INVESTIGATING EFL LEARNERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON VOCABULARY LEARNING EXPERIENCES THROUGH SMARTPHONE APPLICATIONS

• Authors: Ebadi Saman , Bashiri Saba
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This study investigated EFL learners’ perspectives about their vocabulary learning experiences via a smartphone application. An online demographic questionnaire was used for recruiting 50 EFL learners from a language teaching channel in Telegram messenger required to use a smartphone application called Vocabulary Flashcards 2016 for a month. After finishing the sampling procedure, the participants were asked to take part in Dialang online diagnostic test to specify their vocabulary level proficiency based on CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference). The quantitative and qualitative data were collected utilizing evaluation questionnaires and semi-structured interviews respectively. The evaluation questionnaire adapted from Chapelle’s (2001) evaluation criterion was used to evaluate the application from the users’ perspectives. This study investigated the effects of learners’ proficiency level and gender differences on using the application, and their perspectives on the negative and positive aspects of the application were also uncovered. The findings showed that the users held positive attitudes towards the application because it influenced their learning positively and provided them with both form and meaning-focused instruction, but they were dissatisfied with the app’s levels and authenticity. Results of independent t-test and ANOVA respectively showed that gender and vocabulary proficiency level did not make significant difference on participants’ app usage patterns. The findings of this study highlighted the users’ localized needs which could be used as guidelines for customized vocabulary apps’ development purposes. The study’s implications for learners, teachers, and app developers are discussed in detail.

Keywords

EN

MALL; smartphones apps; vocabulary learning; evaluation criteria

• Publisher: IATEFL Poland Computer Special Interest Group & University of Nicosia
• Journal: Teaching English with Technology
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 126-151

Contributors

author

Ebadi Saman

• Razi University

author

Bashiri Saba

• Razi University

References

• Amer, M. (2014). Language learners’ usage of a mobile learning application for learning idioms and collocations. CALICO Journal, 31(3), 285-303. doi: 10.11139/cj.31.3.285-302
• Awad, A. K. A., & Alkaraki, S. M. S. (2013). Attitudes of EFL students towards using computers in learning English. ESP-World, 13(37), 1-20. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_37/Sulaiman_Attitudes_of_EFL_students.pdf
• Basal, A., Yilmaz, S., Tanriverdi, A., & Sari, L. (2016). Effectiveness of mobile applications in vocabulary teaching. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(1), 47-59. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.12.008
• Bensalem, E. (2018). The impact of WhatsApp on EFL students' vocabulary learning. Arab World English Journal, 9(1). doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.2
• Burston, J. (2011). Realizing the potential of mobile phone technology for language learning. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 41(2), 56-71. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from https://ialltjournal.org/index.php/ialltjournal/article/download/115/106
• Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching and learning vocabulary for second language learners. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, (4th ed.). (pp. 288-302). Boston: National Geographic Learning.
• Deng, Q., & Trainin, G. (2015). Learning vocabulary with Apps: From theory to practice. The Nebraska Educator: A Student-led Journal. Paper 29. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebeducator/29
• Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gui, L. (2015). Predictability of vocabulary size on learners’ EFL proficiency: Taking VST, CET4 and CET6 as instruments. Studies in Literature and Language, 10(3), 18-23. doi: 10.3968/6679
• Hubbard, P. (2006). Evaluating CALL software. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (eds), Calling on CALL: from Theory and Research to New Directions in Foreign Language Teaching. San Marcos: CALICO. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://web.stanford.edu/~efs/calleval.pdf
• Jamieson, J., Chapelle, C. A., & Preiss, S. (2005). CALL evaluation by developers, a teacher, and students. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 93-138. doi:10.1558/cj.v23i1.93-138
• Javdani, F., Mahboudi, H. R., Ghafoori, N., & Abdullah, A. B. (2011). EFL students’ attitudes towards self-access language learning centers (SALC): The case of Iranian ESP students. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 64-96. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://www.sid.ir/en/VEWSSID/J_pdf/1009720110204.pdf
• Kawauchi, C. (2008). Proficiency differences in CALL based vocabulary learning: The effectiveness of using “PowerWords”. FLEAT, 5, 55-65. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://fleat5.byu.edu/_files/71Kawauchi.pdf
• Lai, C. C., & Kuo, M. M. (2007). Gender difference in CALL programs for English as a Second Language Acquisition. Online Submission. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496190.pdf
• Lai, C., Yeung, Y., & Hu, J. (2016). University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 703-723. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1016441
• Leakey, J. (2011). Evaluating Computer-Assisted Language Learning. An Integrated Approach to Effectiveness Research in CALL. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Leal Alvez, S. M., & de Oliveria. B. F. (2014). Vocabulary acquisition in second language. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(13). Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_13_November_2014/8.pdf
• Leis, A., Tohei, A., & Cooke, S. D. (2015). Smartphone Assisted Language Learning and autonomy. International Journal of Computer-assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 5(3), 75-88. doi: 10.4018/IJCALLT.2015070105
• Lindaman, D., & Nolan, D. (2015). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Application development projects within reach for language teachers. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 45(1), 1-22. doi:10.1111/bjet.12224
• Maleki, H., Ghasemi, A. A., & Moharami, M. (2015). CAVL: Does it develop learner’s attitude? Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 122-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.17718/tojde.18103
• Martiz, G. (2015). Qualitative Case Study on Cell Phone Appropriation for Language Learning Purposes in a Dominican Context (Doctoral dissertation). Logan: Utah State University. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/4414/
• Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2015). Enhancing vocabulary learning through captioned video: An eye-tracking study. The Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 308-328. doi: 10.1111/modl.12215
• Salleh, A. M., & Binti, M. (2010). A Study of Students' Perception of Mobile Learning in Probability Lessons (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Database. (UMI No. 1506902)
• Gourova, E., Asenova, A., Dulev, P. (2013). Integrated platform for mobile learning, In D. Sampson, P. Isaias, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler (eds.), Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age (pp. 67-92). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
• Sanchez, A., & Manchon, R. M. (2007). Research on second language vocabulary acquisition and learning: An introduction. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), vii-xvi.
• Savchenkova, V. B. (2003). Evaluation Criteria for Language Teaching Software: A Delphi Study of Professional Perspectives (Doctoral dissertation). Knoxville: The University of Tennessee. Retrieved from: https://www.editlib.org/p/128412/
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences (3rd. ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
• Shafiei Ebrahimi, Sh. (2016). Effect of digital reading on comprehension of English prose texts in EFL/ESL contexts. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 5(2). doi:10.18488/journal.23/2016.5.2/23.2.111.117
• Soleimani, H., & Morshedian, M. (2013). The relationship between attitude to Computer Assisted Language Learning and language proficiency: Evidence from mobile text message. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 2(5), 523-530.
• Stockwell, G. (2011). Online approaches to learning vocabulary: Teacher-centered or learner-centered? International Journal of Computer-assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 33-44. doi: 10.4018/ijcallt.2011010103
• Suwantarathip, O., & Orawiwatnakul, W. (2015). Using mobile-assisted exercises to support students' vocabulary skill development. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(1), 163-171. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/160575/
• Tabatabaei, O. (2012). The effect of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on learning idiomatic expressions: A case of Iranian EFL students. Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation, 1(1), 119-137. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://lct.iaush.ac.ir/pdf_5126_c7afc190f26c03c24d1a37360720b95b.html
• Vahedi, V. S., Ghonsooly, B., & Pishghadam, R. (2016). Vocabulary glossing: A meta-analysis of the relative effectiveness of different gloss types on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Teaching English with Technology, 16(1), 3-25. Retrieved July 21, 2018 from http://www.tewtjournal.org/?wpdmact=process&did=NDMzLmhvdGxpbms
• Wang, B. T., Teng, C. W., & Chen, H. T. (2015). Using iPad to facilitate English vocabulary learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(2), 100-104. doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.48