Podstawy językoznawstwa kognitywnego w świetle myśli Kanta, Wittgensteina i Whorfa

• Authors: Kacprzak Aleksander

Title variants

EN

The Fundaments of Cognitive Linguistics in the Light of Kant, Wittgenstein, and Whorf

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

In the recent thirty years, much of the research carried out in the field of linguistics has been based on the experientialist philosophy formulated by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, treating language as a key to uncover the cognitively unconscious in human thought and operating with notions such as conceptualization, conceptual metaphor, or image schema. Nevertheless, despite the great success of the cognitive linguistics enterprise, the basic philosophical assumptions that lie at the foundation of the paradigm may still raise controversies and trigger lively discussions. The present article aims to shed more light at some of the essential issues pertaining to the modern-day cognitive approach by tracing its roots to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Benjamin Lee Whorf. To start with, the article discusses the place that the philosophy of experiential realism takes in the basic division between realism and anti-realism, and attempts to demonstrate that the quest to uphold the basic realistic stance while still giving a chief role to human conceptualization is in many ways an elaboration of Kant’s “Copernican revolution”. Even more traces are found in the late works of Ludwig Wittgenstein, who with his “Philosophical Investigations” laid foundations for the current cognitive theory of categorization, not only helping realize the blurry character of category borders but also questioning the hitherto dominating atomistic approach to meaning. Perhaps the most noteworthy inspirations, however, can be found in the writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf who, like the modern-day cognitive linguists, was deeply interested in the variety of the different models that humans impose on the real world, and who may have prefigured much of the currently popular theory of conceptual metaphor. Overall, a deeper insight into the philosophy of the three discussed thinkers allows us to better understand the roots of the modern-day cognitive linguistics and erase some of the controversies that have arisen around it over the years.

Keywords

EN

Cognitive Linguistics; Kant; Wittgenstein; Whorf; Philosophy of language

• Publisher: Oficyna Wydawnicza ATUT – Wrocławskie Wydawnictwo Oświatowe
• Journal: Linguistische Treffen in Wrocław
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 19
• Pages: 375-385

Dates

published

2021-06-17

Contributors

author

Kacprzak Aleksander

• Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań

References

• Cienki, Alan. „Frames, idealized cognitive models, domains”. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Red. Dirk Geeraerts i Hubert Cuyckens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, 170–187. Print.
• Geeraerts, Dirk i Hubert Cuykens. „Introducing Cognitive Liguistics”. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Red. Dirk Geeraerts i Hubert Cuyckens. Oxford: Oxford University press, 2007, 3–23. Print.
• Katunar, Daniela i Igor Eterović. „Kant’s Notion of Schema and its Basis in Linguistic Analysis”. Synthesis philosophica 32 (2) (2017): 311–334. https://doi.org/10.21464/sp32204. 10.11.2020.
• Lakoff, George. „The Invariance Hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas?” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1990): 39–74. Print.
• Lakoff, George. Kobiety, ogień i rzeczy niebezpieczne. Kraków: Universitas, 2011. Print. http:// www.uwm.edu.pl/anglistyka/uploads/files/drogosz/lakoff-the-invariance-hypothesis-is-abstract-reason-based-on-image-schemas.pdf. 10.11.2020.
• Lakoff, George i Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980. Print.
• Lakoff, George i Mark Johnson. Philosophy In The Flesh. New York: Basic Books, 1999. Print.
• Muszyński, Zbigniew. „Światy za słowami. Ich natura i porządek”. Językowa kategoryzacja świata. Red. Renata Grzegorczykowa i Anna Pajdzińska. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, 1996, 27–46. Print.
• Ogden, Charles Kay i Ivor Armstrong Richards. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: A Harvest Book. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, 1946. Print.
• Putnam, Hilary. Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. https://www.academia.edu/36411076/REASON_TRUTH_AND_HISTORY_Putnam_Hilary. 10.11.2020.
• Putnam, Hilary. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press, 1990. Print.
• Taylor, John R. Kategoryzacja w języku. Kraków: Universitas, 2001. Print.
• Tokarski, Ryszard. Światy za słowami. Wykłady z semantyki leksykalnej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, 2014. Print.
• Vervaeke John i Christopher D. Green. „Women, Fire, and Dangerous Theories: A Critique of Lakoff’s Theory of Categorization”. Metaphor and Symbol 12 (1997): 59–80, http://www. yorku.ca/christo/papers/wfdt8.htm. 10.11.2020.
• Whorf, Benjamin Lee. Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T Press, 1956. Print.
• Wierzbicka, Anna. „Metaphors Linguists Live By“. Papers in Linguistics 19 (1986): 287–313.
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2011. Print.

Identifiers

DOI

10.23817/lingtreff.19-22