All’incrocio tra semantica e pragmatica (parte 1): le espressioni deittiche da Peirce a Reichenbach

• Authors: Izabela Anna Szantyka
• Languages of publication: IT

Abstracts

EN

The objective of this work divided in two parts is to review, in the most objective way and in accordance to the chronological order, different approches to the problematical question of the deicitc expressions, theories sometimes divergent, other times convergent between themselves and in relation to the approach inspired by the results of Bar-Hillel’s, Kaplan’s, Perry’s and Kleiber’s theoretical research, and announced in expressis verbis in the first part of this contribution’s title. The tentative to treat the deictic expressions as units which belong at the same time to the semantics’ and the pragmatics’ domain can be discreetly observed already in the Bühler’s (indexicals as signals and symbols) and Burks’ (deictics as indexical symbols) philosophical and semiotic thought, but also in the reductionist token-reflexivity theory of Reichenbach (division type / token). The results of Peirce’s and Russell’s research are also relevant, because, being diametrically opposed respect to the approaches mentioned above, they inspired, according to the principle of contradiction, the philosophical and linguistic theories, to which methodologies we explicitly refer.

Keywords

EN

Peirce; Reichenbach

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature
• Year: 2009
• Issue: 33
• Pages: 140-156

Contributors

author

Izabela Anna Szantyka

• Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland

References

• Bar-Hillel, Y. (1954): “Indexical expressions”, trad. it.: “Espressioni indicali”. [in:] Raynaud (ed.) (2006): 191-206.
• Benveniste, É. (1956): “La nature des pronoms”; trad. it.: “La natura dei pronomi”. [in:] Raynaud (ed.) (2006): 208-212.
• Benveniste, É. (1966): Problèmes de Linguistique Générale, t. I. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
• Bianchi, C. (2008): Pragmatica del Linguaggio. Roma/Bari: Editori Laterza.
• Bonomi, A. (ed.) (1995): La Struttura Logica del Linguaggio. Milano: Bompiani.
• Bühler, K. (1934): Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: G. Fischer; trad. it. (1983): Teoria del Linguaggio: La Funzione Rappresentativa del Linguaggio. Roma: A. Armando.
• Burks, A. W. (1948-1949): “Icon, index and symbol”. [in:] Philosophy and Phenomeno-Logical Research IX: 673-689.
• Burks, A. W. (ed.) (1931-1958): The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press/The Belknap Press.
• Cifuentes Honrubia, J. L. (1989): Lengua y Espacio. Introducciòn al Problema de la Deíxis en Español. Alicante: Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alicante.
• Edwards, T. (ed.) (1968): Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 4. New York: Collier Macmillan.
• Fumagalli, A. (2006): “Il problema dell’indicalità in semiotica”. [in:] Raynaud (ed.) (2006): 53-82.
• Gale, R. M. (1968): “Indexical signs, egocentric partculars and token-reflexive words”. [in:] Edwards (ed.) (1968): 151-155.
• Hartshorne, Ch. / Weiss P. (eds.) (1931-1935): Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1-6. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press / The Belknap Press.
• Jakobson, R. (1950-1957): “Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb”; trad. it.: “Commutatori, categorie verbali e il verbo russo”. [in:] Raynaud (ed.) (2006): 184-189.
• Kaplan, D. (1977): “Demonstratives. An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals”, trad. it.: “I dimostrativi. Saggio sulla semantica, logica, metafisica ed epistemologia dei dimostrativi e di altri indicali”. [in:] Raynaud (ed.) (2006): 214-278.
• Keidan, A. (2008): “Deissi, arbitrarietà e disambiguazione. Due approcci a confronto”. [in:] Keidan / Alfieri (eds.) (2008): 19-65.
• Keidan, A. / Alfieri L. (eds.) (2008): Deissi, Riferimento, Metafora. Questioni Classiche di Linguistica e Filosofia del Linguaggio. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1999): L’énonciation. De la Subjectivité dans le Langage. Paris: Armand Colin.
• Kleiber, G. (1986) : “Déictiques, embrayeurs etc., comment les définir? ”. [in:] L’information Grammaticale, n. 30: 3-22.
• Levinson, S. C. (1983): Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lyons, J. (1980): Sémantique Linguistique. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
• Peirce, Ch. S. (1884-1885): “On the algebra of logic. A contribution on the philosophy of notation”, ristampato in Burks (ed.) (1931-1958), vol. 3, 210-249, trad. it.: “Sull’algebra della logica: un contributo alla filosofia della notazione”. [in:] Raynaud (ed.) (2006): 102-127.
• Peirce, Ch. S. (1885): trad. it.: “Un Platone americano: recensione di L’aspetto religioso della filosofia di Royce”. [in:] Raynaud (ed.) (2006): 128-131.
• Raynaud, S. (ed.) (2006): Tu, io, qui, ora. Quale Semantica per gli Indicali? Milano: Guerini Studio.
• Reichenbach. H. (1947): Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.
• Strawson, P. F. (1950): “On referring”, trad. it.: “Sul riferimento”. [in:] Bonomi (ed.) (1995): 197-224.