Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 4(239) | 155-182

Article title

Konflikty wokół monitoringu jakości powietrza w Polsce. Infrastruktury, standardy i dane

Content

Title variants

EN
Conflicts over Air Quality Monitoring in Poland. Infrastructures, Standards and Data

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
W artykule opisano spory wokół sposobów zbierania danych na temat smogu w Polsce. Ramą teoretyczną analizy są studia nad nauką i technologią, a w szczególności badania nad rolą infrastruktur, standardów i danych. W części opisowej przedstawiono rolę infrastruktury pomiarowej w kształtowaniu relacji pomiędzy różnymi podmiotami zajmujący się pomiarem jakości powietrza, a następnie zanalizowano dwa wymiary konfliktu. Pierwszy z nich dotyczy kwestii metodologicznych i związany jest z rzetelnością pomiaru. Drugi natomiast – ontologii smogu, to znaczy odmiennego ujmowania problemu zanieczyszczenia przez ekspertów i obywateli, co ma przełożenie na praktyki społeczne
EN
The article presents disputes around the ways of collecting data on smog in Poland. The theoretical framework of the analysis is science and technology studies, and in particular the research on the role of infrastructures, standards and data. First, the role of measuring infrastructure in shaping relationships between various entities involved in the measurement of air quality is described. Next, the the two dimensions of the conflict are analyzed. One of them concerns methodological issues and is related to the reliability of measurement. The other is related to the ontology of smog, i.e. a different approach to the problem of pollution by experts and citizens, which influences social practices.

Year

Issue

Pages

155-182

Physical description

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika

References

  • Afeltowicz, Łukasz, Krzysztof Pietrowicz. 2013. Maszyny społeczne. Wszystko ujdzie, o ile działa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Barry, Andrew. 2006. Technological zones. European Journal of Social Theory, 9: 239–253.
  • Bowker, Geoffrey, Star Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classifications and Its Consequences. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Calvillo, Nerea. 2018. Political Airs: From Monitoring to Attuned Sensing Air Pollution. Social Studies of Science, 48: 372–388. DOI: 10.1177/0306312718784656.
  • CBOS (Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej). 2019. Polacy o smogu. Warszawa: CBOS.
  • Cheng, Wenhong Chen, Tu Fangjing, Tu Zheng. 2017. A Transnational Networked Public Sphere of Air Pollution: Analysis of a Twitter Network of PM2,5 From the Risk Society Perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 20: 1005–1023. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2017.1303076.
  • Collins, Harry. 1975. The seven sexes: a study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics. Sociology, 9: 205–224.
  • Corburn, Jason. 2005. Street science. Community knowledge and enivronmental health justice. Cambrigde: MIT Press.
  • Epstein, Steven. 2007. Inclusion: the politics of difference in medical research. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Espeland, Wendy Nelson, Mitchell L. Stevens. 2008. The Sociology of Quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49: 401–436.
  • European Environmental Agency. 2019. Air Quality in Europe – 2019 Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Fortun, Kim, Lindsay Poirier, Alli Morgan, Brandon Costelloe-Kuehn, Mike Fortun. 2016. Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics. Big Data & Society, 3, 2: 1–14.
  • Foucault, Michel. 2010. Terytorium, bezpieczeństwo, populacja. Przekład Michał Herer. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Frankowski, Jan. 2020. Attention: Smog Alert! Citizen Engagement for Clean Air and Its Consequences for Fuel Poverty in Poland. Energy and Buildings, 207: 109525. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109525.
  • Fujimura, Joan H. 1992. Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation’. W: A. Pickering, ed. Science as practice and culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 168–211.
  • Gabrys, Jennifer. 2014a. Program Earth. Enironmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
  • Gabrys, Jennifer. 2014b. Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32, 1: 30–48. DOI: 10.1068/d16812.
  • Gabrys, Jennifer. 2017. Citizen Sensing, Air Pollution and Fracking: From ‘Caring About Air’ to Speculative Practices of Evidence Harm. The Sociological Review Monographs, 65: 172–192. DOI: 10.1177/0081176917710421.
  • Garnett, Emma. 2018. Knowledge Infrastructures of Air Pollution: Tracing the In-Between Spaces of Interdisciplinary Science in Action. W: E. Garnett, J. Reynolds, S. Milton, eds. Ethnographies and Health. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 233–252.
  • Hachem, Sara, Georgios Mathioudakis, Animesh Pathak, Valérie Issarny, Rajiv Bhatia. 2015. Sense2Health: A Quantified Self Application for Monitoring Personal Exposure to Environmental Pollution. SENSORNETS 2015: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01102275/document.
  • Hughes, Thomas P. 1984. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Kirk, Stuart A., Herb Kutchins. 1992. The Selling of DSM: The Rhetoric of Science in Psychiatry. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
  • Kula, Witold. 1970. Miary i ludzie. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Latour, Bruno 1987. Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, Bruno, Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Latour, Bruno. 2009. Dajcie mi laboratorium a poruszę świat. Przekład Łukasz Afeltowicz, Krzysztof Abriszewski. Teksty Drugie, 12: 163–192.
  • Latour, Bruno. 2010. Splatając na nowo to, co społeczne. Przekład Aleksandra Derra, Krzysztof Arbiszewski. Kraków: Universitas.
  • Law, John. 1992. Power, discretion and strategy. W: J. Law, ed. A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge, 165–191.
  • Mallard, Alexandre. 1998. Compare, standardize and settle agreement: on some unusual metrological problems. Social Studies of Science, 28, 4: 571–601.
  • Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham–London: Duke University Press.
  • Mol, Arthur P.J. 2005. Environmental Governance in the Information Age: the Emergence of Informational Governance. Environment Planning C: Government and Policy, 24: 497–514.
  • Murphy, Michelle. 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and the Women Workers. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Nowak, Andrzej W. 2014. Czy możliwa jest metrologiczna suwerenność? Metrologia i ekonomia polityczna miary. Przegląd Humanistyczny, 5: 19–32.
  • Nowak, Andrzej W. 2016. Wyobraźnia ontologiczna. Filozoficzna (re)konstrukcja fronetycznych nauk społecznych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  • O’Connell, Joseph. 1993. Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of Particulars. Social Studies of Science, 23, 1: 129–173.
  • Ottinger, Gwen. 2010a. Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35: 244–270.
  • Ottinger, Gwen. 2010b. Constructing Empowerment Through Interpretations of Environmental Surveillance Data. Surveillance & Society, 8: 221–234.
  • Saito-Jensen, Moeko. 2015. Theories and Methods for Study of Multilevel Environmental Governance. Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research.
  • Schaffer, Simon. 1997. Metrology, metrication, and Victorian values. W: B. Lightman. Victorian science in context. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 438–474.
  • Shapin, Steven, Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice. London: SAGE.
  • Spackman, Christy, Barry A.Burlingame. 2018. Sensory Politics: The Tug-of-War Between Potability and Palatability in Municipal Water Production. Social Studies of Science Social Studies of Science, 48: 350–371. DOI: 10.1177/0306312718778358.
  • Star, Susan L. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientists, 43, 3: 377–391.
  • Star, Susan L., James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 3: 387–420.
  • Thévenot, Laurent. 2009. Governing life by standards: a view from engagements. Social Studies of Science, 39: 793–813. DOI: 10.1177/0306312709338767.
  • Timmermans, Stefan, Marc Berg. 2003. The gold standard. The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Timmermans, Stefan, Steven Epstein. 2010. A World of Standards but not a Standard World: Toward a Sociology of Standards and Standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 69–89. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629.
  • Tomaszyk, Mikołaj. 2017. Action against smog at local government level in relation to urban public transport: evidence from selected Polish cities. Urban Development Issues, 55: 57–66. DOI: 10.2478/udi-2018-0005.
  • Weitz, Nina, Strambo Claudia, Eric Kemp-Benedict, Måns Nilsson. 2017. Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: Insights from integrative governance. Global Environmental Change, 45: 165–173.
  • Winner, Langdon. 1986. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109, 1: 121–136.
  • Woolgar, Steve, Javier Lezaun. 2013. The wrong bin bag: a turn to ontology in science and technology studies?. Social Studies of Science, 43, 3: 321–340. DOI: 10.1177/0306312713488820.
  • Wróblewski, Michał. 2018. Medykalizacja nadpobudliwości. Od globalnego standardu do peryferyjnych praktyk. Kraków: Universitas.
  • Zürn, Michael, Sonja Wälti, Henrik Endrelin. 2010. Introduction. W: M. Zürn, S. Wälti, H. Enderlin, eds. Handbook on Multi-level Governance. Chelenham: Edward Elgar, 1–13.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-a4c2c631-aa9f-4ecd-b892-2f19aee19330
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.