THE IMPACT OF ASYNCHRONOUS COMPUTER-MEDIATED INSTRUCTION (CAI) ON EFL LEARNERS’ VOCABULARY UPTAKE ACROSS DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS

• Authors: Ajabshir Zahra Fakher , Sadeghi Karim
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This study investigated the effect of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on adult second language (L2) learners’ vocabulary recognition and production across high and low proficiency levels. Seventy-four participants were assigned to experimental (CAI) and control groups. All participants in the CAI group were categorized into high and low proficiency levels, based on their L2 vocabulary knowledge. The treatment lasted for one semester, 16 sessions, during which 16 passages were covered. While the CAI group individually worked on the passages uploaded on the CALL software, enhanced with hypertext annotations, the control group read the same passages through traditional teacher-directed instruction. The comparison of vocabulary recognition and production pretest and post-test scores revealed the significant effect of CAI on L2 learners’ vocabulary uptake in the immediate and delayed post-tests. While no significant differences were found between the high and low proficiency participants in terms of their improvement from production pretest to the post-test, lower-level participants revealed more vocabulary recognition gains. The findings have pedagogical implications for L2 teachers, practitioners, and courseware designers in that they can rely on CALL software as a viable scaffolding tool for L2 vocabulary growth.

Keywords

EN

asynchronous CALL; computer-assisted instruction (CAI); hypertext annotations; vocabulary uptake

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 68-89

Contributors

author

Ajabshir Zahra Fakher

• University of Bonab, Iran

author

Sadeghi Karim

• Urmia University, Iran

References

• Abraham, B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.
• Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157-167.
• AbuSeileek, A. F. (2008). Hypermedia annotation presentation: Learners’ preferences and effect on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 260-275.
• Anderson, N. (2008). Active Skills for Reading: Book 4 (2nd ed.). Boston: Thomson, Heinle.
• Boers, F., Warren, P., Grimshaw, G., & Slyanova-Chanturia, A. (2017). On the benefits of multimedia annotations for vocabulary uptake from reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 709-725.
• Cariana, R. B., & Lee, D. (2001). The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 23-36.
• Çakmak, F., & ErÇetin, G. (2018). Effects of gloss type on text recall and incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 1-24.
• Chiu, Y. (2013). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary instruction: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), E52-E56.
• Eftekhari, M., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2018). Effectiveness of computer-assisted argument mapping for comprehension, recall, and retention, ReCALL, 30(3), 337-354.
• Fitzpatrick, N., & Donnelly, R. (2010). Do You See What I Mean? Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. Dublin: IGI Global.
• Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19+44.
• Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
• Gorjian, B., Moosavinia, S. R., Ebrahimi Kavari, K., Asgari, P., & Hydarei, A. (2011). The impact of asynchronous computer-assisted language learning approaches on English as a foreign language high and low achievers’ vocabulary retention and recall. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 383+391.
• Harley, T. A. (2008). The Psychology of Language (Third Edition). New York: Psychology Press.
• Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use and the reoccurrence of unknown words. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 110-132.
• Khezerlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104-116.
• Kılıçkaya, F. (2015) Computer-based grammar instruction in an EFL context: Improving the effectiveness of teaching adverbial clauses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 325-340.
• Kowie, N., & Sakui, K. (2013). It’s never too late: an overview of e-learning. ELT Journal, 67(4), 459-467.
• Li, J. (2010). Learning vocabulary via computer-assisted scaffolding for text processing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 253-275.
• Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882-904.
• Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
• Mirzaei, A., Rahimi Domakani, M., & Rahimi, S. (2016). Computerized lexis-based instruction in EFL classrooms: Using multi-purpose LexisBOARD to teach L2 vocabulary. ReCALL, 28(1), 22-43.
• Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29-40.
• O’Neil, C. A., Fisher, C. A., & Newbold, S. K. (2004). Developing an Online Course: Best Practices for Nurse Educators. New York: Springer.
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255-287.
• Qin, C. (2012). Didactic considerations of vocabulary breadth and depth in EFL/ESL contexts-a literature review. Retrieved 18 January 2017 from https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/38777/1/gupea_2077_38777_1.pdf
• Rimrott, A. (2010). Computer-Assisted Vocabulary Learning: Multimedia Annotations, Word Concordances, and Individualized Instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada). Retrieved 20 February 2017 from http://summit.sfu.ca/item/11876
• Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
• Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Su, Y., Li, Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Moving literature circles into wiki-based environment: the role of online self-regulation in EFL learners’ attitude toward collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 556-586.
• Tsai, K. J. (in press). Corpora and dictionaries as learning aids: Inductive versus deductive approaches to constructing vocabulary knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527366?journalCode=ncal20
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
• Wang, A. (2014). Managing student participation: Teacher strategies in a virtual EFL course. JALT CALL Journal, 10(2), 105-125.
• Wang, Y. H. (2016). Promoting contextual vocabulary learning through an adaptive computer-assisted EFL reading system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(4), 291-303.
• Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69-87.
• Yoshi, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002) Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 27(3), 517-528.
• Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 39-58.
• Zapata, G. C., & Sagarra, N. (2007). CALL on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 153-171.
• Zhong, H. (2014). The Interface between Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge: Vocabulary Knowledge as a Multi-Aspect Construct. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia). Retrieved 21 July 2019 from https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/12472