2016 | 3/2016 (61), t.1 | 89-109
Article title

Poszukiwani przedsiębiorcy społeczni – jakość życia jako podstawa praktyki rekrutacyjnej w szkołach Beit Ekstein w Izraelu

Title variants
Social Entrepreneurs Wanted: Quality of Life Approach as a Basis for Recruitment Practice in Beit Ekstein Schools in Israel
Languages of publication
Przedmiotem artykułu jest związek pomiędzy podejściem uwzględniającym aspekt jakości życia a praktyką rekrutacyjną stosowaną przez dyrektorów szkół specjalnych Beit Ekstein. W artykule przede wszystkim zbadano trzy główne obszary: przyjęty w Beit Ekstein model jakości życia a koncepcja jakości życia; rolę dyrektorów szkół ogólnie i w Beit Ekstein; nauczycieli jako przedsiębiorców społecznych. Celem jest wskazanie konkretnych cech poszukiwanych przez dyrektorów szkół podczas rekrutacji, czego dokonano za pomocą analizy treści danych z wywiadów przeprowadzonych z dyrektorami szkół Beit Ekstein. Wyniki wskazują, że dyrektorzy tych szkół w sposób szczególny postrzegają swoje zespoły i zatrudniają osoby o cechach przedsiębiorców społecznych, gdyż cechy takich pracowników mają istotne znaczenie w rozwoju uczniów o specjalnych potrzebach. Ponadto wyniki pozwalają zrozumieć sposób postrzegania modelu jakości życia przez dyrektorów szkół.
The following paper examines the relationship between the Quality of Life approach and the recruiting practice of Beit Ekstein special education school managers. First, the paper explores three main fields: the Beit Ekstein Quality of Life model relative to quality of life concept; the role of school managers in general and specifically at Beit Ekstein; teachers as social entrepreneurs. Through a content analysis of data gathered in interviews with Beit Ekstein school managers, the article aims to identify the special characteristics that the school managers are looking for in their recruiting practice. Findings show that Beit Ekstein school managers have a specific perception of their teams and seek to hire people with the characteristics of social entrepreneurs, since the qualities held by such recruits will play a significant role in the development of their special needs pupils. Moreover, findings bring an understanding of the school manager’s perception of the Quality of Life model.
Physical description
  • Bar-Haim, A. et al. (2011). Human Resources Management, Unit 8: Human Resources Development. Raanana: the Open University of Israel (in Hebrew). Beit Ekstein. Retrieved from from (September 19, 2016).
  • Borasi, R. & Finnigan, K. (2010). Entrepreneurial attitudes and behaviors that can help prepare successful change-agents in education. The New Educator, 6(1), 1–29.
  • Bornstein, D. & Davis, S. (2010). Social Entrepreneurship: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bright, D.S., Turesky, E.F., Putzel, R. & Stang, T. (2012). Professor as Facilitator: Shaping an Emerging, Living System of Shared Leadership in the Classroom. Journal of Educational Leadership, 11(1), 157–177.
  • Cale, M., Delpino, C. & Myran, S. (2015). Instructional Leadership for Special Education in Small to Mid-Size Urban School Districts. Educational Administration, 22, 155–172.
  • Cantillon, R. (2001). Essai sur la nature du commerce en general. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers (English Edition).
  • Chen, D (2004). Between Vision to Logic: on Change Strategies and Innovation in Education. Tel Aviv: Ramot (in Hebrew).
  • Choi, N. & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376.
  • Côté J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sports. Sport Psychologist, 13(40), 395–417.
  • Counts, G.S. (1932) Dare the School Build a New Social Order? New York: John Day Company.
  • Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in Social Science Research. Introducing Qualitative Methods. London: Sage Publications.
  • Dacin, M.T., Dacin, P. A. & Tracey, P. (2011). Social Entrepreneurship: A Critique and Future Directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203–1213.
  • Dees, J.G. (1998). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship.” Comments and suggestions contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Founders Working Group. Durham, NC: Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University. Available at
  • Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Harper.
  • Filion, L.J. (1997). From Entrepreneurship to Entreprenology. Journal of Best Papers, 42nd World Conference, International Council for Small Business, San Francisco, 176–192.
  • Fisher, Y. & Friedman, Y. (2009). The Parents and the School: Interactions and Involvement. Dapim, 47, 11–37 (in Hebrew).
  • Gaziel, H. (2000). Israel’s Education Policy – Facts and Processes. In: A. Peled (ed.), Fiftieth Anniversary for Israel’s Education Ministry (volume A, pp. 67–85). Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports (in Hebrew).
  • Gordon, M. (2005). Roots of Empathy, Changing the World Child by Child. Toronto: Thomas Allen Publishers.
  • Hallinger, P. & Heck, R.H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110.
  • Hébert, R.F. & Link, A.N. (1988). The entrepreneur: Mainstream views & radical critiques. Praeger Publishers.
  • Inbar, D. (2000). Miscellaneous Management: The Educational Challenge. Or Yehuda: Reches (in Hebrew).
  • Levi-Feldman, A. (2010). Who are you the Proper Teacher? Components in the Proper Teacher’s Image as Part of Educational Philosophies. In: The Education and around it, 33, 88–104. Kibbutzim College (in Hebrew).
  • Macdonald, J. (1996). Understanding Total Quality Management in a Week – Successful Business in a Week Series, S., Walter (tran.). Hod HaSharon: Astrolog Publication (in Hebrew).
  • Martin, R.J. & Osberg, S. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for a Definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 29–39. Spring.
  • Neuman, W.L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th edition. Boston: Pearson.
  • Oplatka, Y. (2007). Basics of Education Management, third section, chapters 9, 10 (201–253). Haifa: Pardes Publication (in Hebrew).
  • Kamp-Becker, I., Schröder, J., Remschmidt, H. & Bachmann, C. J. (2010, Health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with high functioning autism-spectrum disorder. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 7.
  • Renty, J.O. & Roeyers, H. (2006). Quality of life in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder The predictive value of disability and support characteristics. Autism, 10(5), 511–524.
  • Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Schalock, R. L. (2004). The concept of quality of life: what we know and do not know. Journal of intellectual disability research, 48(3), 203–216.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1965). Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History. In: H.G. Aitken (ed.), Explorations in enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sergiovanni, T.J. (2002). School’s Management: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. Tel Aviv: The Open University of Israel (in Hebrew).
  • Shkedi, A. (2012). Words of Meaning. Qualitative Research – Theory and Practice. Tel Aviv: Ramot (in Hebrew).
  • Thake, S. & Zadek, S. (1997). Practical people, noble causes. How to support community based social entrepreneurs. New Economic Foundation.
  • Xu, H., Song, X. & Song, W. (2014). Why Social Entrepreneurship? Public and Commercial, Dual-Approach for Social Enterprises with Chinese Cases. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 3(4), 184–194.
  • Yemini, M., Addi-Raccah, A. & Katarivas, K. (2014). I Have a Dream: School Principals as Entrepreneurs. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 526–540.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.