Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2014 | 2(2) | 80-92

Article title

Mobilność kapitału ludzkiego jako źródło międzynarodowej i wewnątrzkrajowej dyfuzji wiedzy

Content

Title variants

EN
Human capital mobility as a source of international and intranational knowledge diffusion

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
It is believed that human capital mobility is essential for both intranational as well as international knowledge diffusion and consequently for the improvement of innovativeness and competitiveness of enterprises and national economies. The common opinion, however, is that it is only the receiving party who benefits in the form of spillover effects while the source company or country of the worker lose (or do not gain) as a result of his departure or emigration. Because of this, policy makers in many countries, and not only those with developing or emerging economies, fear that activities of mobile academic researchers or skilled industry staff will positively affect only the host country despite the fact that the worker have been largely financed by the source country. In the light of ongoing discussion concerning potentially negative consequences of human capital mobility for the parent party, the aim of this article is to show, on the example of selected national economies, the relationship between human capital mobility and knowledge diffusion as well as identify the factors that stimulate and inhibit knowledge diffusion through labour mobility. On the basis of empirical research findings it may be stated that there is no support for the widespread concern that only the party which receives human capital gains its precious know-how. Namely, regardless of the knowledge diffusion measurement method used (method in which the measure is certain economic indicator; citation method, survey study method), evidence can be found that both mobile academic researchers as well as skilled industry workers transfer knowledge also to the source company and country. Moreover, these effects are noticeable in both developed as well as emerging and developing economies. The diffusion of knowledge, however, does not always occur or the strength of the diffusion may vary, in both the parent party as well as the party hiring the worker. The role of human capital mobility in transfer of knowledge depends on a number of factors. Diffusion of knowledge is fostered by (1) existence of a technological gap between the source party and the party which hires the worker, yet this gap cannot be too large; (2) high ability of the hiring party to absorb foreign know-how; (3) patent system with poor protection of intellectual property rights; (4) the mobile worker having knowledge ”distant” from the one possessed by the hiring party and (5) employment of the mobile worker in non-core technological areas of her or his new employer. The barriers to diffusion of knowledge are (1) high propensity to patent innovation at the company from which the worker departs; (2) using of hard intellectual property rights protection strategy by the company from which the worker departs; (3) using of high wage strategy by the company and (4) the company using a strategy consisting in relaying knowledge to employees only by their supervisors and not through technical instructions, service manual

Year

Issue

Pages

80-92

Physical description

Contributors

References

  • Agarwal R., Ganco M., Ziedonis R.H., Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility, “Strategic Management Journal” 2009, vol. 30, no. 13.
  • Agrawal A., Cockburn I., McHale J., Gone but not forgotten: labor flows, knowledge spillovers and enduring social relationship, “Journal of Economic Geography” 2006, vol. 6, no. 5.
  • Aitken B., Harrison A., Do domestic firms benefit from FDI? Evidence from Venezuela, “American Economic Review” 1999, vol. 89, no. 3.
  • Almeida P., Kogut B., Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks, “Management Science” 1999, vol. 45, no. 7.
  • Almeida P., Kogut B., Technology and geography: the localization of knowledge and the mobility of patent holders, Working Paper, The Huntsman Center for Global Competition and innovation, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1996.
  • Azoulay P., Graff Zivin J.S., Sampat B.N., The diffusion of scientific knowledge across time and space: evidence from proffesional transitions for the superstars of medicine, NBER Working Paper Series 2011, no. 16683.
  • Bhide A., How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work, “Harvard Business Review” 1994, vol. 72, no. 2.
  • Blömstrom M., Kokko A., Policies to encourage inflows of technology through foreign multinationals, “World Development” 1995, vol. 23, no. 3.
  • Blömstrom M., Sjöholm F., Technology transfer and spillovers: does local participation with multinationals matter?, “European Economic Review” 1999, no. 43.
  • Blömstrom M., Wolff E., Multinational corporations and productivity convergence in Mexico, NBER Working Paper Series 1989, no. 3141.
  • Branstetter L., Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States, NBER Working Paper Series 2000, no. 8015.
  • Caves R., Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets, “Economica” 1974, vol. 41, no. 162.
  • Cheung K., Lin P., Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: evidence from the provincial data, “China Economic Review” 2004, vol. 15.
  • Coe D., Helpman E., International R&D spillovers, “European Economic Review” 1995, vol. 39, no. 5.
  • Edler J., Fier H., Grimpe Ch., International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer, „ Research Policy” 2011, vol. 40, no. 6.
  • Filatotchev J., Liu X., Wright M., Knowledge spillovers through human mobility across national borders: Evidence from Zhonggvancun Science Park in China, “Research Policy” 2011, vol. 40, no. 3.
  • Findlay R., Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: a simple dynamic model, “Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1978, vol. 92.
  • Globerman S., Kokko A., Sjöholm F., Technology sourcing in Swedish MNEs and SMEs: evidence from patent data, Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 1996, Nr 125.
  • Görg H., Strobl E., Spillovers from foreign firms through worker mobility: an empirical investigation, “The Scandinavian Journal of Economics” 2005, vol. 107, no. 4.
  • Grotte M., Kapitał polskich migrantów w rozwoju mikroprzedsiębiorstw, Poltext, Warszawa 2012.
  • Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R., Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, “Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1993, vol. 108, no. 3.
  • Kim J., Marschke G., Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm’s patenting decision, “RAND Journal of Economics” 2005, vol. 36, no. 2.
  • Kokko A., Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers, “Journal of Development Economics” 1994, vol. 43, no. 2.
  • Krawczyńska-Butrym Z., Migracje. Wybrane zagadnienia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin 2009.
  • Levin R.C., Klevorick A.K., Nelson R.R., Winter S.G., Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, “Brooking Papers on Economic Activity” 1987, vol. 1986, no. 3.
  • Liu X., Wright M., Filatotchev J., Dai O., Lu J., Human mobility and international knowledge spillovers: Enterprises in an emerging market, “Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal” 2010, vol. 4, no. 4.
  • Mansfield E., Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: a comparative study, “American Economic Review” 1988, vol. 78.
  • Markusen J., Trofimenko N., Teaching locals new tricks: foreign experts as a channel of knowledge transfers, “ Journal of Development Economics” 2009, vol. 88, no. 1.
  • Nakamura T., International knowledge spillovers and technology imports: evidence from Japanese chemical and electric industries, “Journal of the Japanese and International Economies” 2001, no. 15.
  • OECD, International Migration Outlook 2013, OECD, 2013.
  • Oettl A., Agrawal A., International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities, “Journal of International Business Studies” 2008, vol. 39, no. 8.
  • Roach M., Cohen W.M., Lens or Prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research, NBER Working Paper Series 2012, no. 18292.
  • Sjöholm F., Exports, imports and productivity: results from Indonesian Establishment data, “World Development” 1999, vol. 27, no. 4.
  • Smarzyńska-Jaworcik B., Saggi K., Spatareanu M., Does it matter where you come from? Vertical spillovers from foreign direct investment and the nationality of investors, Policy Research Paper Series 2004, no. 3449.
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G., Learning-by-hiring: when is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer?, “Management Science” 2003, vol. 49, no. 4.
  • Stoyanov A., Zubanov N., Productivity spillovers across firms through worker mobility, “American Economic Journal: Applied Economics” 2012, vol. 4, no. 2.
  • Wachowska M., Wpływ system patentowego na dyfuzję wiedzy, ‚‚Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis. Ekonomia” 2008, vol. 16, no.3116.
  • Węgleński J., Imigracje a globalizacja. Przykład Stanów Zjednoczonych, Wydawnictwo Scholar, Warszawa, 2012.
  • Zientara P., Międzynarodowe migracje o charakterze ekonomicznym: przyczyny, mechanizmy, konsekwencje, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, 2012.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-87ef87c9-2d65-4a44-8fb8-8f5355c70837
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.