The Influence of hamstring extensibility on spinal and pelvic postures in highly trained paddlers

• Authors: López-Miñarro Pedro A. , Muyor José M. , Alacid Fernando
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

Objectives. To determine whether the degree of hamstring muscle extensibility influences the sagittal spinal curvatures in standing and maximal trunk flexion on young athletes. Methods. Forty-two young elite kayakers (mean age: 15.09 ± 0.63 years) were recruited. Thoracic and lumbar curvatures and pelvic position were evaluated with a Spinal Mouse system in standing position and maximal trunk flexion with knees extended (toe-touch test) and flexed. Hamstring muscle extensibility was determined by passive straight leg raise test (PSLR). The sample was divided into two groups with regard to straight leg raise angle (PSLR < 80º, n=20, and PSLR ≥ 80º, n=20). Results. Subjects with lower extensibility presented higher thoracic angle and a more posterior pelvic tilt in maximal trunk flexion. However, no significant differences were found between both groups when standing. The lumbar curve was not affected by hamstring extensibility. Conclusions. Lower hamstring extensibility is related to increased thoracic curve and more posterior pelvic tilt when maximal trunk flexion is performed, which can overload the spine. A systematic stretching programme to improve hamstring extensibility should be incorporated into training activities.

Keywords

EN

thoracic; lumbar; pelvic; spine; straight leg raise

• Publisher: Politechnika Opolska. Wydział Wychowania Fizycznego i Fizjoterapii
• Journal: Journal of Physical Education & Health - Social Perspective
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 49-56

Dates

published

2013

Contributors

author

López-Miñarro Pedro A.

• University of Murcia (Spain)

author

Muyor José M.

• University of Almería (Spain)

author

Alacid Fernando

• University of Murcia (Spain)

References

• 1. Carregaro R.L., Coury H.J.C. (2009). Does reduced hamstring flexibility affect trunk and pelvic movement strategies during manual handling? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 115-120.
• 2. Congdon R., Bohannon R., Tiberio, D. (2005). Intrinsic and imposed hamstring length influence posterior pelvic rotation during hip flexion. Clinical Biomechanics, 20, 947-951.
• 3. Dewberry M.J., Bohannon R.W., Tiberio D., Murray R., Zannotti C.M. (2003). Pelvic and femoral contributions to bilateral hip flexion by subjects suspended from a bar. Clinical Biomechanics, 18, 1067-1076.
• 4. Esola M.A., McClure P.W., Fitzgerald G.K., Siegler S. (1996). Analysis of lumbar spine and hip motion during forward bending in subjects with and without a history of low back pain. Spine, 21, 71-78.
• 5. Gajdosik R.L., Albert C.R., Mitman J.J. (1994) Influence of hamstring length on the standing position and flexion range of motion of the pelvic angle, lumbar angle, and thoracic angle. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 20, 213-219.
• 6. Gajdosik R.L., Hatcher C.K., Whitsell S. (1992). Influence of short hamstring muscles on the pelvis and lumbar spine in standing and during the toe-touch test. Clinical Biomechanics, 1, 38-42.
• 7. Harrison D.E., Colloca C.J., Harrison D.D., Janik T.J., Haas J.W., Keller T.S. (2005). Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading. European Spine Journal, 14, 234-242.
• 8. Hui S.S., Yuen P.Y. (2000). Validity of the modified back-saver sit-and-reach test: a comparison with other protocols. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 1655-1659.
• 9. Keller T.S., Colloca C.J., Harrison D.E., Harrison D.D., Janik T.J. (2005). Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine. The Spine Journal, 5, 297-300.
• 10. Kendall F.P., McCreary E.K., Provance P.G., Rodgers M.M., Romani W.A. (2005). Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain (5th ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• 11. Li Y., McClure P.W., Pratt N. (1996). The effect of hamstring muscle stretching on standing posture and on lumbar and hip motions during forward bending. Physical Therapy, 76, 836-849.
• 12. Liemohn W, Sharpe GL, and Wasserman JF. (1994). Criterion related validity of the sit-and-reach test. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 8, 91-94.
• 13. López-Miñarro P.A., Alacid F. (2009). Influence of hamstring muscle extensibility on spinal curvatures in young athletes. Science & Sports, 25, 188-193.
• 14. López-Miñarro P.A., Alacid F., Muyor J.M. (2009). Comparación del morfotipo raquídeo y extensibilidad isquiosural entre piragüistas y corredores. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, 36, 379-392.
• 15. López-Miñarro P.A., Rodríguez P.L. (2010). Hamstring muscle extensibility influences the criterionrelated validity of sit-and-reach and toe-touch tests. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24, 1013-1018
• 16. López-Miñarro P.A., Sáinz de Baranda P., Rodríguez-García P.L. (2009). A comparison of the sit-andreach test and the back-saver sit-and-reach test in university students. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 8, 116-122.
• 17. López-Miñarro P.A., Sáinz de Baranda P., Rodríguez-García P.L. and Yuste J.L. (2008). Comparison between sit-and-reach test and V sit-and-reach test in young adults. Gazzetta Medica Italiana, 167, 135-142.
• 18. McGill S.M. (2002) Low back disorders. Evidence-Based prevention and rehabilitation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• 19. Miñarro P.A., Andújar P.S., García P.L., Toro E.O. (2007). A comparison of the spine posture among several sit-and-reach test protocols. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 10, 456-462.
• 20. Nelson R.T., Bandy W.D. (2004). Eccentric training and static stretching improve hamstring flexibility of high school males. Journal of Athletic Training, 39, 254-258.
• 21. Norris C.M. (2000). Back Stability. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
• 22. Polga D.J., Beaubien B.P., Kallemeier P.M., Schellhas K.P., Lee W.D., Buttermann G.R., Wood K.B. (2004). Measurement of in vivo intradiscal pressure in healthy thoracic intervertebral discs. Spine, 29, 1320-1324.
• 23. Potvin J.R., McGill S.M., Norman R.W. (1991). Trunk muscle and lumbar ligament contributions to dynamic lifts with varying degrees of trunk flexion. Spine, 16, 1099-1107.
• 24. Reid D.A., McNair P.J. (2004). Passive force, angle, and stiffness changes after stretching of hamstring muscles. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36, 1944-1948.
• 25. Rodríguez P.L., Santonja F., López-Miñarro P.A., Sáinz de Baranda P., and Yuste J.L. (2008). Effect of physical education programme on sit-and-reach score in schoolchildren. Science & Sports, 23, 170-175.
• 26. Rodríguez-García P.L., López-Miñarro P.A., Yuste J.L., Sáinz de Baranda P. (2008). Comparison of hamstring criterion-related validity, sagittal spinal curvatures, pelvic tilt and score between sit-andreach and toe-touch tests in athletes. Medicina dello Sport, 61, 11-20.
• 27. Sahrmann S.A. (2002). Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St. Louis: Mosby.
• 28. Santonja Medina F.M., Sainz de Baranda Andújar P., Rodríguez García P.L., López Miñarro P.A., Canteras Jornada M. (2007). Effects of frequency of static stretching on straight-leg raise in elementary school children. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 47, 304-308.
• 29. Sjolie A.N. (2004). Associations between activities and low back pain in adolescent. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 352-359.
• 30. Smith A., O´Sullivan P., Strajer L. (2008). Classification of sagittal thoraco-lumbo-pelvic alignment of the adolescence spine in standing and its relationship to low back pain. Spine, 33, 2101-2107.
• 31. Tully E.A., Stillman B.C. (1997) Computer-aided video analysis of vertebrofemoral motion during toe touching in healthy subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 759-766.
• 32. Wilke H.J., Neef P., Hinz B., Seidel H., Claes L.E. (2001). Intradiscal pressure together with anthropometric data - a data set for the validation of models. Clinical Biomechanics, 1, S111-S126.