traditional, which is typical to constitutional law, approach to representation as vesting (by the act of election) in the representatives (Members of Parliament) the right to act in the name and on behalf of voters, is today deemed undoubtedly insufficient. Consequently, new explanations and justifications for political representation are sought. Therefore, some recognize that representation is merely a simulation of that what those represented could do if they were capable of taking particular action, while others are likely to treat representation as substitution, i.e. traditional taking action for someone else. Representation is also seen as parallelization, that is reproducing by the representative of the traits of the represented person. Yet another different approach to representation considers it as a correlation, or striving to substantial consensus of appraisals of the representative and the represented person irrespective of the degree of similarity of their structural features, or in the category of a conversion, i.e. a transition of “an input” (of appraisals represented) to “an output”, i.e. the decision of a representative body. Representation is sometimes perceived from the perspective of interaction, deliberation, the right to veto or a complex control mechanism. All these approaches are common to the three major theories of representative democracy, which is either a replication (repetition of appraisals of the represented person), or an aggregation, i.e. an arithmetic sum of partial interests, or a deliberation, which means a search — irrespective of differences and dissimilarities — for the essence of representation as establishing the common good. The development of the above-mentioned new concepts and research approaches is enhanced by a phenomenon known as the crisis of representation, or failure of electoral mechanisms, which to date were the essence of representative democracy.

Year

Issue

Pages

11-34

Physical description

Contributors

  • Dr hab., prof. Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-878e49ca-68ae-421a-97fd-1fa5dce4f18d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.