Japońskie badania nad historią Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem współczesnej historii Polski

• Authors: Hayasaka Makoto

Title variants

EN

Japanese Studies on the history of the Central-Eastern Europe with some remarks for contemporary history of Poland

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The paper focuses on the viewpoints of Japanese historians upon the Polish modern history. The year 2018 is anniversary for Japan as 150 years of Meiji Revolution (Meiji Ishin), as well as for Poles this year is anniversary as 100 years of Independence. If it would stand on the comparative studies for the modernization of XIX-XX centuries, we can observe the similar motives in the Polish uprisings. During the process from the partitions of Poland to Versailles treaty, may be to Riga treaty, the former noble republic was separated to five national states, like Poland, Lithuania, Byelorussia, Ukraine and Israel. In this context Japanese unification was not exception of the modern history. Japanese thinkers like Yukichi Fukuzawa applied for Meiji state to introduce the western constitutionalism, either monarchical or republican system. His viewpoints remind us the political selections, discussed among polish emigrés thinkers. At the stage of imperialism national unification idea was advanced by Roman Dmowski as integral nationalism which influenced strongly upon the neighbor national leaders aiming at their own national integration. Against this chauvinistic integral nationalism, locality idea (idea krajowa) opposed decidedly. Their leaders Michał Römer in Lithuania- Byelorussia and Wacław Lipiński in Ukraine propagated to enlighten the peasantry, to foster their culture and to establish local autonomy. Their attitudes remind us propositions of Japanese thinkers Inezou Nitobe and Kunio Yanagida. After the second world war many Japanese historians accepted Marxist methodology, and the studies of Polish modern history in Japan was disfigured by Marxist one lineal historical research. But now this viewpoint was revised as result of the decline of soviet régime, and our younger generation took multi-lineal analysis of historical research, relying upon the French historical school „Annales”. In this direction above mentioned Yanagida’s methodology was welcomed. To consider the 150 years of anniversary of Meiji Ishin for Japan and 100 years of anniversary of independence of Poland, undoubtedly should require the comparative studies.

Keywords

EN

modern history; national unification; Meiji Ishin; polish uprising; locality idea; comparative studies

• Publisher: Oficyna Wydawnicza Arboretum
• Journal: Wschodnioznawstwo
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 12
• Pages: 369-381

Contributors

author

Hayasaka Makoto

• Tokijski Instytut Technologiczny

References

• Aktcoura Oglou Yousouf Bey, L’oeuvre historique de Mustapha Djelalettin Pacha et ses points de vue sur l’histoire des Turcs. Resumés des Communications presentées au Congrès, t. II, Varsovie 1933.
• Bando, H., Po-rando-jin to Nichiro-Sensou, Tokio 1995.
• Bando, H., Po-rando kakumei-shi-kenkyuu, Tokio 1968.
• Bando, H., Yo-roppa. Po-rando. Rosia. 1918-1921, Tokio 2008.
• Duchiński, F., La Moscovie et la Pologne, Constantinople 1855.
• Duchiński, F., Question d’Orient, Constantinople 1853.
• Eguchi, B., Teikoku-Shugi-no-Jidai, Tokio 1975.
• Fukuzawa, Y., Bunmeiron-no Garyaku, Tokio 1875.
• Grabski, A.F., Na manowcach myśli historycznej. Historiozofia Franciszka H. Duchińskiego, [in:] A.F. Grabski, Perspektywy przeszłości, Lublin 1983.
• Hayashi, S., Kaikoku Heidan, 1787-1791.
• Handelsman, M., Adam Czartoryski, t. I-III, Warszawa 1948-1950.
• Kakulin, N., Melikov, V., Voyna s belopolyakami, Moskva 1925.
• Kieniewicz, S., Historyk a świadomość narodowa, Warszawa 1982.
• Kieniewicz, S., La pensée de Mazzini et le mouvement national slave, Roma 1974.
• Kieniewicz, S., La Turquie et l’indépendence de la Pologne au XIXe siècle, „Belleten” 1983, vol. 47, nr 186.
• Kieniewicz, S., L’Italie et l’insurrection polonaise de 1863, Wrocław 1975.
• Kieniewicz, S., Sprawa włościańska a powstanie styczniowe, Warszawa 1953.
• Kohn, H., Prophets and Peoples. Studies in Nineteenth Century Nationalism, New York 1947.
• Kołodzejczyk, D., Whose Nations? Mustafa Djelaleddin between Ottomanism and Turkism, [in:] Crimean War 1853-1856. Colonial Skirmish or Rehearsal for World War? Empires, Nations, and Individuals, J. Borejsza (ed.), Warszawa 2011.
• Kyoudo no Kenkyuu, I. Nitobe, K. Yanagida (eds.), Tokio 1912.
• Lipiński, W., Szlachta na Ukrainie, Kijów 1906.
• Łątka, J., Pasza z Lehistanu. Mustafa Dżlaleddin (Konstanty Borzęcki), Kraków 1993.
• Maruyama, M., Nihon-Seiji-shisoushi Kenkyuu, Tokio 1952.
• Mizuguchi, S., Numata, J., Benyofusuki Koukai-ki, Tokio 1970.
• Mierosławski, L., De la nationalité polonaise dans l’équilivre européen, Paris 1856.
• Mustapha Djelaleddin Pacha, Les turcs anciens et modernes, Constantinople 1869.
• Nitobe, I., Bushido. The Soul of Japan, Tokio 1899.
• Nitobe, I., Nougyou-Honron, Tokio 1898.
• Römer, M., Litwa. Studium. Odrodzenie narodu litewskiego, Lwów 1908.
• Sokołowska, S., Młoda Polska z dziejów ugrupowań demokratycznych Wielkiej Emigracji, Warszawa 1872.
• Świętochowski, A., Wskazania polityczne, [in:] Ognisko. Księga ku czci T.T. Jeża, Warszawa 1882.
• Tarle, Y.V., Krymskaya voyna, Moskva 1961.
• Tokai, S., Kijin no kiguu, Tokio 1885.
• Toriyama, S., Pe-Enu-Milyukofu to Roshia Kokka-Gakuha, „Slavu-Kenkyuu” 1968, nr 12.
• Toriyama, S., Roshia to Yo-roppa, suravushugi to han-suravushugi, Tokio 1949.
• Yanagida, K., Jidai to Nousei, Tokio 1910.
• Żychowski, M., Ludwik Mierosławski 1814-1878, Warszawa 1963.