EN
The author of the presented article out a thorough interpretation of can. 127 § 1 CIC. According to the analyses, in the final stage of the decision process a superior remains autonomous in placing acts. However, making the decision becomes impossible without the consent of a college or group of persons. The author of the study proved that convoking a college or group of persons is a strict requirement. This is because in this case a disabling act applies in implicit manner. The analysed can. 127 § 1 CIC include different dispositions concerning the consent and counsel. If a superior does not procure the consent, he cannot act as he intended to. As for the counsel, he is obliged under sanction of invalidity to seek the judgement of college or group of persons. In this case, however, it is not necessary for him to follow the opinion expressed by the consultative body. According to the author, the diversity of the solutions applied from the diverse character of acts placed by an ecclesiastical superior in the canonical system.