Future-oriented Innovative Practices for Human Resources Development.

• Authors: Poteralska Beata

Title variants

PL

Zorientowane na przyszłość innowacyjne praktyki w zakresie rozwoju zasobów ludzkich.

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Dynamic changes taking place on the labour market justify the need for constant development of competences. Competences necessary in the future will comprise two categories: STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Maths) and soft competences (e.g. creativity, dealing with uncertainty, unpredictability, and quick adaptation to the changing environment) (Dębkowska et al., 2022, Klowden & Lim, 2021, Sala et al., 2020). However, competence gaps between competences acquired in education and market demand by companies are observed (Bauer et al, 2011, Haukka, 2011). Moreover, investigations clearly show that people do not learn well as passive recipients of knowledge delivered by experts. Effective learning requires active engagement in the process (Serrano et al., 2019, Bolstad et al., 2012). The paper is aimed at analysing teaching-learning methods and proposing methods which could be used in the formal education system to acquire future-oriented competences. The author proposes to apply foresight and Futures Literacy approaches allowing, on the one hand, for active participation, and on the other hand, for the acquisition of particularly needed soft futureoriented competences, mainly dealing with uncertainty and unpredictability.

PL

Dynamiczne zmiany zachodzące na rynku pracy uzasadniają konieczność systematycznej weryfikacji i aktualizacji kompetencji. Kompetencje niezbędne w przyszłości będą obejmować dwie kategorie: kompetencje techniczne STEM oraz miękkie (np. kreatywność, radzenie sobie z niepewnością, nieprzewidywalnością, szybkie dostosowywanie się do zmieniającego się otoczenia) (Dębkowska i in., 2022, Klowden i Lim, 2021, Sala i in., 2020). Obecnie obserwowane są rozbieżności pomiędzy kompetencjami nabytymi w ramach systemu edukacji a oczekiwaniami przedsiębiorstw (Bauer i in., 2011, Haukka, 2011). Ponadto badania jednoznacznie wskazują, że ludzie nie uczą się dobrze, będąc biernymi odbiorcami wiedzy dostarczanej przez ekspertów. Skuteczna nauka wymaga aktywnego zaangażowania w proces (Serrano i in., 2019, Bolstad i in., 2012). Celem artykułu jest analiza metod nauczania-uczenia się oraz zaproponowanie metod, które można zastosować w systemie edukacji formalnej w celu nabycia przyszłościowych kompetencji. Autorka proponuje wykorzystanie podejść foresight i Futures Literacy, pozwalających z jednej strony na aktywne uczestnictwo w procesie nauczania-uczenia się, a z drugiej strony na nabycie szczególnie potrzebnych miękkich kompetencji zorientowanych na przyszłość, pozwalających na radzenie sobie z niepewnością i nieprzewidywalnością charakteryzującą rynek pracy

Keywords

EN

human resources development, competences,; activating teaching-learning; methods,; foresight,; Futures Literacy.

PL

rozwój zasobów ludzkich, kompetencje,; aktywizujące metody nauczania-; -uczenia się,; foresight,; Futures Literacy.

• Publisher: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz – Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji, Radom
• Journal: Edukacja Ustawiczna Dorosłych
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 89-102

Dates

printed

2023-12-20

Contributors

author

Poteralska Beata

• Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce

References

• Al Azawi, R., Al-Obaidy, M. and Qaddoum, K. (2020). Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) in Distance Learning: Present and Future. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Technology Trends. Online edition, pp. 140–145.
• Al Shehhi, M., Alzouebi, K. and Ankit, A. (2021). An examination of the emotional intelligence of school principals and the impact on school climate in public schools in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 13, issue 5, pp. 1269–1289.
• Bauer, C., Viola, K. and Strauss, C. (2011). Management skills for artists: ‘learning by doing’? Int. J. Cult. Policy, vol. 17, issue 5, pp. 626–644.
• Bilyk, V., Banak, R., Bardadym O., Sokal M., Anichkina, O. (2023). Introduction of interactive teaching methods in modern schools. Eduweb – Revista de Tecnologia de Informacion y Comunicacion en Educacion, vol. 17, issue 2, pp. 199–209.
• Bodinet, J. C. (2016). Pedagogies of the futures: Shifting the educational paradigms. European Journal of Futures Research, vol. 4, article number: 21.
• Bogacka, M. and Pikon, K. (2017). Work in Progress: Combining active learning methods in engineering education. Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference. Athens, Greece, pp. 1863–1867.
• Bolstad, R., Gilbert J., McDowall S., Bull A., Boyd S., and Hipkins R. (2012). Supporting futureoriented learning & teaching – a New Zealand perspective Report to the Ministry of Education, New Zealand Council for Educational Research, Ministry of Education, New Zealand.
• Borrasca, B. J. (2014). Collaborative learning in the university: models and practice. ReduRevista de Docencia Universitaria, vol. 12, issue 4, pp. 281–302.
• Bourmistrov, A., Amo, B. W. (2022). Creativity, proactivity and foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 174, Article Number 121215.
• Buchberger, I., Bolcevic, V. and Kovac, V. (2017). Critical Thinking in Education: Contributions and Possible Directions. Metodicki Ogledi-Methodical Review, vol. 24, issue 1, pp. 109–129.
• Bukharina, A. Y. (2017). Talent management: what to teach employees today to survive tomorrow. Social Psychology and Society, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 144–162.
• Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., Casas, R., Dieste, B. (2022), Improving Design Project Management in Remote Learning. Sustainability, vol. 14, issue 17, 11025.
• Coates J. F. (1985). Foresight in federal government policymaking. Futures Research Quarterly, vol. 1, pp. 29–53.
• Huang, W. Z., Xie, X. X., Bian W., Zhang, H. (2016). Research on the Novel Education Pattern for Science and Engineering Classes Based on Experiment and Interactive Teaching Method. Proceedings of International Conference on Education, Management, Computer and Society. Shenyang, China, pp. 444–447.
• Ilidzhev, A. A. and Ibragimova, A. N. (2018). Procedural Component of the Didactic System in the Competence-Based Paradigm of Education. Proceedings of the 4th International Forum on Teacher Education. Kazan, Russia, pp. 594–601.
• Inra, J. A., Pelletier, S., Kumar N. L., Barnes E. L., Shields, H. M. (2017). An active learning curriculum improves fellows’ knowledge and faculty teaching skills. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, vol. 8, pp. 359–364.
• Ioannidou O. and Erduran S. (2022). Policymakers’ Views of Future-Oriented Skills in Science Education. Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, article 910128.
• Kaliuzhna, Y. and Peretiatko, L. (2016). Features of the Development of Future Teachers’ Cognitive Motivation in the Process of Teaching Psychological Disciplines. Science and Education, vol. 2–3, pp. 125–129.
• Keller, J., Markmann, C., and von der Gracht, H. A. (2015). Foresight support systems to facilitate regional innovations: A conceptualization case for a German logistics cluster. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 98, pp. 15–28.
• Khalil, L. and Semono-Eke, B. K. (2020). Appropriate Teaching Methods for General English and English for Specific Purposes from Teachers’ Perspectives. Arab World English Journal, vol. 11, issue 1, pp. 253–269
• Tolkacheva, K. (2016). Students Become Experts: Changing the Roles in the Learning Process. Proceedings of 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Valencia, Spain, pp. 5553–5558.
• Vaclavik, M., Tomasek, M., Cervenkova, I., Baarova, B. (2022). Analysis of Quality Teaching and Learning from Perspective of University Students. Education Sciences, vol. 12, issue 11.
• Vaganova, O. I., Korostelev, A. A., Smirnova, Z. V., Abramova, N. S. and Dolmatov, S. N. (2019). Improving teachers’ professionalism through the development of creativity, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, vol. 8, issue 8, pp. 630–634.
• Verdiyeva, T. (2021). Prospects for the Application of Active Learning Methods in Modern Education. Revista on line de Politica e Gestao Educacional, vol. 25, pp.1649–1664.
• Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C. and Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to Learning and Schooling in the Digital Networked World of the 21st Century. J. Comput. Assist. Learn, vol. 29, pp. 403–413.
• Wang, Q. and Liu, J. J. (2020). Teaching for the future: a transnational university practice. On the Horizon, vol. 28, issue 2, pp. 85–92.
• Yarygin, O. N., Korostelev, A. A., Akhmetov, L. G. & Maseleno, A. (2019). Modeling of competence as a tool of goal setting for education in modern society. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 7, issue 6, pp. 72–77.

Identifiers

ISSN

1507-6563

EISSN

2391-8020