PL EN


2018 | 18 | 1 | 148-172
Article title

How to combat littering – an analysis with a focus on the Czech Republic

Authors
Content
Title variants
PL
JAK ZWALCZAĆ ZAŚMIECANIE – ANALIZA Z NACISKIEM NA CZECHY
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The work attempts to comprehend why littering is so extensive and, with the use of several findings provided in Gary S. Becker's article entitled “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”, to explain why under current conditions more waste discarded in the environment can be expected. The article was created from the perspective of the Czech Republic, where the author lives. He analysed some past research carried out by other scientists and institutions from all over the world, and he was also observing the situation in different Czech regions in order to approximately learn how large the problem with littering in his country is and what kind of litter can be found in the Czech nature. Afterwards, the author decided to address the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic so as to learn what measures were planned to be taken in order to significantly reduce littering. As a result of all this, the author himself decided to pay special attention to beverage containers and proposed to impose mandatory deposits on them in order to reduce the volume of litter that can be found out of the appropriate places. The author, basing his arguments on findings of other authors, gets to the conclusion that such a measure – provided that some conditions are respected – can work anywhere in the world, beverage containers not being the only type of litter suitable for this step.
PL
Praca stara się zrozumieć, dlaczego zaśmiecanie jest tak rozległe, i dzięki kilku odkryciom zawartym w artykule Gary'ego S. Beckera pt. " Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach" wyjaśnia, dlaczego w aktualnych warunkach można się spodziewać więcej odpadów odrzuconych w środowisku. Artykuł powstaje z perspektywy Republiki Czeskiej, w której mieszka autor. Ten analizował wcześniejsze badania przeprowadzone przez innych naukowców i instytucje z całego świata, a także obserwował sytuację w różnych czeskich regionach, aby w przybliżeniu dowiedzieć się, jak duży jest problem z zaśmiecaniem w jego kraju i jaki rodzaj miotu można znaleźć w czeskiej przyrodzie. Następnie autor postanowił zwrócić się do Ministerstwa Środowiska Republiki Czeskiej, aby dowiedzieć się, jakie środki są planowane w celu znacznego ograniczenia zaśmiecania. W wyniku tego, autor postanowił zwrócić szczególną uwagę na pojemniki na napoje i proponuje nałożyć obowiązkowe depozyty, aby zmniejszyć ilość śmieci, które można znaleźć w odpowiednich miejscach. Autor, opierając swoje argumenty na ustaleniach innych autorów, dochodzi do wniosku, że taki środek – pod warunkiem, że pewne warunki są przestrzegane – może działać w dowolnym miejscu na świecie, a pojemniki na napoje nie są jedynym rodzajem odpadów odpowiednich na ten etap.
Year
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
148-172
Physical description
Dates
published
2018-03-01
Contributors
author
  • Department of International Business, Faculty of International Relations, University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic
References
  • AGVU; Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (2007). The consequences of a deposit system for disposable packaging based on the German example [pdf]. Available at: http://www.foodnet.cz/soubor.php?id=11315&kontrola=47963fffea4a1dfa9745ec4015fa54aa&foodnet. Accessed 29 November 2017.
  • Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt (2016). Littering – Vermüllung der Landschaft und deren Vermeidung. Available at: http://www.lfu.bayern.de/abfall/abfallvermeidung/vermuellung/index.htm Accessed 19 March 2016.
  • Becker, Gary S. (1974). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. In: Gary S. Becker and William M. Landes, eds. Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment: 1-54. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  • Cantner, J. et al. (2010). Bewertung der Verpackungsverordnung: Evaluierung der Pfandpflicht. Texte 21/2010. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt. Bifa Umweltinstitut GmbH. ISSN 18624804.
  • City of Edmonton (2016). Litter Management Program. Litter FAQ. Available at: http://www.edmonton.ca/programs_services/documents/PDF/LitterFAQ.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2016.
  • Clark, R.N., Burges, R.L., Hendee, J.C. (1972). The Development of Anti-Litter Behavior in a Forest Campground. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 5(1): 1–5.
  • Czech Republic (2016). Návrh zákona ze dne 2016 o odpadech a o změně některých zákonů (zákon o odpadech) [draft of a law].
  • European Commission’s Directorate-General Environment (2011). Plastic Waste: Ecological and Human Health Impacts. Science for Environment Policy, 41 pp.
  • Finnie, W. C. (1973). Field experiments in litter control. Environment and Behavior. 5(2): 123–144.
  • Hogg, D.; Elliott, T.; Croasdell, S. (2011). Options and Feasibility of a European Refund System for Metal Beverage Cans. Final Report, Appendix 3: Impacts Associated with Incompatibility, 55 pp.
  • Keep Britain Tidy (2014). Litter Composition Survey Of England, 21 pp. Available at: http://www.incpen.org/docs/KBTINCPENLitterComposition2014.pdf. Accessed 29 November 2017.
  • Keizer, K.; Lindenberg, S.; Steg, L. (2008). The Spreading of Disorder. Science, 322, 2008 Dec 12, 1681–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1161405
  • Lee, D.; Graves, P.; Sexton, R. (1988). On Mandatory Deposits, Fines, and the Control of Litter. Natural Resources Journal. 28(4): 837–847.
  • Lopez Lozano R.; Mouat, J. (2009). Marine litter in the North-East Atlantic Region. London: OSPAR Commission. ISBN 978-1-906840-26-6.
  • Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic (2016). Answers to the author’s questions provided by two representatives of the Ministry (Ms. Marie Vorlíčková and Mr. Libor Dvořák), dated 1 and 15 April 2016.
  • Müller, T. (2015). Litter as a Sign of Public Disorder? The Meaning(s) of Litter as Part of Adolescents’ Presentation of Self in Public. In: Bude, H.; Dellwing, M.; Grills, S. (eds.). Kleine Geheimnisse: Alltagssoziologische Einsichten: 21–39. Weisbaden: Springer.
  • Muñoz-Cadena, C.E.; Lina-Manjarrez, P.; Estrada-Izquierdo, I., Ramón-Gallegos, E. (2012). An Approach to Litter Generation and Littering Practices in a Mexico City Neighborhood. Sustainability 4(8): 1733–1754. doi:10.3390/su4081733.
  • Parliament of Victoria (1997). Litter Act (1987). Act No. 54/1987. Version incorporating amendments as at 1 July 1997, 29 pp.
  • Procházka, O. (2009). Uliční smetky a littering. Odpadové fórum 10(1): 12–14.
  • Přibylová, M. (2009). Průzkum situace volně pohozených odpadů. Odpadové fórum 10(1) : 17–18.
  • Rege, M.; Telle, K. (2001). An Experimental Investigation of Social Norms. Discussion Papers No. 310, October 2001. Statistics Norway, Research Department, 25 pp.
  • Robinson, S.N. (1975). Social and Environmental Influences on Littering Behavior. A dissertation presented to The Faculty of the Division of Graduate Studies and Research, 109 pp.
  • Southeast Environmental Association (2009). Roadside Litter Survey Report 2009, 46 pp. Available at: http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/original/eef_litter09.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2016.
  • State of New South Wales (2013). NSW Litter Prevention Kit, 14 pp. ISBN 978-174359-332-5.
  • Tehan, R.; Jackson, L.; Jeffers, H.; Burns, T. (2017). Beacons of litter: A social experiment to understand how the presence of certain littered items influences rates of littering. Journal of Litter and Environmental Quality 1(1): 5–15.
  • Texas Department of Transportation (2013). 2013 Litter Attitudes And Behaviors. Pre-Campaign Report April 3, 2013. Available at:
  • http://www.dontmesswithtexas.org/docs/DMWT_2013_Attitudes_Behaviors_Full_Report.pdf. Accessed 24 February 2018.
  • The Victorian Litter Action Alliance (2014). Litter Statistics Fact Sheet, 6 pp. Available at: http://www.litter.vic.gov.au/-/media/sv-vlaa/downloads/litter_statistics_fact_sheet_-_2014.pdf?la=en. Accessed 8 March 2016.
  • Torgler, B.; García-Valiñas, M.A.; Macintyre, A. (2008). Justifiability of Littering: An Empirical Investigation. Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts. Working Paper No. 2008, 31 pp.
  • UNEP (2015). Biodegradable Plastics and Marine Litter. Misconceptions, concerns and impacts on marine environments. UNEP, 33 pp. ISBN 978-92-807-3494-2.
  • United Nations (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248.
  • Viscusi, W. Kip; Huber, J.; Bell J.; Cecot, C. (2013). Discontinuous Behavioral Responses to Recycling Laws and Plastic Water Bottle Deposits. American Law and Economics Review 15(1): 110–155.
  • Walls, M. (2011). Deposit-Refund Systems in Practice and Theory. RFF Working Paper DP. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 11–47.
  • Williams, E.; Curnow, R.; Strecker, P. (1997). Understanding Littering Behaviour in Australia. Prepared for the Beverage Industry Environment Council, 88 pp. ISBN 0646326678.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-928f5f71-28a5-48a9-905c-ad9aebdaf053
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.