Ratings of innovative developments as indicators of developmental problems in the region

• Authors: Baksha Nadezhda , Vakorin Dmitry , Sharapova Tatyana

Title variants

PL

Ratingi rozwoju innowacyjnego jako wskaźniki problemów rozwojowych w regionie

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

PL

Celem badania jest identyfikacja problemów gospodarczych w ramach regionalnej polityki innowacji. W tym przypadku procedura ratingowa jest wykorzystywana jako narzędzie metodologiczne do wskazywania błędów strategicznych generowanych decyzjami administracyjnymi w dziedzinie innowacji. Badacze wysuwają hipotezę, że ratingi mogą służyć jako wskaźniki regionalnego innowacyjnego rozwoju, wskazując obszary problematyczne; jednak nie są one w pełni brane pod uwagę przy dostosowywaniu regionalnej strategii innowacji. Autorzy wykorzystują dane statystyczne regionu Tiumeń, aby przetestować analizowane podejście. Przykładowo znaczniki oceny są wykorzystywane jako innowacyjne wskaźniki rozwoju (technika oferowana przez National Research University „Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii” i metoda A.B. Guseva). Wyniki pokazują, że pomimo pozytywnej dynamiki ogólnego ratingu regionu Tiumeń, nadal istnieją niektóre problemy innowacyjnego rozwoju.

EN

This research aims at identifying economic problems within regional policy of innovation. In this case, rating procedure is employed as a methodological tool to indicate strategic errors, generated by administrative decisions in the field of innovation. The researchers come up with a hypothesis that ratings can serve as indicators of regional innovative development pointing out problematic areas, yet ratings are not fully taken into account while adjusting regional innovation strategy. The authors apply the Tyumen region statistical data to test the presented approach. For example, rating markers are used as innovative development indicators (a technique offered by National Research University “Higher School of Economics” and A.B. Gusev’s method). The results show that, despite the positive dynamics of the Tyumen region general rating, certain innovative development problems still remain.

Keywords

PL

scenariusz innowacyjnego rozwoju rating; wskaźnik innowacyjnego rozwoju; indeks innowacyjnego rozwoju.

EN

innovative development scenario rating; innovative development indicator; index of innovative development.

• Publisher: Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne w Zielonej Górze
• Journal: Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego w Zielonej Górze
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 9
• Pages: 35 - 46

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Baksha Nadezhda

• Tyumen State University

author

Vakorin Dmitry

• Tyumen State University

author

Sharapova Tatyana

• Tyumen State University

References

• Amosenok E., Bazhanov A. (2006), Integral Assessment of the Innovation Potential of Russian regions, "Region: Economics and Sociology", vol. 2, pp. 134-145
• Analytical Reports' ratings of innovative development of the Russian Federation (2012, 2013, 2014). NIU HSE, Moscow.
• Anderson A. M. (1984), Science and Technology in Japan, Longman, Harlow.
• Barska A., Jędrzejczak-Gas J., Wyrwa J. (2017), Innovative activity of the enterprises in the service sector in Poland, in: Central European Conference in Finance and Economics - CEFE 2017, Technical University of Košice, pp. 57-69.
• Canberra Manual (1995), The Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to Science and Technology, OECD, Paris, available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-andtechnology/the-measurement-of-scientific-and-technological-activities_19900414 (1.11.2016).
• European Innovation Scoreboard (2003), available at: http://www.proinnoeurope.eu/extranet/admin/uploaded_documents/innovation_scoreboard (15.02.2016).
• European Innovation Scoreboard (2013), available at: http://www.trendchard.org (10.02.2016).
• Fedorova I., Startseva Yu., Inyukhina E. (2006), Components of "economy of knowledge", “EKO”. No. 12, pр. 59-66.
• Feifei T., Zhaohua L. (2015), Interaction Characteristics and Development Pattern of Sustainability System in BHR (Bohai Rim) and YRD (Yangtze River) regions, China, "Journal Eсological Informatics", Vol. 30, pр. 29-39, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf. 2015.09.008.
• Fic M., Graczyk M., Stankiewicz J., Wyrwa J., Jędrzejczak-Gas J., Wysocki R. (eds.) (2005), Lubuskie Regional Innovation Strategy: diagnosis structure system, Zielona Góra.
• Forrester J. (1971), World Dinamics, Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge.
• OECD (2002), Frascati Manual 2002, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, available at: http://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/Frascati.pdf (1.11.2016).
• Gabor D., Colombo U., King A., Galli R. (1981), Beyond the Age of Waste. A Report to the Club of Rome, Pergamon Press, Oxford – New York, available at: http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/10262140?selectedversion=NBD1897037 (1.11.2016).
• Golub A., Strukov E. (2010), Economics of Natural Resources, Aspect-press, Moscow.
• Grobbelaar S., Nigel G-E., Brent A. (2016), From Enterprise Development to Inclusive Innovation – A Systemic Instruments Framework for Regional Innovation Support, “African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development”, vol. 8, pp. 233-246, https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2016.1159401.
• Gusev A. (2013), Forming of the Ratings of Innovative Development of Russia's Regions and Recommendations to Stimulate Innovative Activity of the Russian Federation. Available at: http://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/rejting_regionov_rossii_po_urovnyu_innovac ionnogo_razvitiya/(date of access: 15.07.2016).
• Independent Institute for Social Policy. Social Atlas of Russian Regions. Integral index: the index of innovation, available at: http://rethinkingrussia.ru/en/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/Think-Tank-Atlas.pdf (25.01.2016).
• Kazmierczyk J., Aptacy M. (2016), Management of the Purposes in Banks: Polish case. “Business and Problems of Stability”, vol. 4 (2). pp. 146-158.
• Kimiltae N. (2013), A Study on Measurement of Regional Knowledge Competitiveness Index in Korea: Using World Knowledge Competitiveness Index. “Journal of Economics Studies”, vol. 31, pp. 51-76.
• Koptug V. (1992), Conference of the UN on the Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro. Information review. Novosibirsk, available at: http://www.prometeus.nsc.ru/koptyug/works/w1992.ssi (15.06.2015).
• Kortov C. (2004), Analysis of Innovative Development of the Territory on the Basis of the Evolutionary Approach, “Innovation”, vol. 6, pp. 25-33.
• Kuzyk B., Yakovets Y. (2005), Russia – 2050: Strategy of Innovative Breakthrough. Economics, Moscow, available at: https: http://misk.inesnet.ru/2005/03/russia-2050-strategyof-innovative-break-through (15.06.2015).
• Lavrinenko, O., Jefimovs N., Teivāns-Treinovskis J. (2017), Issues in the Area of Secure Development: Trust as an Innovative System’s Economic Growth Factor of Border Regions (Latvia-Lithuania-Belarus), “Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues” 6(3): pp. 435-444, http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi. 2017.6.3(9).
• Matrosov V. (1993), Analysis of Development Instability on the Base of Mathematical Modeling. Preprints of Second Intern. Workshop, The Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
• Meadows D., Meadows D., Randers J., Behrens III.W. (1975), The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Potomac Associates Book, New York.
• Miosga M., Hafner S. (2014), Regional Development in the Sign of the Big Transformation. Strategies for Resource Efficiency, Demographic Change and Innovation Ability, Oekom publishing company, Munich, DOI: 10.1007s13147-015-0349-4.
• Schwerdtner W., Siebert R., Busse M., Freisinger U. (2015), Regional Open Innovation Roadmapping: A New Framework for Innovation-Based Regional Development. “Sustanability”, vol. 7, pp. 2301-2321.
• OECD (1997), Oslo Manual: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activity, OECD Publishing, Paris, available at: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-andtechnology/the-measurement-of-scientific-and-technological-activities_19900414 (1.11.2016).
• Rajahonka M., Pienonen T., Kuusisto R., Handelberg Y. (2015), Orchestrators of Innovation-Driven Regional Development: Experiences from the INNOFOKUS Project and Change 2020 Programme, “Technology Innovation Management Review”, vol. 5(10), pp. 52- 62.
• Shtertser T. (2005), Empirical Analysis of the Factors of Innovation Activity in the Regions of Russia, "Vestnik NGU", vol. 2, pp. 100-109.
• Rating of Innovative Regions of Russia (2017), Version 2016, available at: http://www.iregions.org/images/files/presentations/AIRR_26.12.pdf (date of access: 1.05.2017).
• Sukhovey A. (2014), The Problems of Providing Innovative Security In Russia. “The Economy of the Region”, vol. 4, pp. 141-150.
• Skawinska E. (2014), Innovativity of Enterprises – Barriers and Means of their Decrease (example of Wielkopolska Region), “Scientific Journal of Polish Economic Society in Zielona Gora”, vol. 1, pp. 6-17
• The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016 (2015). World Economic Forum, available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015- 2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf (20.05.2016).
• Matrosov V., Levashov V. Demyanko U. (2000), Problems of global security and a new paradigm of sustainable development of civilization, in: Koptyug V., Matrosov V., Levashov V. Koptyug V. (ed.), The New Paradigm of Development of Russia in XXI century, Akademia, Moscow, available at: http://www.prometeus.nsc.ru/koptyug/ideas/paradigm/ (10.01.2016).
• The science. Innovation. The Information Society (2015), Short Statistical Book. Mr. Abdrakhmanov N., Gorodnikova L. “Hochberg et al. Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, HSE, vailable at: https://www.hse.ru/en/org/projects/211257385 (15.02.2016).
• Tyumen Statistics (2015), available at: http://tumstat.gks.ru (11.04.2016).
• Varshavsky A. (2005), An Innovative Way of Development for the New Russia, in: V.P. Goregliad (ed.), Innovativer Entwicklungspfad für das neue Russland, Nauka, Moscow, pp. 201-204.
• Noronha T., Vicente G. (2015), Innovative Firms Behind the Regions: Analysis of Regional Innovation Performance in Portugal by External Logistic Biplots, “European Urban and Regional Studies”, vol. 22, pp. 329-344.
• Yinghua S., Bingsheng L., Xueqing W. (2015), The Energy Efficiency of China's Regional Construction Industry Based on the Three-Stage DEA Model and the DEA-DA Model. “Journal оf Civil Engineering", vol. 20, pр. 34-47, DOI: 10.1007/s12205–015–0553– 3.
• Zadumkin K., Kondakov I. (2010), The Methodology of Comparative Evaluation of the Scientific and Technical Potential of the Region, “Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast”, vol. 4 (12), pp. 86-100.
• Ziolkowski B. (2015), Regional Development Management in the Context of Axiological Aspects of Regional Innovation Strategies,[in:] CERS 2014: 5TH Central European Conference in Regional Science, International Conference Proceedings, pp. 1188- 1197.

Identifiers

DOI

10.26366/PTE.ZG.2018.133