Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 27 |

Article title

ТРАНСФОРМАЦІЯ ЖИТТЄВОГО СВІТУ Й ГУМАНІСТИЧНИЙ АНТРОПОЦЕНТРИЗМ ІСТОРІОПИСАННЯ

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
TRANSFORMATION OF LIFE WORLD AND HUMANISTIC ANTHROPOCETRISM OF HISTORIOGRAPHY

Languages of publication

UK

Abstracts

EN
The article deals with a topical problem to harmonize the ever growing diversity of methodological tools for historical research and the necessity to deepen homogeneous understanding of a human being both as a subject and an object of a historical process. Humanforming function of culture requires active cooperation of different scientific approaches. In the conditions of rapid changes of real historical situation of civilizational choice it becomes extremely important to probe deep into essence of human nature. Controversial interpretation of human nature, the burden of mental stereotypes, the lack of racial and national tolerance remained the source of dangerous conflicts at all the stages of historical development. The potential of historical anthropology is far from being exhausted in a sense of methodological seifdevelopment of national historiography. Active segmentation and specification of general methodological outlook of a modern scientist sometimes leads to erosion in humanistic perception of a historical moment, to a neglect of a human being, to misunderstanding of his or her life world. In this sense a well-known Husserl’s concept “life world„ has a good perspective from the point of view of widening the horizons of modern historical epistemiology. In the paradigm of historical experience and historical consciousness the opposition human being — system acqures purely practical content in the process of investigating real evolution of European civil society. Postmodern “occupation of life world“ (Habermas) in conditions of globalization leads to reevaluation of possibilities of the system and corresponding underevaluation of the possibilities and the role of the human being. And this, in ist turn, leads to underestimation of human experience as the most important content of historical science.

Contributors

author
  • Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-87b9125b-c481-4f8d-8904-6b477f2ae9cf
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.