A systemized explanation for vowel phoneme change in the inadmissible phonological structure /VV/ in Zulu

• Authors: Lionel Posthumus
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article offers a systematic and comprehensive account of vowel changes that take place in the inadmissible phonological sequence /VV/ within a word in Zulu. Instead of discussing vowel changes in terms of vowel coalescence, vowel elision and glide insertion (as is conventionally done) this approach discusses the vowel changes with regard to the position of the two juxtaposed vowel phonemes on the vowel chart. The resultant form is predictable in terms of five basic combinatory possibilities, namely that the first vowel is a higher vowel than the second; the first vowel is a lower vowel than the second; the first vowel is a front vowel while the second is a back vowel; the first vowel is a back vowel while the second is a front vowel or the two vowels in the inadmissible sequence /VV/ are identical vowels. This article furthermore demonstrates that palatalisation is triggered by a semi-vowel generated by the inadmissible phonological structure /VV/ in the case of diminutives and locatives derived from nouns containing a bilabial or alveolar consonant in the final syllable.

Keywords

EN

vowel changes in the inadmissible phonological structure /VV/ in Zulu; vowel; coalescence; vowel deletion; semi-vowel insertion; vowel juxtaposing; vowel hiatus in Zulu

• Publisher: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego
• Journal: Studies in African Languages and Cultures
• Year: 2022
• Issue: 56
• Pages: 9-29

Dates

published

2022-12-13

Contributors

author

Lionel Posthumus

• University of Johannesburg

References

• Harford, C. 1997. “When two vowels go walking: Vowel coalescence in Shona”. Zambezia 34(1). 69-85.
• Herbert, R.K. 1977. “Morphological palatalisation in Southern Bantu: A reply to segment al fusion”. Studies in African Lingusitics 8(2).143-171.
• Kadenge, M. 2010. “Some segmental phonological processes involving vowels in Namyba: A preliminary descriptive account”. The Journal of Pan African Studies 3(6). 239-252.
• Mudzinga, C. & M. Kadenge. 2013. “An analysis of the ghost augment in chiShona”.
• South African Journal of African Languages 33(1). 87-93.
• Mudzinga, C. & M. Kadenge. 2014. “Coalescence as a hiatus resolution strategy in chiKaranga – a dialect of chiShona”. South African Journal of African Languages 34(2). 127-136.
• Mudzinga, C. & M. Kadenge. 2011. “Comparing hiatus resolution in Karanga and Nambya: An Optimality Theoretical account”. Nordic Journal of African Studies 20(3). 203-240.
• Posthumus, L.C. 1978. “‘n Gesistematiseerde verantwoording vir vokaalassimilasie in Zulu”. Limi 6(1, 2). 74-81.
• Sibanda, G. 2011. “Ghost segments in Nguni”. Selected Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African Languages and Linguistics Today, ed. by
• E.G. Bokamba, R.K. Shosted & B.T. Ayalew. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 130-145.
• Sibanda, G. 2009. “Vowel processes in Nguni: Resolving the problem of unacceptable VV sequences”. Selected Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. by M. Matondo, F. Mc Laughlin & E. Potsdam. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. 38-55.
• Simango, S.R. & M. Kadenge. 2014. “Vowel hiatus resolution in ciNsenga: An Optimality Theory analysis”. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 32(1). 79-96.
• Van der Spuy, A. 2014. “Bilabial palatalization in Zulu: A morphologically conditioned phenomenon”. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 44. 71-87.

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32690/56.1