Arcola Research LLP, 6 Alvington Crescent, London E8 2NW, United Kingdom;
References
Beach, D., & Rohlfing, I. (2015). Integrating Cross-case Analyses and Process Tracing in Set-Theoretic Research: Strategies and Parameters of Debate. Sociological Methods & Research, 49124115613780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115613780
Befani, B. (2012). Models of Causality and Causal Inference. In E. Stern, N. Stame, J. Mayne, K. Forss, R. Davies, & B. Befani, Broadening the Range of Methods for Impact Evaluations. Retrieved from www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/Output/189575/Default.aspx
Befani, B. (2013). Between complexity and generalization: Addressing evaluation challenges with QCA. Evaluation, 19(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022213493839
Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences (1 edition). New York: Routledge.
Joffe, M. (2017a). Causal theories, models and evidence in economics—some reflections from the natural sciences. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), 1280983. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1280983
Joffe, M. (2017b). Evidence and the micro-foundations of economic growth. Economics and Business Review.
Lewin, K. (1951). In D. Cartwright, Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper Row.
OECD. (2015). Final Naec Synthesis: New Approaches To Economic Challenges.
OECD. (2017). New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Towards a new narrative. Retrieved from http://oecdinsights.org/2017/06/23/we-need-an-empowering-narrative
Ramos, G. (2017, June 23). We need an empowering narrative. Retrieved 17 August 2017, from http://oecdinsights.org/2017/06/23/we-need-an-empowering-narrative/