Zakaz pracy w niedzielę jako problem granic ekonomii

• Authors: Paweł Drobny

Title variants

EN

The prohibition of work on sunday as the problem of boundaries of economics

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The article is metha-theoretical consideration of the economics interference in the field of culture, and particularly focuses on religion and the interference consequences. The problem of the boundaries of economics is presented in the context of a dispute about Sunday The thesis which the author tries to justify are as follows. Economics became a science that has no boundaries. The model based on which decision-making is done by homo economicus is no more an area for creative problem discussion and resolution but be¬came schematic, an analytical structure, based on which economics manages the annexation of those areas of human life which so far has not been the subject of her interest. One such area is the celebration of Sunday. In this example, the author tries to: first, demonstrate that the ossified analytical structure changes the meaning of the stu-died phenomenon, and as such conclusions drawn from it are a false basis for economic policy, secondly, he indicates the causes of this ossification of the analytical structure and thirdly, propose a different approach to the studied phenomenon, called personalist economics.

Keywords

PL

Dzień wolny od pracy; Ekonomia; Handel

EN

Day off; Economy; Trade

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach
• Journal: Studia Ekonomiczne
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 210
• Pages: 108-117

Contributors

author

Paweł Drobny

References

• Burgos J.M., Personalizm, Centrum Myśli Jana Pawła II, Warszawa 2010.
• Coase R.H., Firma, rynek i prawo, Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business, Warszawa 2013.
• Danner P.L., O’Boyle E.J., Personalist Economics is Human Economics Because it Puts the Human Person at the Center of Economic Affairs, Forum for Social Economics, Vol. 29, Iss. 1.
• Davis J.B., Individuals and Identity in Economics, Cambridge University Press, 2011. Eliade M., Sacrum i profanum, Wydawnictwo KR, Warszawa 1999.
• Fine B., Milonakis D., From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics, Routledge, Lon-don and New York, 2010.
• Jaroszyński P., Człowiek i nauka, Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu, Lublin 2008.
• Kamiński S., Nauka i metoda. Pojęcie nauki i klasyfikacja nauk, TN KUL, Lublin 1993.
• Krąpiec M.A., Koncepcje nauki i filozofia, [w:] Wprowadzenie do filozofii, Wydawnic-two KUL, Lublin 2008.
• Krąpiec M.A., Osoba ludzka i błędy w jej rozumieniu, [w:] Błąd antropologiczny, red. A. Maryniarczyk, K. Stępień, Polskie Towarzystwo Tomasza z Akwinu, Lublin 2003.
• Lawson T., Reorienting Economics, Routledge, New York 2006.
• Posner R.A., The Law and Economics Movement, „The American Economic Review” 1987, Vol. 77, No. 2.
• Quine W.V.O., Z punktu widzenia logiki: dziewięć esejów logiczno-filozoficznych, Fun-dacja Aletheia, Warszawa 2000.
• Ratzinger J., Duch liturgii, Klub Książki Katolickiej, Poznań 2002.
• Sandel M., Czego nie można kupić za pieniądze, Kurhaus Publishing, Warszawa 2012.
• Spaemann R., Zamach na niedzielę, [w:] R. Spaemann, Granice, Oficyna Naukowa, Warszawa 2006.
• Żurkowska G., Nietransparentność świata jako problem metafizyczny, [w:] Nauka a metafizyka, red. A. Motycka, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, Warszawa 2009.

Identifiers

ISSN

2083-8611