Zagadnienia strony podmiotowej w Statucie Międzynarodowego Trybunału Karnego w świetle poglądów przedstawicieli doktryny prawa i praktyki

• Authors: Dominika Dróżdż

Title variants

EN

The issues of the subject party in the Statute of the International Criminal Court in light of the views of the representatives of legal doctrine and practice

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

In conclusion, the desire to commit an act would not change the ascertainment that the act should be committed with direct intent will, however, impact the intent and the burden of the act by satisfying additional subjective elements. Only art. 30 of the ICC Statute is an exception presenting the definition of “mental element”, though it is perceived differently by the doctrine representatives from different countries. The concept by O. Triffterer has not won worldwide recognition among the supporters of the theory that there should be applied the provision stipulating otherwise than art. 30 of the ICC Statute and those who do not recognise the difference between “Tatbestand” and “mens rea”. It seems that the Triffterer’s concept has not been approved as, allegedly, the principles of criminal responsibility should be distinguished from the crime definitions within the ICC jurisdiction. Taking into account the ICC experience, a conclusion may be drawn that art. 30 is applied when there are no other specific provisions relating to mental element in the regulations of the ICC Statute, the Elements of Crime or customary law.

Keywords

PL

zamiar bezpośredni; zamiar ewentualny; zamiar specjalny; zamiar szczególny; ustawowa określoność czynu; zespół znamion czynu zabronionego; actus reus

EN

dolus directus; dolus eventualis; special intent; specific intent; Tatbestand

• Publisher: Łódzkie Towarzystwo Naukowe, Stowarzyszenie
• Journal: Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne
• Year: 2014
• Volume: XCIII (93)
• Pages: 57-68

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Dominika Dróżdż

• Katedra Nauk Prawych, Społeczna Akademia Nauk

References

• Ambos K., Internationales Strafrecht. Strafanwendungsrecht, Völkerrecht, Europäisches Strafrecht, C.H.Beck, München 2008.
• Bantekas I., Nash S., International Criminal Law, Routledge-Cavendish, London – New York 2007.
• Bohlander M., Principles of German criminal code, Oxford Hart Publishing, Oxford – Portland – Oregon 2009.
• Byron C., War crimes and crimes against humanity in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Manchester University Press, Manchester – New York 2009.
• Cassese A., International Criminal Law, 2. Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
• A. Cassese, P. Gaeta, L. Baig, M. Fan, C. Gosnell, A. Whiting (red.), International Criminal Law, 3. Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013.
• Darnagard C., Individual criminal Responsibility for Core International Crimes, Springer, 2008.
• Dróżdż D., W sprawie art. 30 Statutu MTK, [w:] A. Koperek (red.), Polityka międzynarodowa a globalizacja – wybrane aspekty, Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie 2012/XIII/3, s. 117–138.
• Indecki K., Liszewska A., Prawo karne materialne. Nauka o przestępstwie, karze, środkach penalnych, Dom Wyd. ABC, Warszawa 2002.
• Krajnik S., Przesłanki odpowiedzialności w prawie karnym, TNOiK, Toruń 2010.
• Królikowski M., Wiliński P., Izydorczyk J., Podstawy prawa karnego międzynarodowego, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa 2008.
• Piragoff D.K., Robinson D., Article 30. Mental element, [w:] O. Triffterer (red.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, C.H. Beck – Hart-Namos, Baden-Baden 2008, s. 527–535.
• Płachta M., Międzynarodowy Trybunał Karny, t. II, Zakamycze, Kraków 2004.
• Quigley J.B., The Genocide Convention: An International Law Analysis, Aldershot, UK – Burlington, VT 2006.
• Schabas W.A., The Jelisić Case and the Mens Rea of the Crime of Genocide, Leiden Journal of International Law 2001/14, s. 125–139.
• Triffterer O., Command responsibility, Article 28 Rome Statute, [w:] idem (red.), Gedächtnisschrift für Theo Vogler, C.F.Mϋller Verlag, Heidelberg 2004, s. 213–262.
• Triffterer O., Genocide, Its Particular Intent to Destroy in Whole or in Part the Group as Such, Leiden Journal of International Law 2001/14/2, s. 399–408.
• Werle G., Jessberger F., Burchards W., Nerlich V., Cooper B., Principles of International Criminal Law, T.M.C. Press, Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York 2005.