USE OF E-GOVERNMENT IN POLAND IN COMPARISON TO OTHER EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES

• Authors: Śledziewska Katarzyna , Levai Adam , Zięba Damian
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Adopting new technologies into the practice of national government can significantly improve the quality of public services and the government’s general performance. In this paper we present the results of our research on Poland’s performance of e-government in comparison to EU15 and NMS12. The analysis is based on data provided by Eurostat’s Information Society’s comprehensive database. We find that Poland, on average, is lagging behind other European countries from both SMEs perspective and especially from citizens perspective in implementing effective technologies in public sector. In this paper we deliver some recommendations for the polish government.

Keywords

EN

E-government; E-governance; Public Authorities; Citizens; SMEs

• Publisher: Katedra Informatyki Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Information Systems in Management
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 119-130

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Śledziewska Katarzyna

• Digital Economy Lab, University of Warsaw (UW)

author

Levai Adam

• Digital Economy Lab, University of Warsaw (UW)

author

Zięba Damian

• Digital Economy Lab, University of Warsaw (UW)

References

• European Commision (2012), eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020 - Innovative healthcare for the 21st century. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/docs/com_2012_736_en.pdf, (02.11.2015).
• European Commission (2012), The 2012 Ageing Report. Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010-2060). Economic and Financial affairs. ISBN 978-92-79-22850-6. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2012/pdf/ee-2012-2_en.pdf, (22.10.2015).
• Ministerstwo Administracji i Cyfryzacji (2014), E-administracja w oczach internautów 2014. Retrieved from https://mac.gov.pl/files/raport_e-administracja_w_oczach_internautow_2014_z.pdf, (11.10.2015).
• OECD (2013), Poland: Implementing Strategic-State Capability. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201811-en, (02.11.2015).
• OECD (2014), Recommendations of the council on digital government strategies. Public governance and territorial directorate. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/public-innovation/Recommendation-digital-government-strategies.pdf, (01.11.2015).
• OECD (2015), Government at a Glance 2015. OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2015-en, (01.10.2015).
• OECD (2015), OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015. OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264232440-en, (01.11.2015).
• OECD (2015), Open Government Data Review of Poland: Unlocking the Value of Government Data. OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264241787-en, (02.11.2015).
• Palvia S. and Sharma S. S. (2007), E-Government and E-Governance: Definitions/Domain Framework and Status around the World. Foundation of e-government. Retrieved from http://csi-sigegov.orgwww.csi-sigegov.org/1/1_369.pdf, (05.11.2015).
• Singh A. and Sharma V. (2009), e-Governance and e-Government: a study of some initiatives. International journal of eBusiness and eGovernment studies, Vol 1, No1.
• Szymczak M. (2010), Intstrumenty elektroniczne w procesie udzielania zamówień publicznych. PARP.
• United Nations (2014), E-Government Survey. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/portals/egovkb/documents/un/2014-survey/e-gov_complete_survey-2014.pdf, (02.11.2015).

Identifiers

ISSN

2084-5537