PL EN


2018 | 6 | 2 | 119-132
Article title

Situated Identities in the Discourse of Insurance: A Comparative Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese and British Insurance Contracts

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This paper is a comparative critical discourse analysis of Chinese and British insurance contracts. It analyses the similarities and differences in the identities that emerge from the situatedness of the insured and the insurer in the contracts in order to determine the extent to which the sociocultural context within which the texts were conceived shape the texts. The study draws on the positioning theory and the notions of situated identity/situated meaning and is informed by analytic tools within critical discourse analysis. It found that in both the Chinese and British contracts, the insurer is linguistically and discursively situated as a powerful and resourceful ‘regulator’ (i.e. an active force) whereas the insured is mostly constructed in subjective and somewhat ‘weak/vulnerable’ terms. This similarity notwithstanding, the study found differences in terms of the kind of power relation, the level of formality or social distance and the dominant type of language evident in the two contracts. The Chinese contract was found to display a much stronger power relation and a more highly/strictly level of formality than the British contract. And whereas the Chinese contract was predominantly couched in very legal terms, the British contract had a more businessoriented focus. These differences demonstrate how (insurance) discourse may be shaped by the social and cultural contexts in which it is conceived and, possibly, sculpt the identities ofall those addressed.
Year
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
119-132
Physical description
Dates
published
2018-12-30
Contributors
author
author
References
  • An, Lizhi. (2016). The understanding of the current social pattern in China and the corresponding attitude of Chinese trade unions - rethinking the ‘two strongs and one weak’. Trade Unions’ Tribune (Journal of Shandong Institute of Trade Unions’ Administration Cadres), 12(6), 6-8.
  • Abraham, K. (2013). Four conceptions of insurance. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 161(3), 653-698.
  • Alexander, C. N. & Lauderdale, P. (1977). Situated identity and social influence. Sociometry, 40(3), 225-233.
  • Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: analysis of a newspaper corpus. London and New York: Continuum.
  • Bhatia, A. (2009). The discourses of terrorism. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 279-289.
  • Davies, B. & Harre, R. (1999). Positioning and pesonhoood. In: R. Harre & L. van Lagenhove (eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • De Bettignies, H., Lepineux, F. & Tan, C. (2006). The insurance business and its image in society: Traditional issues and new challenges. Working Paper Series INSEAD, 1-171.
  • Djieufack, R. (2016). The seller’s liability for the non-conformity of goods in a contract of sale under the OHADA uniform act on general commercial law: A critical analysis. Journal of African Law, 60(3), 469-490.
  • Edu-Buandoh, D. F. (2012). Situated identities in institutional discourse: Deconstructing the 2010 University of Cape Coast Students’ Handbook. In: D. F. Edu-Buandoh & A. B. Appartaim (eds.) Between language and literature: A festschrift for Professor Kofi Edu Yankson. Cape Coast: Cape Coast University Press.
  • Edu-Buandoh, H., & Ahialey, H. (2012). Exploring the ideological implications of questions in elicitation in courtroom cross-examination in Ghana. Language, Discourse & Society, 1(2), 11-30.
  • Eldin, A. A. T. S. (2014). Critical discourse analysis of religious sermons in Egypt – Case study of Amr Khalid’s sermons. International Education Studies, 7(11), 68-75.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. Essex: Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. (2001) 2nd (ed.). Language and power. Essex: Pearson Education.
  • Fairclough, N. (2003) Analyzing discourse: Text analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
  • Fairclough, N. (2005a) ‘Critical discourse analysis’. Marges Linguistiques, 9, 76-94.
  • Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (2010). Critical discourse analysis. In: T. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse analysis: A multidisciplinary introduction, pp. 357-377. London: Routledge.
  • Fowler, R. (1991). Critical linguistics. In: K. Malmkjaer (ed.) The Linguistics Encyclopedia, pp. 89-83. London: Routledge.
  • Gatzert, N., Huber, C. & Schmeiser, H. (2011). On the valuation of investment guarantees in unit- linked life insurance: A customer perspective. The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics Geneva Papers, 36, 3-29.
  • Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
  • Gee, J. P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York: Routledge.
  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre.
  • Hall, S. (1996). Who needs “identity”? Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage.
  • Harre, R. & Langenhove, L. (eds.) (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Malden: Blackwell.
  • Johnson, A. S. (2004). Recruiting and recognizing multiple socially situated identities: Consonance and contradiction in the pedagogy of a male pre-service early educator. Contemporary Issues in EarlyChildhood, 5(1), 19-34.
  • Kasri, N. S. (2013). A critical analysis of the resolution of the Shariah advisory council securities commission Malaysia: A case study of the crude palm oil futures contract. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 5(2), 141-146.
  • Liu, Z. (2010). Interaction relationship between agricultural insurance and transfer of land contract rights based on game analysis of farmer selection. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1, 187-192.
  • McCarthey, S. J. & Moje, E. B. (2002). Identity matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 228-238.
  • Mohammed, H. I. (2006). Academic writing as social practice: A critical discourse analysis of student writing in higher education in Tanzania. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Niemim-Kiesilainen, N., Honkatukia, P. & Ruuskanen, M. (2007). Legal texts as discourses. In Svensson, Gunnarsson & Davies M. (eds.) Exploiting the Limits of Law, pp. 69-88. London: Ashgate.
  • Ravas, O., Monea, M. & David, A. (2011). Comparative analysis of the insurance contract rules and regulations from the view of the provisions stipulated in the new civil code. Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 11(3), 263-270.
  • Sabido, R. S. (2015). Palestine in the British press: A postcolonial critical discourse analysis. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 8(3), p. 199.
  • Singh, J., Lentz, P. & Nijssen, E. J. (2011). First- and second-order effects of consumers' institutional logics on firm-consumer relationships: A cross-market comparative analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 307-333.
  • Smith, P. (1988). Discerning the subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Smythe, S. (2006). The good mother: A critical discourse analysis of literacy advice to mothers in the twentieth century. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Thomas, L. & Wareing, J. S. (1999). Language, society and power: An introduction. London: Routledge.
  • Tripathy, B. (2016). A critical analysis of the cyber contract using electronic mail. Proceedings of the second international conference on information and communication technology for competitive strategies Article No. 34, pp. 1-6.
  • Van der Bank, C. M. (2008). Non-renewal of fixed-term contracts: Critical analysis of award. International Journal of Law and Management, 50(4), 158-167.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1, 17-27.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology. London: Sage.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In: D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 352- 371, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wang, W. & Peng, H. (2016). A discourse study of insurance sales agent-client interactions in
  • China’s rural areas from the perspective of topic management. English Language and Literature Studies, 6(2), 146-160.
  • Zhang, Chongchen. (2011). Social etiquette in traditional Chinese culture. Secretary’s Companion, 2, 9-12.
Notes
EN
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-a6318710-fec4-45df-a2d2-d0632b957edf
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.