Jak myśleć o praktyczności: Wojciecha W. Gasparskiego traktat o filozofii Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego oraz similaria

• Authors: Makowski Piotr T.

Title variants

EN

How to think about practicality: Wojciech W. Gasparski’s treatise on philosophy of Tadeusz Kotarbiński and similaria

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

Tekst jest przyczynkiem do dyskusji nad książką prof. Wojciecha Gasparskiego Filozofia praktyczności. Traktat o filozofii Tadeusza Kotarbińskiego oraz similaria (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, 2021). Autor artykułu najpierw omawia treść książki i samą ideę praktyczności w kontekście aspiracji filozoficznych prakseologii; następnie omawia dwa możliwe kierunki współczesnej interpretacji prakseologicznej idei praktyczności: popularną w dziedzinie zarządzania tzw. teorię praktyki oraz analityczną filozofię działania. Celem tej zwięzłej dyskusji jest ukazanie potencjału rozwojowego idei prakseologicznych Kotarbińskiego.

EN

The text is a brief contribution to the discussion on Prof. Wojciech Gasparski’s book Filozofia praktyczności (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, 2021). The author first presents the content of the book and the idea of practicality itself in the context of praxiology’s philosophical ambitions. In the second step, the author discusses two possible directions of contemporary interpretation of the praxiological idea of practicality: the so-called practice theory, popular in the field of management, and the analytical philosophy of action. The purpose of this concise discussion is to show the developmental potential of Kotarbiński’s praxiological ideas.

Keywords

PL

praktyczność; prakseologia; teoria praktyki; analityczna filozofia działania; Tadeusz Kotarbiński; Wojciech W. Gasparski

EN

practicality; praxiology; practice theory; analytic philosophy of action; Tadeusz Kotarbiński; Wojciech W. Gasparski

• Publisher: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk / Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Prakseologia
• Year: 2021-2022
• Issue: 163/164
• Pages: 163-178

Contributors

author

Makowski Piotr T.

• Uniwersytet Warszawski

References

• Brown J.S., Duguid P. 1991, Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation, „Organization Science”, 2, 1: 40–57.
• Carr D. 1981, Knowledge in Practice, „American Philosophical Quarterly”, 18, 1: 53–61.
• Collen A. 1998, Whether to design and plan a life. „Systems Research and Behavioral Science”, 15, 3: 183–192.
• Gasparski W.W. 2017, From a Study of Practice to a Philosophy of Practicality. Tadeusz Kotarbiński’s Contribution to the Lvov-Warsaw School of Philosophy, [w:] A. Brożek, F. Stadler, J. Woleński [red.], The Significance of the
• Lvov‑Warsaw School in the European Culture, Cham: Springer International Publishing: 135: 154.
• Hetherington S.C. 2006, How to know (that knowledge-that is knowledge-how), [w:] S.C. Hetherington [red.], Epistemology Futures, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 71–94.
• Knorr Cetina K., Schatzki T.R., von Savigny E. 2001, The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, New York: Routledge.
• Kotarbiński T. 1955, Traktat o dobrej robocie, Wrocław: Ossolineum.
• Kotarbiński T. 1957, Czy wydziały filozoficzne uniwersytetów mają być wydziałami nauczycielskimi?, [przedruk w:] tegoż, Wybór pism, t. II. Myśli o myśleniu, Warszawa: PWN.
• Kotarbiński T. 2003, Specjalizacja i integracja [w:] tegoż, Dzieła Wszystkie, t. II. Prakseologia, Warszawa–Wrocław: Ossolineum: 418–421.
• Makowski P.T. 2015, Praxiology meets Planning Theory of Intention. Kotarbiński and Bratman on Plans [w:] P. Makowski, M. Bonecki, K. Nowak-Posadzy [red.], Praxiology and the Reasons for Action (Praxiology: the International Annual of Practical Philosophy and Methodology, 23): New Brunswick (NJ): Transactions Publishers: 43–71.
• Makowski P.T. 2016, Intention inertia and the plasticity of planning. „Philosophical Psychology”, 29, 7: 1045–1056.
• Makowski P.T. 2017a, Kotarbiński’s praxiology and the analytic action theory, [w:] W.W. Gasparski [red.], Praxiological Essays: Texts and Contexts (Praxiology: the International Annual of Practical Philosophy and Methodology, 25), New York: Routledge: 101–113.
• Makowski P.T. 2017b, Tadeusz Kotarbiński’s Action Theory – Reinterpretive Studies, New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
• Nicolini D. 2013, Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. An Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Niiniluoto I. 2002, Kotarbiński as a Scientific Realist, „Erkenntnis”, 56, 1: 63–82.
• Noe A. 2005, Against intellectualism, „Analysis”, 65, 4: 278–290.
• Orlikowski W.J. 2000, Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations, „Organization Science”, 11, 4: 404–428.
• Paasivaara M., Lassenius C. 2014, Communities of practice in a large distributed agile software development organization – Case Ericsson. „Information and Software Technology”, 56, 12: 1556–1577.
• Pradeu T., Lemoine M., Khelfaoui M., Gingras Y. 2021, Philosophy in Science: Can philosophers of science permeate through science and produce scientific knowledge? „The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science”, (doi:10.1086/715518).
• Rabinowicz W. (2000), Kotarbinski’s Early Criticism of Utilitarianism, „Utilitas”, 12, 1: 79–84.
• Roland J. 1958, On „Knowing How” and „Knowing That”, „The Philosophical Review”, 67, 3: 379–388.
• Ryan L.V., Nahser F.B., Gasparski W.W. 2002, Praxiology and Pragmatism (Praxiology: the International Annual of Practical Philosophy and Methodology, 10), New Brunswick (NJ): Transaction Publishers.
• Ryle G. 1949, The Concept of Mind. Chicago: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Schatzki T. R. 2012. A Primer on Practices, [w:] J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, F. Trede (red.), Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers: 13–26.
• Schön D.A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Basic Books.
• Smith B. 2006. On the Phases of Reism, [w:] C. Arkadiusz, L. Dariusz (red.), Actions, Products, and Things: Brentano and Polish Philosophy, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag: 121–182
• Snowdon P. 2004, The Presidential Address: Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered, „Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society”, 104: 1–29.
• Stanley J. 2011, Know How. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
• Vaara E., Whittington R. 2012, Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously, „The Academy of Management Annals”, 6, 1: 285–336.
• Whittington R. 2006, Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research, „Organization Studies”, 27, 5: 613–634.
• Woleński J. 2001, Tadeusz Kotarbinski-Reism and Science, [w:] Polish Philosophers of Science and Nature in the 20th Century (Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 74), Amsterdam: Rodopi: 47–52.
• Woleński J. 2007, Naturalism and Reism, „Dialogue and Universalism”, 17, Issue 1–2: 13–19.
• Woleński J. 2022, „Reism” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), (ed.) E.N. Zalta: The Metaphysics Research Lab.: URL=<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/reism/>.
• Zaręba M. 2017, Kotarbiński’s Praxiology and Analytic Philosophy of Action [w:] A. Brożek, F. Stadler, J. Woleński [red.], The Significance of the Lvov–Warsaw School in the European Culture, Cham: Springer International Publishing: 155–171.

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7206/prak.0079-4872_2015_160_47