Polityka edukacyjna w perspektywie porównawczej

• Authors: Anna Wojciuk

Title variants

EN

Education policy in a comparative perspective. A methodological analysis of the report ‘How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better'

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Recenzja raportu: Mona Mourshed, Chinezi Chijioke i Michael Barber, Jak najlepiej doskonalone systemy szkolne na świecie stają się jeszcze lepsze. Warszawa 2012, Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej (wydanie oryginalne: How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey & Company, 2010).

EN

We discuss the inter-country comparison of education systems and its implications for public policy. The challenges for comparative studies in this field are shown with reference to the influential report ‘How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better’. We claim that inter-country comparisons of education systems should comply with the methodological requirements defined by comparative politics, otherwise the conclusions may be false and may lead to inappropriate policy recommendations.

Keywords

PL

politologia w perspektywie porównawczej; interwencja publiczna; metodologia politologicznych badań porównawczych; międzykrajowe porównanie; polityka edukacyjna; polityka oparta na dowodach

EN

comparative politics; inter-country comparisons; education policy; evidence informed policy; methods in comparative politics; public intervention

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych
• Journal: Edukacja
• Year: 2012
• Issue: 4(120)
• Pages: 120-128

Dates

issued

2012-12-31

Contributors

author

Anna Wojciuk

• Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych

References

• Barber, M. I Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best performing schools come out on top, McKinsey & Company.
• Coffield, F. (2011). Why the McKinsey Reports will not improve school systems. Pobrano z: http://susanohanian.org/show_research.php?id=446
• Davies, H. Nutley, S. i Smith, P. (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
• Geddes, B. (1990). How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis 2(1), 131–150.
• King, G., Keohane, R. i Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: University Press.
• Landmann, T. (2008). Issues and methods in comparative politics, New York: Routledge: 2008.
• MacIntyre, A. (1971). Against the self-images of the age: essays on ideology and philosophy. London: Duckworth.
• Mourshed, M., Chijioke, Ch. i Barber, M. (2012). Jak najlepiej doskonalone systemy szkolne na świecie stają się jeszcze lepsze (wydanie polskie). Warszawa: Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej.
• Sims, Ch., A. (2010). But economics is not an experimental science. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 24(2), 59–68.

Notes

http://www.edukacja.ibe.edu.pl/images/numery/2012/4-8-wojciuk-recenzja-raportu-mckinsey.pdf

Identifiers

ISSN

0239-6858