Harmonising Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Central and Eastern Europe: The Effectiveness of Legal Transplants Through Consumer Collective Actions

• Authors: Cseres Katalin J.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the manner of harmonizing private enforcement in the EU. The paper examines the legal rules and, more importantly, the actual enforcement practice of collective consumer actions in EU Member States situated in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Collective actions are the key method of getting compensation for consumers who have suffered harm as a result of an anti-competitive practice. Consumer compensation has always been the core justification for the European Commission’s policy of encouraging private enforcement of competition law. In those cases where collective redress is not available to consumers, or consumers cannot apply existing rules or are unwilling to do so, then both their right to an effective remedy and the public policy goal of private enforcement remain futile. Analyzing collective compensatory actions in CEE countries (CEECs) places the harmonization process in a broader governance framework, created during their EU accession, characterized by top-down law-making and strong EU conditionality. Analyzing collective consumer actions through this ‘Europeanization’ process, and the phenomenon of vertical legal transplants, raises major questions about the effectiveness of legal transplants vis-à-vis homegrown domestic law-making processes. It also poses the question how such legal rules may depend and interact with market, constitutional and institutional reforms.

Keywords

EN

private enforcement of competition law; collective actions; consumer; EU law; Europeanization

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 8(12)
• Pages: 33-60

Dates

issued

2015-12-31

Contributors

author

Cseres Katalin J.

• Associate Professor of Law, Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance, Amsterdam Center or Law & Economics, University of Amsterdam

References

• Bache I., Jordan A., ‘Europeanization and Domestic Change’, [in:] I. Bache, A. Jordan (eds.), The Europeanization of British Politics, Basingstoke.
• Becker G., Stigler G., ‘Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers’ (1974) 3 Journal of Legal Studies.
• Cafaggi F., Cherednychenko O., Cremona M., Cseres K.J., Gorywoda L., Karova R., Micklitz H.W., Podstawa K., ‘Europeanization of Private Law in Central and Eastern Europe Countries (CEECs). Preliminary Findings and Research Agenda’ (2010) 15
• European University Institute Working Papers LAW.
• Cseres K.J., ‘Accession to the EU’s competition law regime: a law and governance approach’ (2014) 7(9) YARS.
• Cseres K.J., ‘Collective consumer actions: a competition law perspective’ [in:] W.H. Van Boom, M. Loos (eds.), Collective Consumer Interests and How They are Served Best in Europe; Legal aspects and policy issues on the border between private law and public policy, Groningen 2007.
• Cseres K.J., Consumer protection and competition law, The Hague 2005.
• Cseres K.J., ‘The impact of Regulation 1/2003 in the New Member States’ (2010) 6(2)
• Competition Law Review.
• Cseres K.J., ‘Towards a European Model of Economic Justice: the Role of Competition Law’ [in:] H-W. Micklitz (ed.), The Many Concepts of Social Justice in European Private Law, Cheltenham 2011.
• Cseres K.J., Mendes J., ‘Consumers’ access to EU competition law procedures: outer and inner limits’ (2014) 51(2) Common Market Law Review.
• Gerber D.J., ‘Private Enforcement of Competition Law: A Comparative Perspective’ [in:] A. Möllers, A. Heinemann (eds.), The Enforcement of Competition Law in Europe, Cambridge 2007.
• Hensler D., ‘The Globalization of Class Actions: An Overview’ (2009) 622(1) The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
• Hodges Ch., The Reform of Class and Representative Actions in European Legal Systems, Oxford-Portland 2008.
• Ioannidou M., ‘Enhancing Consumers’ Role in EU Private Competition Law Enforcement: a Normative and Practical Approach’ (2012) 8 Competition Law Review.
• Jurkowska-Gomułka A., ‘Private Enforcement of Competition Law in Polish Courts: The Story of an (Almost) Lost Hope for Development’ (2013) 6(8) YARS.
• Juska Z., ‘Obstacles in European competition law enforcement: a potential solution for collective redress’(2014) 7(1) European Journal of Legal Studies.
• Kviatek B., Explaining legal transplants. Transplantation of EU law into Central Eastern Europe, Oisterwijk 2015.
• Leskinen Ch., ‘Collective Actions: Rethinking Funding and National Cost Rules’ (2011) 8(1) Competition Law Review.
• McAfee P., Mialon H., Mialon S., ‘Private v. Public Antitrust Enforcement: A Strategic Analysis’ (2008) 92 Journal of Public Economics.
• Petrov P., ‘Bulgaria’ [in:] International Comparative Legal Guide, Enforcement of competition laws, London 2009.
• Peyer S., ‘Private Antitrust Litigation in Germany from 2005 to 2007: Empirical Evidence’ (2012) 8(2) Journal of Competition Law and Economics.
• Piszcz A., ‘“Class actions” in the Court culture of Eastern Europe’ [in:] L. Ervo, A. Nylund (ed.), The Future of Civil Litigation – Access to Courts and Court Connected mediation in the Nordic Countries, Cham 2014.
• Polinsky M., ‘Private Versus Public Enforcement of Fines’ (1980) 9 Journal of Legal Studies. Pridham G., ‘The EU’s Political Conditionality and Post-Accession Tendencies:
• Comparisons from Slovakia and Latvia’ (2008) 46 Journal of Common Market Studies.
• Rodger B., ‘Private enforcement and collective redress: the benefits of empirical research and comparative approaches’ (2012) 8(1) Competition Law Review.
• Schimmelfennig F., ‘EU External Governance and Europeanization Beyond the EU’, [in:] D. Levi-Faur (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford 2012.
• Schimmelfennig F., Sedelmeier U., ‘Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’ (2004) Journal of European Public Policy.
• Schwartz W., ‘An Overview of the Economics of Antitrust Enforcement’ (1980) 68
• Georgetown Law Journal.
• Sein K., ‘Private enforcement of competition law – the case of Estonia’ (2013) 6(8) YARS. Shavell S., ‘The Optimal Structure of Law Enforcement’ (1993) 36 Journal of Law and
• Economics.
• Shughart II W., ‘Private Antitrust Enforcement – Compensation, Deterrence, or Extortion’ (1988) 12 Regulation Magazine.
• Szilágyi P., ‘Private Enforcement of Competition Law and Stand-Alone Actions in Hungary’ (2013) 3(6) Global Competition Litigation Review.
• Townley C., ‘Is Anything more Important than Consumer Welfare (in Article 81 EC)?: Reflections of a Community lawyer’ (2007-2008) 10 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies.
• Trstenjak V., Weingerl P., ‘Collective Actions in the European Union – American or European Model?’ (2014) 5 Beijing Law Review.
• Van den Bergh R., ‘Private Enforcement of European Competition Law and the Persisting Collective Action Problem’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law.
• Van W.H. Boom, Loos M. (eds.), Collective Consumer Interests and How They are Served Best in Europe; Legal aspects and policy issues on the border between private law and public policy, Groningen 2007.
• Van den Bergh R., Visscher L., ‘The Preventive Function of Collective Actions for Damages in Consumer Law’ (2008) 1(2) Erasmus Law Review.
• Vanikiotis M.T., ‘Private Antitrust Enforcement and Tentative Steps Toward Collective Redress in Europe and the United Kingdom’ (2014) 37 Fordham International Law Journal.
• Wardhaugh B., ‘Bogeymen, lunatics and fanatics: collective actions and the private enforcement of European competition law’ (2014) 34(1) Legal Studies.
• Watson A., ‘From Legal Transplants to Legal Formants’ (1995) 43 American Journal of Comparative Law.
• Watson A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, Athens 1993.
• Wiener J.B., ‘Something Borrowed for Something Blue: Legal Transplants in the Evolution of Global Environmental Law’ (2001) 27 Ecology Law Quarterly.
• Wils W.P.J., ‘Should Private Enforcement Be Encouraged in Europe?’ (2003) 26 World Competition.
• Wils W.P.J., ‘The Relationship between Public Antitrust Enforcement and Private Actions for Damages’ (2009) 32(1) World Competition.

Identifiers

ISSN

1689-9024