Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 3(45) | 115-127

Article title

Residents’ Opinions about the Influence of Public Green Space on Prices of Residences - the Case of Poznań, Poland

Title variants

PL
Wpływ zieleni publicznej na ceny mieszkań w opinii mieszkańców. Poznań — case study

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The influence of public green space on the value of real estate has been proven many times in different publications. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate which factors, in Poznań inhabitants’ opinions, influenced the real estate value and if residents of individual parts of the city noticed the influence of public green space on the value of their real estate. From April to July 2015 we conducted preliminary research on asking prices of residences in Poznań (n = 480). We conducted quantitative analysis (n = 366) for a questionnaire survey. The most expensive residences in Poznań are located in the sector with the greatest amount of public green space. However, in spite of the fact that there had been proven differences in the prices of residences, only a slight majority of respondents (54%) saw the influence of green space on these prices. In our study the respondents indicated that the choice of residences was mostly influenced by the price and living space area. Only 1 out of more than 12 respondents found access to public green space to be important for making a decision about the choice of residences. Green space in Poznań is poorly used as a tool increasing the attractiveness of public space in the city and the city inhabitants are too rarely aware of the fact that it influences real estate value.
PL
Wpływ zieleni publicznej na wartość nieruchomości został już wiele razy udowodniony w różnych publikacjach, dlatego celem artykułu było zbadanie, jakie czynniki — według mieszkańców Poznania — mają wpływ na wartość nieruchomości i czy mieszkańcy poszczególnych części miasta zauważają wpływ zieleni publicznej na wartość swoich nieruchomości. W okresie kwiecień–lipiec 2015 roku przeprowadzono kwerendę ofertowych cen mieszkań w Poznaniu (n = 480 ). W celu wykonania badań ankietowych posłużono się analizą ilościową. W Poznaniu najdroższe mieszkania zlokalizowane są w sektorze o największym udziale zieleni publicznej, jednak pomimo wcześniej wykazanych różnic w cenach mieszkań, tylko nieznaczna większość respondentów (54% ) dostrzega wpływ zieleni na cenę mieszkania. W badaniu respondenci wskazywali, że w największym stopniu na wybór mieszkania wpływały: cena oraz powierzchnia mieszkalna. Zaledwie dla 1 na ponad 12 osób ważna przy wyborze mieszkania była dostępność zieleni publicznej. Tereny zieleni w Poznaniu są słabo wykorzystywanym narzędziem zwiększenia atrakcyjności przestrzeni publicznych miasta oraz są zbyt rzadko funkcjonującym w świadomości mieszkańców czynnikiem wpływającym na wartość nieruchomości.

Contributors

  • Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland
  • Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland
  • Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland
  • Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland

References

  • Ahern, J., S. Cilliers, and J. Niemela. 2014. “The Concept of Ecosystem Services in Adaptive Urban Planning and Design: a Framework for Supporting Innovation.” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 125:254–259. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020.
  • Anderson, S.T., and S.E. West. 2006. “Open Space, Residential Property Values, and Spatial Context.” Regional Science and Urban Economics no. 36 (6):773–789. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007.
  • Bonenberg, W. 2011. “”Urban sprawl” jako zagrożenie tożsamości miasta.” Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Architektura i Urbanistyka (23):7–14.
  • Chen, W.Y., and C.Y. Jim. 2008. “Assessment and Valuation of the Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Forests.” In Ecology, Planning, and Management of Urban Forests. International Perspectives, edited by M.M. Carreiro, Y.-C. Song and J. Wu, 53–83. New York: Springer.
  • Chiesura, A. 2004. “The Role of Urban Parks for the Sustainable City.” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 68 (1):129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003.
  • Cohen, D.A., T.L. McKenzie, A. Sehgal, S. Williamson, D. Golinelli, and N. Lurie. 2007. “Contribution of Public Parks to Physical Activity.” American Journal of Public Health no. 97 (3):509–514. doi: 10.2105/Ajph.2005.072447.
  • Conedera, M., A. Del Biaggio, K. Seeland, M. Moretti, and R. Home. 2015. “Residents’ Preferences and Use of Urban and Peri-Urban Green Spaces in a Swiss Mountainous Region of the Southern Alps.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening no. 14 (1):139–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.01.003.
  • Conway, D., C.Q. Li, J. Wolch, C. Kahle, and M. Jerrett. 2010. “A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics no. 41 (2):150–169. doi: 10.1007/s11146–008–9159–6.
  • Eriksson, L., A. Nordlund, O. Olsson, and K. Westin. 2012. “Beliefs about Urban Fringe Forests among Urban Residents in Sweden.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening no. 11 (3):321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.004.
  • Gibbons, S., S. Mourato, and G.M. Resende. 2014. “The Amenity Value of English Nature: a Hedonic Price Approach.” Environmental & Resource Economics no. 57 (2):175–196. doi: 10.1007/s10640–013–9664–9.
  • Gill, S., J. Handley, A. Ennos, and S. Pauleit. 2007. “Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of The Green Infrastructure.” Built Environment no. 3 (1):115–133.
  • He, C.J., Z. Wang, H.C. Guo, H. Sheng, R. Zhou, and Y.H. Yang. 2010. “Driving Forces Analysis for Residential Housing Price in Beijing.” International Conference on Ecological Informatics and Ecosystem Conservation (Iseis 2010) no. 2:925–936. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.104.
  • James, P., K. Tzoulas, M.D. Adams, A. Barber, J. Box, J. Breuste, T. Elmqvist, M. Frith, C. Gordon, K.L. Greening, J. Handley, S. Haworth, A.E. Kazmierczak, M. Johnston, K. Korpela, M. Moretti, J. Niemela, S. Pauleit, M.H. Roe, J.P. Sadler, and C.W. Thompson. 2009. “Towards an Integrated Understanding of Green Space in the European Built Environment.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening no. 8 (2):65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001.
  • Jim, C.Y., and W.Y. Chen. 2006. “Impacts of Urban Environmental Elements on Residential Housing Prices in Guangzhou (China).” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 78 (4):422–434. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.003.
  • Jim, C.Y., and W.Y. Chen. 2010. “External Effects of Neighbourhood Parks and Landscape Elements on High-Rise Residential Value.” Land Use Policy no. 27 (2):662–670. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.027.
  • Jim, C.Y., and X.Z. Shan. 2013. “Socioeconomic Effect on Perception of Urban Green Spaces in Guangzhou, China.” Cities no. 31:123–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.017.
  • Kattwinkel, M., R. Biedermann, and M. Kleyer. 2011. “Temporary Conservation for Urban Biodiversity.” Biological Conservation no. 144 (9):2335–2343. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.012.
  • Kazmierczak, A. 2013. “The Contribution of Local Parks to Neighbourhood Social Ties.” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 109 (1):31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.007.
  • Kotus, J. 2006. “Changes in the Spatial Structure of a Large Polish City — the Case of Poznan.” Cities no. 23 (5):364–381. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2006.02.002.
  • Kotus, J. 2013. “Position of the Polish City on the Ladder of Public Participation: Are We Going the Right Way? The Case of Poznan.” Cities no. 35:226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.08.001.
  • Krellenberg, K., J. Welz, and S. Reyes-Packe. 2014. “Urban Green Areas and Their Potential for Social Interaction. A Case Study of a Socio-Economically Mixed Neighbourhood in Santiago de Chile.” Habitat International no. 44:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.004.
  • Liu, C.F., and X.M. Li. 2012. “Carbon Storage and Sequestration by Urban Forests in Shenyang, China.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening no. 11 (2):121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.002.
  • Lo, A.Y.H., and C.Y. Jim. 2012. “Citizen Attitude and Expectation towards Greenspace Provision in Compact Urban Milieu.” Land Use Policy no. 29 (3):577–586. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.011.
  • Luttik, J. 2000. “The Value of Trees, Water and Open Space as Reflected by House Prices in the Netherlands.” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 48 (3–4):161–167. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00039-6.
  • Madureira, H., and T. Andresen. 2014. “Planning for Multifunctional Urban Green Infrastructures: Promises and Challenges.” Urban Design International no. 19 (1):38–49. doi: 10.1057/udi.2013.11.
  • Madureira, H., F. Nunes, J.V. Oliveira, L. Cormier, and T. Madureira. 2015. “Urban Residents’ Beliefs Concerning Green Space Benefits in Four Cities in France and Portugal.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening no. 14 (1):56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.008.
  • Newell, J.P., M. Seymour, T. Yee, J. Renteria, T. Longcore, J.R. Wolch, and A. Shishkovsky. 2013. “Green Alley Programs: Planning for a sustainable urban infrastructure?” Cities no. 31:144–155. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.07.004.
  • Noor, N.M., M.Z. Asmawi, and A. Abdullah. 2015. “Sustainable Urban Regeneration: GIS and Hedonic Pricing Method in determining the value of green space in housing area.” Asian Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies (Ace-Bs 2014 Seoul) no. 170:669–679. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.069.
  • Pandit, R., M. Polyakov, S. Tapsuwan, and T. Moran. 2013. “The Effect of Street Trees on Property Value in Perth, Western Australia.” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 110:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.001.
  • Parysek, J.J., and L. Mierzejewska. 2006. “Poznan.” Cities no. 23 (4):291–305. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2006.04.001.
  • Roe, M., and I. Mell. 2013. “Negotiating Value and Priorities: Evaluating the Demands of Green Infrastructure Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management no. 56 (5):650–673. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.693454.
  • Sander, H., S. Polasky, and R.G. Haight. 2010. “The Value of Urban Tree Cover: a Hedonic Property Price Model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA.” Ecological Economics no. 69 (8):1646–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.011.
  • Schwarz, N., A. Bauer, and D. Haase. 2011. “Assessing Climate Impacts of Planning Policies — an Estimation for the Urban Region of Leipzig (Germany).” Environmental Impact Assessment Review no. 31 (2):97–111. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.02.002.
  • Seeland, K. 2011. “Postscript: Landscapes and Health as Representations of Cultural Diversity.” In Forests, Trees, and Human Health, edited by K. Nilsson, M. Sangster, C. Gallis, T. Hartig, S. de Vries, K. Seeland and J. Schipperijn, 403–409. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Tajima, K. 2003. “New Estimates of the Demand for Urban Green Space: Implications for Valuing the Environmental Benefits of Boston’s Big Dig Project.” Journal of Urban Affairs no. 25 (5):641–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9906.2003.00006.x.
  • Talen, E. ed. 2013. Charter of the New Urbanism. Congress for the New Urbanism. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
  • Tyrvainen, L., K. Makinen, and J. Schipperijn. 2007. “Tools for Mapping Social Values of Urban Woodlands and Other Green Areas.” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 79 (1):5–19. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003.
  • Tzoulas, K., K. Korpela, S. Venn, V. Yli-Pelkonen, A. Kazmierczak, J. Niemela, and P. James. 2007. “Promoting Ecosystem and Human Health in Urban Areas using Green Infrastructure: a Literature Review.” Landscape and Urban Planning no. 81 (3):167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.
  • Urbański, P., M. Krzyżaniak, and A. Rydzewska. 2009. “Zieleń Poznania i innych miast w Polsce.” Nauka Przyroda Technologie no. 3 (1):1–10.
  • Vesely, E.T. 2007. “Green for Green: the Perceived Value of a Quantitative Change in the Urban Tree Estate of New Zealand.” Ecological Economics no. 63 (2–3):605–615. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.019.
  • Wright, H. 2011. “Understanding Green Infrastructure: the Development of a Contested Concept in England.” Local Environment no. 16 (10):1003–1019. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.631993.
  • Zhang, B., G. Xie, B. Xia, and C. Zhang. 2012. “The Effects of Public Green Spaces on Residential Property Value in Beijing.” Journal of Resources and Ecology no. 3 (3):243–252. doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.03.007.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-9c278c53-7507-4fd7-8a2d-3d5aaf8e2f57
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.