Metodologie indygeniczne w kontekście badań wrażliwych kulturowo

• Authors: Pilarska Justyna

Title variants

EN

Indigenous methodologies in the context of culturally sensitive research

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł ten porusza zagadnienie metodologii indygenicznej, która wpisuje się w szerszą refleksję nad emancypacyjnym paradygmatem badań jakościowych, zorientowanych na lokalne, kulturowo zróżnicowane społeczności. Autorka przedstawia źródła oraz cechy charakterystyczne metodologii indygenicznych, wskazując na ich konkretne przejawy w ramach projektów badawczych z Australii, Kanady i Nowej Zelandii o społeczno-kulturowej proweniencji. W kontekście praktycznym refleksje te mogą posłużyć za inspirację dla kulturowo wrażliwych (dotyczących mniejszości kulturowych lub społeczności wykluczonych), idiograficznych projektów badawczych, wzbogacając nie tylko warsztat badacza, lecz także przyczyniając się do zwiększenia pola świadomych wyborów metodologicznych socjologów, pedagogów, etnografów i innych przedstawicieli europejskich nauk społecznych i humanistycznych.

EN

This article tackles the issue of indigenous methodology, which is a part of a wider reflection over emancipatory paradigm within qualitative inquiry, oriented at local, culturally diverse communities. The author presents the origins and typical features of indigenous methodologies, pointing to their specific exemplification within research designs originating from the social and cultural realm of New Zealand, Australia and Canada. In practical terms, this article can provide an inspiration for the culturally sensitive, idiographic research projects, enriching not only the workshop of a researcher, but also contributing to the widening of the scope of selecting methodology for sociologists, pedagogues, ethnographers and other representatives of the European academia.

Keywords

PL

metodologia indygeniczna; społeczność autochtoniczna; badania jakościowe; paradygmat

EN

indigenous methodology; autochthon community; qualitative research; paradigm

• Publisher: Zakład Edukacji Międzykulturowej i Badań nad Wsparciem Społecznym, Wydziału Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego
• Journal: Multicultural Studies
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 143-158

Dates

published

2018-06-30

Contributors

author

Pilarska Justyna

• Zakład Edukacji Międzykulturowej i Badań nad Wsparciem Społecznym, Wydziału Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

References

• Archibald, J. (1995). Locally developed native studies curriculum: An historical and philosophical rationale. W: M. Batiste & J. Barman (red.). First Nations education in Canada: The circle unfolds (ss. 288–312). Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
• Batiste M. & Henderson, J.Y. (2000). Protecting Indigenous knowledge ad heritage. Saskatoon. Canada: Purich Publishing Ltd.
• Bishop, R. (1996). Whakawhanaungatanga: Collaborative research stories. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
• Brant Castellano, M. (2000). Updating Aboriginal traditions of knowledge. W: G.J. Sefa Dei, B.L. Hall, & D. Goldin Rosenberg (red.), Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: Multiple readings of our world (ss. 21–36). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
• Brown, L. & Strega S. (red.). (2005). Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous, and antioppresive approaches. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Colorado, P. (1988). Bridging Native science and Western science. Convergence, 21(2/3), 49–68.
• Cook-Lynn, E. (1997). Who stole Native American studies? Wicazo Sa Review, 12(1), 9–28.
• Cormier, P. (2010). Lessons from Canada: Indigenous peace building in Aboriginal contexts. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba.
• Creswell, J.W. (2013). Projektowanie badań naukowych. Metody jakościowe, ilościowe i mieszane. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
• Dei, G.S., Hall, B.L., & Rosenberg, D.G. (red.). (2000). Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: Multiple readings of your world. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
• Deloria Jr, V. (1998). Intellectual self-determination and sovereignty: Looking at the windmills in our minds. Wicazo Sa Review, 13(1), 25–31.
• Deloria, V., Jr. (2003). Philosophy and the tribal peoples: Philosophical essays. W: A. Waters (red.), American Indian thought (ss. 3–11). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. W: N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (red.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (ss. 1–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Estey, E., Kmetic, A., & Reading, J. (2008). Knowledge translation in the context of Aboriginal health. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 40(2), 24–39.
• Fleras, A. (2004). Researching together differently: Bridging the research paradigm gap. Native Studies Review, 15(2), 117–130.
• Foucault, M. (1989). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Routledge.
• Gilliland, A. (2011). Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twentyfirst century. Archival Science, 11(3–4), 193–209.
• Green, J. (2007). Taking account of Aboriginal feminism. W: J. Green (red.), Making space for Indigenous feminism (ss. 20–32). Blackpoint & Winnipeg, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.
• Henry, E., & Pene, H. (2001). Kaupapa Maori: Locating indigenous ontology, epistemology and methodology in the academy. Organization, 8(2), 234–242.
• Huntington, H.P. (2000). Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1270–1274.
• Jiménez-Estrada, V.M. (2005). The tree of life as a research methodology. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 34, 44–52.
• Jimerson, R.C. (2007). Archives for all: Professional responsibility and social justice. American Archivist, 70(2), 252–281.
• Jocks, C.R. (1996). Spirituality for sale: Sacred knowledge in the consumer age. American Indian Quarterly, 20(3/4), 415–431.
• Kemmis S., & Wilkinson M. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. W: B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, P. Weeks (red.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (ss. 21–36). New York: Routledge.
• Kirkness, V. & Barnhadt, R. (1991). First nations and higher education: The four R’s – respect, relevance, reciprocity, and responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30(3), 1–15.
• Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
• Kovach, M. (2005). Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies. W L. Brown & S. Strega (red.), Research as resistance: Critical, Indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches (ss. 19–36). Toronto, Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
• Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies. Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
• Kuokkanen, R. (2007). Myths and realities of Sami women: A post-colonial feminist analysis for the decolonization and transformation of Sami society. W: J. Green (red.), Making space for Indigenous feminism (ss. 72–92). Blackpoint & Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.
• Kurtz, D. (2013). Indigenous methodologies. Traversing Indigenous ad Western worldviews in research. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, Vol. 9, Issue 3, 217–229.
• Makokis, J.A. (2008). Nehiyaw iskwew kiskinowâtasinahikewina – paminisowin namôya tipeyimisowin: Learning self-determination though the sacred. Canadian Woman Studies, 26(3/4), 39–50.
• McLeod, N. (2000). Indigenous studies: Negotiating space between the academy and tribal communities. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan Extension Press.
• Morgan, D.L. (2003). Appropriation, appreciation, accommodation: Indigenous wisdoms and knowledges in higher education. International Review of Education, 49(1/2), 35–49.
• Palmer, M.H., Elmore, R.D., Watson, M.J., Kloesel, K., & Palmer, K. (2009). Xoa:dau to Maunkaui: Integrating indigenous knowledge into an undergraduate earth systems science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(2), 137–144.
• Pilarska, J. (2017). Culturally sensitive research – on theory and some good examples. W: U. Markowska-Manista & Pilarska J. (red.). An introspective approach to women’s intercultural fieldwork: female researches’narrations based on their intercultural experiences from the field (ss. 148–178). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
• Ray, L. (2012). Deciphering the “indigenous” in indigenous methodologies. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 85–98
• Rigney, L. (1999). Internationalization of an indigenous anti-colonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo Sa Review, 14(2), 109–121.
• Ritenburg H., et al. (2014). Embodying decolonization. Methodologies and ingienization. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 67–80.
• Rubin A., Babbie, E. (2009). Research Methods for Social Work. Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
• Said, E.W. (1978). Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage.
• Sanford, K., Williams, L., Hopper, T., & McGregor, C. (2012). Indigenous principles informing teacher education: What we have learned. Education, 18(2), 18–34.
• Simpson, L. (2000a). Anishnaabe ways of knowing. W: J. Oakes, R. Riewe, S. Koolage, L. Simpson & N. Schuster (red.), Aboriginal health, identity and resources (ss. 165– 185). Winnipeg, Canada: Department of Native Studies.
• Smith, G. (2005). The problematic of ‘indigenous theorizing’: A critical reflection. AERA Annual Conference (pp. 1–15). Montreal, Canada: AERA.
• Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed Books.
• Smith, L.T. (2005). On tricky ground – researching the native in the age of uncertainty. W: N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (red.). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Schnarch, B. (2004). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: Critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 80–95.
• Stewart, G.M. (2007). Kaupapa Maori science. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
• Trouillot, M. (1995). Silencing the past: Power and the production of history. Boston: Beacon.
• Turner, N.J., Gregory, R., Brooks, C., Failing, L. & Satterfield, T. (2008). From invisibility to transparency: Identifying the implications. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 7–20.
• Viergever, M. (1999). Indigenous Knowledge: An Interpretation of Views from Indigenous Peoples. W: L.M. Semali & J.L. Kincheloe (red.), What is indigenous knowledge? Voices from the Academy, Ladislaus M. Semali & Joe L. Kincheloe (red.) (ss. 333–359). New York: Garland Pub.
• Walker, S. (1996). Kia tau te rangimarie: Kaupapa Maori theory as a resistance against the construction of Maori as the other. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
• Weber-Pillwax, C. (2001). What is indigenous research? The Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 166–174.
• Weber-Pillwax, C. (2004). Indigenous researchers and Indigenous research methods: Cultural influences or cultural determinants of research methods. Pimatisiwin: Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 2(1), 77–90.
• Wehi, P.M. (2009). Indigenous ancestral sayings contribute to modern conservation partnerships: Examples using Phormium tenax. Ecological Applications, 19(1), 267–275.
• Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax & Winnipeg, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.

Identifiers

ISSN

2451-2877

DOI

10.23734/mcs.2018.1.143.158