From independence to the Euro introduction: varieties of capitalism in the Baltic States

• Authors: Wrobel Ralph M.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, are very successful in transformation. From 1991 to 2015 they regained independence and transformed their economies from socialist central planning into functioning market economies, joined the EU in 2004 and became member of the Euro zone. Estonia introduced the Euro al-ready in 2011 while Latvia followed in 2014 and Lithuania in 2015. Thereof follow two questions. First, why all three Baltic countries are so successful? And secondly, do we really find everywhere the pattern of the “Shining star” Estonia, followed by Latvia and at least Lithuania? According to modern Varieties of Capitalism theory all three economies can be classified as Central and Eastern European Countries in the style of Liberal Market Economies (CEEC-LME). As can be shown, there are also differences in the institutional setups of all three Baltic States. During the period of transformation a pattern of Estonia followed by Latvia and at least Lithuania evolved which is also reflected by the sequence of joining Euro area. But institutional patterns are not determined in the long run. Since the crisis of 2008/09 the pattern within the Baltics changed. While Estonia remains on the first rank Lithuania overtook Latvia in terms of growth and wealth. Deregulation in Lithuania – which may be observed by the development of the Economic Freedom Index of the Heritage Foundation within the last ten years – may be the main reason. But also, the low sophistication of the Lithuanian banking system as well as Latvia’s massive suffering from the crisis may explain the last change of the pattern in the Baltics. There are several possibilities to illustrate the different paths of development of the Baltic States. While Geography Hypothesis is not able to explain the differences, the extractive political institutions in Estonia and Latvia can illustrate the lead of both countries in contrast to Lithuania till the crisis in 2008/09. Additionally, different basic values in all three Baltic States are responsible for the different

Keywords

EN

VoC, Baltics; Estonia, Latvia; Lithuania; Euro introduction

• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Bankowa we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics (CEEJME)
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 9-38

Dates

online

2015-03-01

Contributors

author

Wrobel Ralph M.

• West Saxon University of Applied Sciences

References

• Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2012), Why nations fail – the origins of power, prosperity and poverty, London.
• Ahlborn, M.; Ahrens, J.; Schweickert, R. (2014) Largescale transition of economic systems: Do CEECs converge towards western prototypes?, PFH Forschungspapiere/Research Papers, PFH Private Hochschule Göttingen, no. 2014/05.
• Aidukaite J. (2013), Social policy changes in the three Baltic States over the last decade, “Ekonomika”, vol. 92 no. 3, pp. 89 – 104.
• Albert M. (1993), Capitalism against capitalism: how America’s obsession with individual achievement and shortterm profit has led it to the brink of collapse, New York.
• Amable B. (2003), The diversity of modern capitalism, Oxford.
• Bohle D. (2009), East European capitalism – what went wrong?, ”Intervention – European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies”, vol. 6 no. 1, 2009, pp. 32 – 43.
• Bohle D., Greskovits, B. (2007), Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe, ”West European Politics”, vol. 25 no. 3, pp. 443 – 466.
• Bohle D., Greskovits, B. (2012) Capitalist diversity at Europe’s periphery, Ithaka 2012.
• Buchen C. (2010), Emerging economic systems in Central and Eastern Europe – a qualitative and quantitative assessment, Wiesbaden 2010.
• Darvas Z. (2009) The Baltic challenge and Euro-area entry, “Bruegel Policy Contribution”, no. 13. Deutsch-Baltische Außenhandelskammer (2015), Länderinfos Estland, Lettland, Litauen, http://www.ahkbalt.org/laenderinfos/ [10.01.2015].
• Dudzińska K. (2013), The Baltic States’ success story in combating the economic crisis: consequences for regional cooperation within the EU and with Russia, “Policy Paper”, The Polish Institute of International Affairs, no. 6 vol. 54.
• EBRD (2014), Transition Report 2013: stuck in transition?, London.
• ECB [European Central Bank] (2010), Convergence Report May 2010.
• ECB [European Central Bank] (2013), Convergence Report June 2013.
• ECB [European Central Bank] (2014), Convergence Report June 2014.
• Heritage Foundation (2015), Economic freedom index, http://www.heritage.org [08.04.2015].
• Georgieva, E. (2012) The economies of the BELL countries (Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) after their EU accession, “Review of European Studies”, vol. 4 no. 2, pp. 191 – 202.
• Kuokštis, V. (2012), Baltic Variety of Capitalism as an explanation of the success of internal devaluation, in: Governance failure and reform attempts after the global economic crisis of 2008/09: Case studies from Central and Eastern Europe, eds. Kosals L. et al. (eds.), Stuttgart, pp. 13 – 28.
• Lepp, A., Pantti, M. (2012), Window to the West: Memories of watching Finnish television in Estonia during the Soviet period, “Journal of European Television History & Culture”, vol. 2 no. 2, pp. 76 – 86.
• Maslauskaite, K., Zorgenfreija, L. (2013), Economic miracle in the Baltic States: an exemplary way to Growth?, in: The Baltic States in the EU: yesterday, today and tomorrow, eds. Grigas A., Kasekamp A., Maslauskaite K., Zorgenfreija L., Studies & Reports no. 98, Jacques Delors Institute, pp. 33 - 64.
• Matthes, C. (2013), Lettland, in: Vom Ostblock zur EU: Systemtransformation 1990 – 2012 im Vergleich, eds. Heydemann G., Vodička K., Göttingen, pp. 47 – 76.
• Nölke, A., Vliegenthart, A. (2009), Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: the emerge of dependent market economies in East Central Europe, “World Politics”, vol. 61 no. 4, pp. 670 – 702.
• Norkus, Z. (2012) On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania: a qualitative comparative analysis of patterns in postcommunist transformation, Vilnius 2012.
• Panther, S. (1997), Cultural factors in the transition process – Latin center, Orthodox periphery?, in: Issues in transformation theory, eds. Backhaus, J., Krause G., Marburg, pp. 95 – 122.
• Schrader, K., Laaser, C. (2014), Lettland: Fit für den Euro?, Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge No. 532/533.
• Szanyi, M. (2013), Large-scale transformation of social-economic institutions – comparative case studies on CEECs, Background Paper 3 – Varieties of Capitalism and CEECs, WelfareWealthWork, Working Paper No. 19, www.foreurope.eu [10.12.2014]/
• Winkelmann, R. (2013), Litauen, in: Vom Ostblock zur EU: Systemtransformation 1990 – 2012 im Vergleich, eds. Heydemann G., Vodička K., Göttingen, pp. 77 – 100.
• Wolff, G. (2012), Challenges for the Euro area and implications for Latvia, “Bruegel Policy Contribution” 2012/05, March 2012.
• World Economic Forum (2014), The Global Competitiveness Report 2014 – 2015.
• Wrobel, R. (2002), Kulturelle Faktoren im Transformationsprozess: die Entwicklung interner und externer Institutionen in den drei Baltischen Staaten, in: Euroopa Liiduga Liitumise Mõju Eesti Majanduspoliitikale, Tartu, pp. 243 – 251.
• Wrobel, R. (2011), Die Euro-Einführung in Estland: Ein Anachronismus?, “Orientierungen zur Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik”, no. 128 vol. 2, pp. 39 – 43.
• Wrobel, R. (2013), Estland, in: Vom Ostblock zur EU: Systemtransformation 1990 – 2012 im Vergleich, eds. Heydemann G., Vodička K., Göttingen, pp. 17 – 45.

Identifiers

ISSN

2353 - 9119