PL EN


2010 | 19 | 4 | 353–364
Article title

Biconsequences

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
p-consequence (plausible consequence; see [2]) allows for a formulation of non-deductive reasonings, i.e., such where the conclusion has weaker justification then assumptions and thus when added to the set of assumptions results in its extension. But theoretical modesty of p-consequence operation does not tell the difference between “good” and “worse” conclusions. Therefore the bisconsequence is introduced.
Year
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
353–364
Physical description
Dates
published
2010-12-01
Contributors
References
  • Ajdukiewicz, K., Pragmatic Logic, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1974.
  • Frankowski, Sz., “Formalization of plausible inference”, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33, 1 (2004): 41–52.
  • Frankowski, Sz., “p-consequence versus q-consequence operations”, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33, 4 (2004): 195–207.
  • Frankowski, Sz., “Plausible reasoning expressed by p-consequence”, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37, 3–4 (2008): 161–170.
  • Frankowski, Sz., “On the lattice of p-consequences, Reports on Mathematical Logic 45 (2010): 23–35.
  • Shramko, Y., and H. Wansing, “Entailment relations and/as truth values”, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 36, 3–4 (2007): 131–144.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-91e334a2-4146-4ef7-a449-202824341019
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.