Poverty, Freedom, and Solidarityin the Thought of Amartya Sen

• Authors: Gerald J. Beyer
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

After the fall of communism in 1989 in Poland, a large portion of decision-makers responsible for the socioeconomic transformations held a neoliberal understanding of freedom. This negative construal of freedom does not see poverty as a lack of freedom. A person is free when no other human being, group, or institution coerces her. In other words, a person is free when the principle of noninterference is upheld. Moreover, the interference of the state in the economic sphere obviates freedom. The neoliberal conception of freedom also holds that freedom does not require solidarity or any assistance from others. Thus, a poor person is free so long as he or she is left to fend for themselves without interference from others. This article appeals to Amartya Sen’s conception of freedom to argue that, in contradistinction to Leszek Balcerowicz’s contention, poverty is tantamount to a lack of human freedom. The article describes Sen’s multifaceted conception of freedom, including the differentiation between instrumental and substantive freedoms, as well as the relationship between them. The relationship among freedoms, as well Sen’s conception of poverty as capability deprivation, illuminates the true nature of poverty, which often negates the ability to achieve substantive freedoms. The article also elucidates how freedom in a free-market economy and democracy constitutes both a goal of development and a path to solidarity. Sen’s paradigm also demonstrates that advancing freedom requires solidarity because freedom is in a certain sense a social entity. Sen rightly maintains that the realization of freedom requires solidarity embodied in social institutions, including, at least in some cases, governmental institutions. On the macro scale, Sen’s conception of development and freedom reveals the problematic nature of “shock therapy” used in Poland during the initial phase of the social economic transformations after 1989. In this sense, this article situates Sen’s thought in the Polish socioeconomic context, which also reveals the significance of Sen’s thought more clearly. Finally, the concluding section of the article points to some similarities (and some differences) between Sen’s ideas and Catholic social thought.

Keywords

EN

Amartya Sen; freedom; poverty; solidarity; neoliberalism; capability approach; Catholic social thought; Polish neoliberalism; “shock therapy”

• Publisher: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk / Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Prakseologia
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 156
• Pages: 135-156

Contributors

author

Gerald J. Beyer

• Villanova University, USA

References

• Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by D. Ross. revised edition ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
• Balcerowicz, Leszek. „Toward a Limited State.” The World Bank Group, Available at http://www.nbp.pl/aktualnosci/wiadomosci_2003/tls.pdf
• Balcerowicz, Leszek. Wolność i rozwój: ekonomia wolnego rynku. Kraków: Znak, 2010. Available at http://www.balcerowicz.pl/pl/a/11,Wolnosc-i-rozwoj-ekonomia-wolnego-rynku
• Balcerowicz, Leszek. Państwo w przebudowie. Krakow: Znak, 2010. Available at http://www.balcerowicz.pl/pliki/artykuly/4_panstwo_w_przebudowie.pdf Beyer, Gerald J. „Economic Rights: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Human Rights, edited by Thomas Cushman, 291–310. London; New York: Routledge, 2012.
• Beyer, Gerald J. „Freedom as a Challenge to an Ethic of Solidarity in a Neoliberal Capitalist World: Lessons from Post-1989 Poland.” Journal of Catholic Social Th ought 6, no. 1 (2009): 133–69.
• Beyer, Gerald J. „The Meaning of Solidarity in Catholic Social Teaching.” Political Theology 14, no. 1 (Forthcoming 2014).
• Beyer, Gerald J.. Recovering Solidarity: Lessons from Poland’s Unfi nished Revolution. Catholic Social Tradition Series. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010.
• Daniels, Norman. „Equal Liberty and Unequal Worth of Liberty.” In Reading Rawls : Critical Studies on Rawls’ a Theory of Justice, edited by Norman Daniels. Stanford Series in Philosophy, 253–82. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1989.
• Gasparski, Wojciech. „Kwestia bogactwa i ubóstwa w literaturze przedmiotu.” In Etyczne aspekty bogacenia sie i ubóstwa, edited by Adam Węgrzecki, 7–24. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie, 2003.
• Hollenbach, David. The Common Good and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
• John Paul II. Jan Pawel II: Polska 1999: Przemowienia I Homilie. Marki: Michalineum, 1999.
• John Paul II. Redemptor Hominis. Vatican website; available at http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_04031979_redemptorhominis_en.html.
• Kaleta, Józef. „Plusy i minusy.” In Spór O Polskę: 1989–1999, edited by Paweł Śpiewak, 655–666. Warsaw: PWN, 2001.
• Kanbur, S. M. Ravi, Nora Lustig, and World Bank. Attacking Poverty. World Development Report, 2000/2001. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
• Novak, Michael. „The Rights and Wrongs of „Economic Rights”: A Debate Continued.” Th is World 17, no. Spring (1987).
• Nussbaum, Martha Craven. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 2000.
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univeristy Press, 1999.
• Sandel, Michael J. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge Cambridgeshire; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
• Sen, Amartya Kumar. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford Blackwell, 1987.
• Sen, Amartya Kumar. Development as Freedom. 1st. ed. New York: Knopf, 1999.
• Sen, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009.
• Sen, Amartya Kumar. Development as Freedom. 1st. ed. New York: Knopf, 1999.
• Sen, Amartya Kumar. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford Blackwell, 1987.
• Sider, Ron „Development as Freedom.” First Th ings (January 2001).
• Szacki, Jerzy. Liberalism after Communism. Budapest ; New York: Central European University Press, 1995.
• Walicki, Andrzej. „Marx and Freedom.” New York Review of Books (November 24 1983): 50–55.
• Wilczyński, Wacław. „Wrogie państwo opiekuńcze.” In Wrogie państwo opiekuńcze czyli trud-na droga Polski do gospodarki rynkowej: felietony z tygodnika „Wprost” z lat 1995–1999, 145–46. Warszawa: Wydaw. Naukowe PWN, 1999.