2016 | 3(45) | 137-144
Article title

Towards the Ontology of Places in Poland: an Example of the Mazowieckie Voivodship

Title variants
W stronę ontologii miejscowości w Polsce: przykład województwa mazowieckiego
Languages of publication
The main goal of our research is to build the ontology of places in Poland covering variety of aspects of places, mainly administrative and socio-economic. In the paper, we show a part of the ontology on the example of the Mazowieckie Voivodship. The ontology is being implemented using the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language.
Głównym celem badań jest stworzenie ontologii miejscowości w Polsce obejmującej różnorodne ich aspekty, przede wszystkim administracyjne oraz socjoekonomiczne. W artykule przedstawiony został fragment ontologii na przykładzie Województwa Mazowieckiego. Ontologia jest implementowana w języku OWL 2 Web Ontology Language.
  • University of Rzeszów, Poland
  • University of Rzeszów, Poland
  • University of Management and Administration in Zamość, Poland
  • Fellbaum, C. ed. 1998. WordNet. An Electronic Lexical Database, Language, speech, and communication. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  • Gómez-Pérez, A., M. Fernández-López, and O. Corcho. 2004. Ontological Engineering. With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Guarino, N., and P. Giaretta. 1995. “Ontologies and Knowledge Bases Towards a Terminological Clarification.” In Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases, edited by N.J.I. Mars, 25–32. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Kohler, J., S. Philippi, M. Specht, and A. Ruegg. 2006. “Ontology Based Text Indexing and Querying for the Semantic Web.” Knowledge-Based Systems no. 19 (8):744–754. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2006.04.015.
  • Musen, M.A. 2015. “The Protégé Project: A Look Back and a Look Forward.” AI Matters no. 1 (4):4–12. doi: 10.1145/2757001.2757003.
  • Nastase, V., P. Nakov, D. Ó Séaghdha, and S. Szpakowicz. 2013. Semantic Relations Between Nominals. Edited by G. Hirst, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Toronto: Morgan & Claypool.
  • Neches, R., R. Fikes, T. Finin, T. Gruber, R. Patil, T. Senator, and W.R. Swartout. 1991. “Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing.” AI Magazine no. 12 (3):36–56.
  • Pancerz, K. 2012. “Toward Information Systems over Ontological Graphs.” In Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, edited by J. Yao, Y. Yang, R. Słowiński, S. Greco, H. Li, S. Mitra and L. Polkowski, 243–248. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Pawlak, Z. 1991. Rough Sets. Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Theory and Decision Library Series D, System Theory, Knowledge Engineering, and Problem Solving. Dordrecht-Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Suraj, Z., P. Grochowalski, and K. Pancerz. 2013. “Knowledge Representation and Automated Methods of Searching for Information in Bibliographical Data Bases: A Rough Set Approach.” In Rough Sets and Intelligent Systems — to the Memory of Professor Zdzislaw Pawlak. Vol. 2, edited by A. Skowron and Z. Suraj, 515–538. New York: Springer.
  • Wykaz identyfikatorów i nazw jednostek podziału terytorialnego kraju. Podział terytorialny z dnia 1.01.2015 r. 2015. Zeszyty Metodyczne i Klasyfikacje. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.