Efektywność usług teleradiologicznych

• Authors: Świerczyńska-Kaczor Urszula

Title variants

The effectiveness of teleradiology

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Oceniając efektywność teleradiologii, należy uwzględnić zmiany, jakie niesie za sobą to rozwiązanie w obszarach jakości usług diagnostycznych, kosztów oraz dostępności usług diagnostycznych. Prowadzona analiza wskazuje, iż z teleradiologią wiążą się zarówno pozytywne, jak i negatywne efekty wdrożeń. W artykule zaprezentowano także wyniki badań postaw lekarzy radiologów wobec tej nowej formy pracy.

EN

The article raises the issue of how the implementation of teleradiology affects three main aspects of effectiveness: the quality of radiology, the costs of medical services and the access to medical imaging services. The teleradiology leads both to positive and negative changes in these areas. Reduction in the cost of delivering services, improvement to the access to medical care and improvement of quality of diagnosis due to medical consultations or online workshops for doctors, are the positive sides of teleradiology. On the other hand, teleradiology may lead to decreased quality of diagnosis and even hamper the development of imaging medicine. This is one of the main negative concerns, others include such matters as the cost of implementation of the teleradiological infrastructure and the international legal ramifications of remote diagnosis. The article also includes the results of a survey on how Polish radiologists perceive the pros and cons of telework.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Problemy Zarządzania
• Year: 2011
• Issue: 3/2011 (33)
• Pages: 211-226

Dates

published

2011-07-30

Contributors

author

Świerczyńska-Kaczor Urszula

References

• Benjamin, M., Aradi, Y. i􀁢 R. Shreiber 2010. From Shared Data to Sharing Workflow: Merging PACS and Teleradiology. European Journal of Radiology, nr 73, s. 3–9.
• Boland, G.W.L. 2009. Teleradiology for Auction: T he Radiologist Commoditized and How to Prevent It. Journal Of The American College Of Radiology, nr 3 (6), s, 137–138.
• Demiris, G., Edison, K. i􀁢S. Vijaykumar 2005. A comparison of communication models of traditional and video-mediated health care delivery. International Journal of Medical Informatics, nr 74, s. 851–856.
• Eranki, V., Munt, J., Lim, M.J. i􀁢 R. Atkinson 2010. Consultation of Orthopaedics Cases Using Multimedia Messaging Services. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, nr 4, s. 164–168.
• Heautot, J.-F., Gibaud, B., Catroux, B., Thoreux, P.-H., Cordonnier, E., Scarabin, J.-M.,
• Carsin, M. i􀁢 Y. Gandon 1999. Infuence of The Teleradiology Technology (N-ISDN and ATM) on The Inter-Hospital Management Of Neurosurgical Patients. Medical Informatics, nr 2 (24), s. 121–134.
• Hoe Ng, W., Wang, E. i􀁢I. Ng 2007. Multimedia Messaging Service teleradiology in the provision of emergency neurosurgery services. Surgical Neurology, nr 67, s. 338–341.
• Kennedy, S., Bhargavan, M., Sunshine, J.H. i􀁢H.P. Forman 2009. The Effect of Teleradiology on Time to Interpretation for CT Pulmonary Angiographic Studies. Journal of the American College of Radiology, nr 3 (6). Lexa, F., Berlin, J.W., Boland, G.W.L., Smith, G.G., Jensen, M.D., Seidenwurm, D.J.,
• Hoppe, R. i􀁢 R. Stroud, Jr. 2009. ACR White Paper: Task Force to Evaluate the Value Add Impact on Business Models. Journal of the American College of Radiology, nr 10 (6).
• Lundberg, N., Wintell, M. i􀁢 L. Lindsköld 2010. The future progress of teleradiology – An empirical study in Sweden. European Journal of Radiology, nr 73, s. 10–19.
• Medimage 2010. http://medimage.com.pl/aktualnosci/136-powstaje-polska-sie-teleradio logii-alliance-medical, odczyt: 19.02.1011.
• Monaghan, D.A., Kassak K.M. i􀁢 H.M.K. Ghomrawi 2006. Determinants of Radiologists’ Productivity in Private Group Practices in California. American College of Radiology, nr 3, s. 108–114.
• Pattynama, P.M.T. 2010. Legal aspects of cross-border teleradiology. European Journal of Radiology, nr 73, s. 26–30.
• Pechet, T.C.M., Girard, G. i􀁢B. Walsh 2010. The value teleradiology represents for Europe: A study of lessons learned in the U.S. European Journal of Radiology, nr 73.
• Platts-Mills, T.F., Hendey G.W. i􀁢 B. Ferguson 2010. Teleradiology Interpretations Of Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, nr 2 (38), s. 188–195, 201.
• Reponen, J., Niinimaki, J., Kumpulainen, T., Ilkko, E., Karttunen, A. i􀁢 P. Jartti 2005. Mobile teleradiology with smartphone terminals as a􀁢 part of a􀁢 multimedia electronic patient record. International Congress Series, nr 1281, s. 916–921.
• Ross, P., Sepper, R. i􀁢H. Pohjonen 2010. Cross-border teleradiology—Experience from two international teleradiology projects. European Journal of Radiology, nr 73, s. 20–25.
• Ruotsalainen, P. 2010. Privacy and security in teleradiology. European Journal of Radiology, nr 73, s. 31–35.
• Tie, M. i􀁢B. Koczwara 2004. Quality improvement through teleradiology: Opportunities and Challenges. Australasian Radiology, nr 48, s. 476–479.
• Wong, W.S., Roubal I., Jackson D.B., Paik W.N. i V.K.J. Wonga 2005. Outsourced Teleradiology Imaging Services: An Analysis of Discordant Interpretation in 124,870 Cases. Journal of the American College of Radiology, nr 6 (2), s. 478–484.
• Yakel, E. 2001. An Institutional View of Electronic Records Management: Hostpitals Teleradiology. The Information Management Journal, nr 1 (35), s. 26–31.

Identifiers

ISSN

1644-9584