Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2025 | 35 | 1 | 45-80

Article title

Everyone is different, but does it matter? The role of heterogeneity in empirically grounded agent-based models of alternative fuel vehicles diffusion

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
There is a large literature on agent-based models (ABMs) to study the diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs). Potentially, ABMs could be used to design policies that effectively promote AFVs. Unfortunately, ABMs have several drawbacks related to their complexity – models that are too simple are unrealistic, and models that are too complicated are difficult to describe, verify, and validate. Here we investigate what level of complexity is needed. We focus on the issue of heterogeneity because it is one of the biggest advantages of ABMs, but also one of the main sources of complexity. We begin with a brief review of ABMs for AFV diffusion. We then generalize an empirically grounded ABM of AFVs to analyze the role of different types of heterogeneity related to individual characteristics and social network structure. We show that most of these heterogeneities do not affect the outcome of the model. To facilitate replication of our results, we describe the model and its calibration to empirical data in detail. We also provide a link to a public GitHub repository where the code files, empirical data, and scripts are uploaded to analyze the results.

Year

Volume

35

Issue

1

Pages

45-80

Physical description

Contributors

  • Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modélisation, CY Cergy Paris Université, CNRS, Cergy-Pontoise, France
  • Department of Operations Research and Business Intelligence, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland
  • Institute of Theoretical Physics, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland
  • Department of Science, Technology and Society Studies, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

References

  • Ahkamiraad, A., and Wang, Y. An agent-based model for zip-code level diffusion of electric vehicles and electricity consumption in New York City. Energies 11, 3 (2018), 640.
  • Al-Alawi, B. M., and Bradley, T. H. Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling studies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 21 (2013), 190–203.
  • Albert, R., and Barabási, A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 1 (2002), 47–97.
  • AlixPartners (2024). 2024 International Electric Vehicle Consumer-Sentiment Survey (accessed on 23 July 2024).
  • Anderson, R. M., and May, R. M. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • Aydilek, H., and Aydilek, A. Do we really need heterogeneous agent models? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 78 (2020), 147–153.
  • Batley, R. P., Toner, J. P., and Knight, M. J. A mixed logit model of U.K. household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. International Journal of Transport Economics/ Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti 31, 1 (2004), 55–77.
  • Bergstra, J., Bardenet, R., Bengio, Y., and Kégl, B. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization. In NIPS’11: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Red Hook, NY, USA, 2011), J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, P. L. Bartlett, F. Pereira, and K. Q. Weinberger, Eds., Curran Associates Inc., p. 2546–2554.
  • Borgonovo, E., Pangallo, M., Rivkin, J., Rizzo, L., and Siggelkow, N. Sensitivity analysis of agent-based models: a new protocol. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 28, 1 (2022), 52–94.
  • Brown, M. Catching the PHEVer: Simulating electric vehicle diffusion with an agent-based mixed logit model of vehicle choice. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 16, 2 (2013), 5.
  • Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. S., and Train, K. Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 34, 5 (2000), 315–338.
  • Buchmann, T., Wolf, P., and Fidaschek, S. Stimulating e-mobility diffusion in Germany (EMOSIM): An agent-based simulation approach. Energies 14, 3 (2021), 656.
  • Bustos-Turu, G., van Dam, K. H., Acha, S., and Shah, N. A review of agent-based modelling for transport electrification analysis. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Agent-Based Modeling in Transportation Planning and Operations, 30 September - 2 October 2013, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA Imperial College London, 2013.
  • Byrka, K., Jędrzejewski, A., Sznajd-Weron, K., and Weron, R. Difficulty is critical: The importance of social factors in modeling diffusion of green products and practices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62 (2016), 723–735.
  • Chang, D.-S., Chen, S.-H., Hsu, C.-W., Hu, A. H., and Tzeng, G.-H. Evaluation framework for alternative fuel vehicles: Sustainable development perspective. Sustainability 7, 9 (2015), 11570–11594.
  • Cho, Y., and Blommestein, K. V. Investigating the adoption of electric vehicles using agent-based model. In 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (Portland, OR, USA, 2015), IEEE, pp. 2337–2345.
  • Choi, J. Agent based model for estimating HEVs market: Focusing on the case of Korea. Science, Technology and Society 21, 2 (2016), 227–249.
  • Czupryna, M., Oleksy, P., Przybek, P., and Kamiński, B. Agent-based modelling of viticulture development in emerging markets: The case of the Małopolska region. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 21, 3 (2018), 6.
  • De Haan, P., Mueller, M. G., and Scholz, R. W. How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars—Part II: Forecasting effects of feebates based on energy-efficiency. Energy Policy 37, 3 (2009), 1083–1094.
  • Deffuant, G., Huet, S., and Amblard, F. An individual-based model of innovation diffusion mixing social value and individual benefit. American Journal of Sociology 110, 4 (2005), 1041–1069.
  • Dekking, F. M., Kraaikamp, C., Lopuhaä, H. P., and Meester, L. E. A Modern Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Understanding Why and How, Springer, 2005.
  • Duffy, J. Agent-based models and human subject experiments. In Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, Tesfatsion, L., and Judd, K., Eds., Elsevier, 2006, pp. 949–1011.
  • European Environment Agency. The European Green Deal (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, (COM/2019/640 final) (accessed on 12 May 2023).
  • Egbue, O., and Long, S. Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48 (2012), 717–729.
  • Eggers, F., and Eggers, F. Where have all the flowers gone? Forecasting green trends in the automobile industry with a choice-based conjoint adoption model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78, 1 (2011), 51–62.
  • Eppstein, M. J., Grover, D. K., Marshall, J. S., and Rizzo, D. M. An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Policy 39, 6 (2011), 3789–3802.
  • Euronews (19 April 2024). Car sales in Europe decline: is the future of electric vehicles at stake? (accessed on 2 June 2024).
  • Generation180 (2023). Your influence matters: Peer influence and EV adoption (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  • Gnann, T., and Plötz, P. A review of combined models for market diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles and their refueling infrastructure. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 47 (2015), 783–793.
  • Gnann, T., Speth, D., Seddig, K., Stich, M., Schade, W., and Gómez Vilchez, J. J. How to integrate real-world user behavior into models of the market diffusion of alternative fuels in passenger cars - An in-depth comparison of three models for Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 158 (2022), 112103.
  • Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., Goss-Custard, J., Grand, T., Heinz, S. K., Huse, G., Huth, A., Jepsen, J. U., Jørgensen, C., Mooij, W. M., Müller, B., Pe’er, G., Piou, C., Railsback, S. F., Robbins, A. M., Robbins, M. M., Rossmanith, E., Rüger, N., Strand, E., Souissi, S., Stillman, R. A., Vabø, R., Visser, U., and DeAngelis, D. L. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 198, 1-2 (2006), 115–126.
  • Grimm, V., Railsback, S. F., Vincenot, C. E., Berger, U., Gallagher, C., Deangelis, D. L., Edmonds, B., Ge, J., Giske, J., Groeneveld, J., Johnston, A. S. A., Milles, A., Nabe-Nielsen, J., Polhill, J. G., Radchuk, V., Rohwäder, M.-S., Stillman, R. A., Thiele, J. C., and Ayllón, D. The odd protocol for describing agent-based and other simulation models: A second update to improve clarity, replication, and structural realism. JASSS 23, 2 (2020), 7.
  • Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., Thulke, H.-H., Weiner, J., Wiegand, T., and DeAngelis, D. L. Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science 310, 5750 (2005), 987–991.
  • Hackbarth, A., and Madlener, R. Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: A discrete choice analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 25 (2013), 5–17.
  • Higgins, A., Paevere, P., Gardner, J., and Quezada, G. Combining choice modelling and multi-criteria analysis for technology diffusion: An application to the uptake of electric vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79, 8 (2012), 1399–1412.
  • Hoppitt, W., and Lala, K. N. Social Learning: An Introduction to Mechanisms, Methods, and Models. Princeton University Press, 2013.
  • Huang, X., Lin, Y., Zhou, F., Lim, M. K., and Chen, S. Agent-based modelling for market acceptance of electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Sustainable Production and Consumption 28 (2021), 206–217.
  • International Energy Agency (April 2024). Global EV outlook 2024 (accessed on 2 June 2024).
  • Jędrzejewski, A., Nowak, B., Abramiuk, A., and Sznajd-Weron, K. Competing local and global interactions in social dynamics: How important is the friendship network? Chaos 30, 7 (2020), 073105.
  • Jędrzejewski, A., and Sznajd-Weron, K. Pair approximation for the q-voter models with quenched disorder on networks. Physical Review E 105, (2022), 064306.
  • Jędrzejewski, A., Sznajd-Weron, K., Pawłowski, J., and Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. Purchasing decisions on alternative fuel vehicles within an agent-based model. In Computational Science – ICCS 2022. 22nd International Conference, London, UK, June 21–23, 2022, Proceedings, Part II (Cham, 2022), D. Groen, C. de Mulatier, M. Paszynski, V. V. Krzhizhanovskaya, J. J. Dongarra, and P. M. A. Sloot, Eds., vol. 13351 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, pp. 719–726.
  • Kamiya, G., Axsen, J., and Crawford, C. Modeling the GHG emissions intensity of plug-in electric vehicles using short term and long-term perspectives. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 69 (2019), 209–223.
  • Kangur, A., Jager, W., Verbrugge, R., and Bockarjova, M. An agent-based model for diffusion of electric vehicles. Journal of Environmental Psychology 52 (2017), 166–182.
  • Keith, D. R., Sterman, J. D., and Struben, J. Supply constraints and waitlists in new product diffusion. System Dynamics Review 33, 3-4 (2017), 254–279.
  • Keith, D. R., Struben, J. J. R., and Naumov, S. The diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles: A generalised model and future research agenda. Journal of Simulation 14, 4 (2020), 260–277.
  • Kieckhäfer, K., Wachter, K., and Spengler, T. S Analyzing manufacturers’ impact on green products’ market diffusion - the case of electric vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production 162 (2017), S11–S25.
  • Klein, M., Lüpke, L., and Günther, M. Home charging and electric vehicle diffusion: Agent-based simulation using choice-based conjoint data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 88 (2020), 102475.
  • Kormos, C., Axsen, J., Long, Z., and Goldberg, S. Latent demand for zero-emissions vehicles in Canada (Part 2): Insights from a stated choice experiment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 67 (2019), 685–702.
  • Kot, M. An agent-based model of consumer choice. An evaluation of the strategy of pricing and advertising. Operations Research and Decisions 32, 1 (2022), 73–95.
  • Kowalska-Pyzalska, A., Kott, J., and Kott, M. Why Polish market of alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs) is the smallest in Europe? SWOT analysis of opportunities and threats. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 133 (2020), 110076.
  • Kowalska-Pyzalska, A., Michalski, R., Kott, M., Skowrońska-Szmer, A., and Kott, J. Consumer preferences towards alternative fuel vehicles. Results from the conjoint analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 155 (2022), 111776.
  • Lee, R., Yazbeck, S., and Brown, S. Validation and application of agent-based electric vehicle charging model. Energy Reports 6, Suppl. 5 (2020), 53–62.
  • Long, Z., Axsen, J., and Kormos, C. Consumers continue to be confused about electric vehicles: comparing awareness among Canadian new car buyers in 2013 and 2017. Environmental Research Letters 14, 11 (2019), 114036.
  • Long, Z., Axsen, J., Miller, I., and Kormos, C. What does Tesla mean to car buyers? Exploring the role of automotive brand in perceptions of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 129 (2019), 185–204.
  • Mazza, S., Aiello, D., Macario, A., and De Luca, P. Vehicular emission: Estimate of air pollutants to guide local political choices. A case study. Environments 7, 5 (2020), 37.
  • McCoy, D., and Lyons, S. Consumer preferences and the influence of networks in electric vehicle diffusion: An agent-based microsimulation in Ireland. Energy Research & Social Science 3 (2014), 89–101.
  • McCullen, N. J., Rucklidge, A. M., Bale, C. S. E., Foxon, T. J., and Gale, W. F. Multiparameter models of innovation diffusion on complex networks. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 12, 1 (2013), 515–532.
  • Mohammed, L., Niesten, E., and Gagliardi, D. Adoption of alternative fuel vehicle fleets – a theoretical framework of barriers and enablers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 88 (2020), 102558.
  • Noel, L., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Kester, J., and Sovacool, B. K. Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge. Energy Policy 138 (2020), 111292.
  • Noori, M., and Tatari, O. Development of an agent-based model for regional market penetration projections of electric vehicles in the United States. Energy 96 (2016), 215–230.
  • Novizayanti, D., Prasetio, E. A., Siallagan, M., and Santosa, S. P. Agent-based modeling framework for electric vehicle adoption transition in Indonesia. World Electric Vehicle Journal 12, 2 (2021), 73.
  • Oliveira, G. D., Roth, R., and Dias, L. C. Diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles considering dynamic preferences. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 147 (2019), 83–99.
  • Park Lee, E. H., Lukszo, Z., and Herder, P. Conceptualization of vehicle-to-grid contract types and their formalization in agent-based models. Complexity 2018 (2018), 569129.
  • Pettifor, H., Wilson, C., Axsen, J., Abrahamse, W., and Anable, J. Social influence in the global diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles – A meta-analysis. Journal of Transport Geography 62 (2017), 247–261.
  • Plötz, P., Gnann, T., and Wietschel, M. Modelling market diffusion of electric vehicles with real world driving data — Part I: Model structure and validation. Ecological Economics 107 (2014), 411–421.
  • Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., and Düetschke, E. Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in German. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 67 (2014), 96–109.
  • Rahmandad, H., and Sterman, J. Heterogeneity and network structure in the dynamics of diffusion: Comparing agent-based and differential equation models. Management Science 54, 5 (2008), 998–1014.
  • Railsback, S. F., and Grimm, V. Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction. Princeton University Press, 2019.
  • Rand, W., and Rust, R. T. Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor. International Journal of Research in Marketing 28, 3 (2011), 181–193.
  • Robinson, S. Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2004.
  • Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Ed. Free Press, New York, 2003.
  • Ščasný, M., Zvěřinová, I., and Czajkowski, M. Electric, plug-in hybrid, hybrid, or conventional? Polish consumers’ preferences for electric vehicles. Energy Efficiency 11, 8 (2018), 2181–2201.
  • Scheller, F., Johanning, S., and Bruckner, T. (2019). A review of designing empirically grounded agent-based models of innovation diffusion: Development process, conceptual foundation and research agenda. Research report. Beitraege des Institues fuer Infrastruktur und Resourcemanagement, No. 01/2019 (accessed on 20 November 2021).
  • Schwoon, M. Simulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16, 4 (2006), 435–472.
  • Sen, B., Noori, M., and Tatari, O. Will corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standard help? Modeling CAFE’s impact on market share of electric vehicles. Energy Policy 109 (2017), 279–287.
  • Shafiei, E., Thorkelsson, H., Ásgeirsson, E. I., Davidsdottir, B., Raberto, M., and Stefansson, H. An agent-based modeling approach to predict the evolution of market share of electric vehicles: A case study from Iceland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79, 9 (2012), 1638–1653.
  • Shepherd, S., Bonsall, P., and Harrison, G. Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: A model based study. Transport Policy 20 (2012), 62–74.
  • Shepherd, S. P. A review of system dynamics models applied in transportation. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics 2, 2 (2014), 83–105.
  • Silvia, C., and Krause, R. M. Assessing the impact of policy interventions on the adoption of plug-in electric vehicles: An agent-based model. Energy Policy 96 (2016), 105–118.
  • Sopha, B. M., Klöckner, C. A., and Febrianti, D. Using agent-based modeling to explore policy options supporting adoption of natural gas vehicles in Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Psychology 52 (2017), 149–165.
  • Squazzoni, F. Agent-Based Computational Sociology. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  • Srikrishnan, V., and Keller, K. Small increases in agent-based model complexity can result in large increases in required calibration data. Environmental Modelling & Software 138 (2021), 104978.
  • Struben, J., and Sterman, J. D. Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environ. Plan. B: Urban Anal. City Sci. 35, 6 (2008), 1070–1097.
  • Sun, Z., Lorscheid, I., Millington, J. D., Lauf, S., Magliocca, N. R., Groeneveld, J., Balbi, S., Nolzen, H., Müller, B., Schulze, J., and Buchmann, C. M. Simple or complicated agent-based models? A complicated issue. Environmental Modelling & Software 86 (2016), 56–67.
  • Sznajd-Weron, K., Jędrzejewski, A., and Kamińska, B. Toward understanding of the social hysteresis: Insights from agent-based modeling. Perspectives on Psychological Science 19, 2 (2024), 511 – 521.
  • Tran, M., Banister, D., Bishop, J. D. K., and McCulloch, M. D. Simulating early adoption of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80, 5 (2013), 865–875.
  • Veliov, V. M. On the effect of population heterogeneity on dynamics of epidemic diseases. Journal of Mathematical Biology 51, 2 (2005), 123–143.
  • Wang, F.-P., Yu, J.-L., Yang, P., Miao, L.-X., and Ye, B. Analysis of the barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles in Shenzhen China. Sustainability 9, 4 (2017), 522.
  • Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 6684 (1998), 440–442.
  • Wolbertus, R., van den Hoed, R., Kroesen, M., and Chorus, C. Charging infrastructure roll-out strategies for large scale introduction of electric vehicles in urban areas: An agent-based simulation study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 148 (2021), 262–285.
  • Wolf, I., Schröder, T., Neumann, J., and de Haan, G. Changing minds about electric cars: An empirically grounded agent-based modeling approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 94 (2015), 269–285.
  • Yang, W., Xiang, Y., Liu, J., and Gu, C. Agent-based modeling for scale evolution of plug-in electric vehicles and charging demand. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 33, 2 (2018), 1915–1925.
  • Zhang, H., and Vorobeychik, Y. Empirically grounded agent-based models of innovation diffusion: a critical review. Artificial Intelligence Review 52, 1 (2019), 707–741.
  • Zhang, T., Gensler, S., and Garcia, R. A study of the diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles: An agent-based modeling approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management 28, 2 (2011), 152–168.
  • Zsifkovits, M., and Günther, M. Simulating resistances in innovation diffusion over multiple generations: an agent-based approach for fuel-cell vehicles. Central European Journal of Operations Research 23, 2 (2015), 501–522.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-8ff2b249-6e4e-4abc-a57d-eadd3c190136
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.