The ethnic conflict over Karabakh in the context of the activities of the military-political representations of the Great Britain in the Transcaucasia (1918-1920)

• Authors: VIRABYAN Vanik , VIRABYAN Hrant
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In 1918-20s the steps of military politics of Azerbaijani were directed towards the frustration of Armenian State system. With this intention, Andranik’s and Dro’s forces were taken out, with the help of British generals Thomson and Shutleworth. This allowed Azerbaijani families on the 21 of August in 1912 make the Armenian council In Karabagh temporarily obey Azerbaijani Government till the solution of this disputable issue by the French conference of allied union, which was one of the beforehand planned cunning steps of Azerbaijani government. In reality, as a result t of later important military changes in the Republic of Armenia and as a result of mutually beneficial agreement between Russian and Kemal Turkey as well as taking into consideration the evident connivance of allied powers during 1920-23 Azerbaijani managed to capture not only Nachijevan, but Karabagh and other Armenian lands, as well, the struggle for which restarted in 1988-1990.

Keywords

EN

Ethnic Conflict; Karabakh; Republic of Armenia; Azerbaijan; Russia; Great Britain; Baku

• Publisher: Uniwersytet w Siedlcach
• Journal: Historia i Świat
• Year: 2024
• Volume: 13
• Pages: 339–360

Contributors

author

VIRABYAN Vanik

• Armenian State Pedagogical University, Yerevan, Armenia

author

VIRABYAN Hrant

• Armenian State Pedagogical University, Yerevan, Armenia)

References

• Akhmedova, F. (2009), Vopros statusa Nagornogo Karabaxa: Istoriya i sovremennosth [The question of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh: History and modernity]. In Karabax vchera, segodnya i zavtra. Materiali naushno-prakticheskix konferencii. Vtoraya chast (pp. 172–178). Baku: Organizaciya Osvobojdeniya Karabaxa. (in Russian)
• Balayan, V. (2002). Artsakhi patmutyuny hnadaric minchev mer orery [History of Artsakh from ancient times to the present day]. Yerevan։ Amaras hrat (in Armenian)
• Harutyunyan, H.M. (1996). Lernain Karabaxy 1918-1921 tt [Nagorno-Karabakh 1918-1921]. Yervan: HH GAA. (in Armenian)
• Hasanli, J. (2016). Foreign Policy of the Republic of Azerbaijan: The Difficult Road to Western Integration, 1918-1920. London & New York: Routledge.
• Hoch, T. (2020). The Roots of Ethno-Political Mobilization in Nagorno-Karabakh. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 47(3), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.30965/18763324-20201370
• Hovhannisyan, R.G. (2005). Hayastani Hanrapetutyun: Hator I, Arajin Tari. 1918-1919 [Republic of Armenia. Volume I. First Year 1918-1919]. Yerevan: Tigran Mec. (in Armenian)
• Hovhannisyan, R.G. (2014). Hayastani Hanrapetutyun. Hator II. Versalis-London. 1919-1920 [Republic of Armenia. Volume II. From Versailles to London 1919-1920]. Yerevan: Tigran Mec. (in Armenian)
• Hovhannisyan, R.G. (2015). Hayastani Hanrapetutyun. Hator III․ Londonic Sevr. Petrvar-ogostos․ 1920 [Republic of Armenia. Volume III. From London to Serves, February-August 1920]. Yerevan: Tigran Mec. (in Armenian)
• Imranli-Lowe, K. (2023). The Nagorno-Karabakh Confict International Law Appraisal. In M. Hakan Yavuz, M.M. Gunter (Eds.), The Nagorno-Karabakh Confict Historical and Political Perspectives (pp. 15–27). London & New York: Routledge.
• Isgenderli A. (2011). Realities of Azerbaijan. 1917-1920. Washington: Xibris Corporation.
• Ishkhanyan, E. (1999). Lernain Karabax 1917-1920 [Nagorno-Karabakh 1917-1920]. Yerevan: Hayastan. (in Armenian)
• Khatisean, A. (1968). Hayastani Hanrapetutean cagumn u zargacumy [Origin and development of the Republic of Armenia]. Bejrut: Hamazgaini. (in Armenian)
• Lang, D., Walker, K. (1992). Haiery: (Hai jogovrdi patmutyun) [Armenians. History of Armenia]. Yerevan. «Haikakan hanragitarani glxavor xmbagrutyun». (in Armenian)
• Leo, (Babakhanyan A. G.). (2009). Ancialic. Hushagrutyn [From the past. Memoirs]. Yerevan: Shem hratar. (in Armenian)
• Mirzayev, F. (2023). The Nagorno-Karabakh Confict International Law Appraisal. In M. Hakan Yavuz, M.M. Gunter (Eds.), The Nagorno-Karabakh Confict Historical and Political Perspectives (pp. 168–203). London & New York: Routledge.
• Nadzhafov, B. (1994). Lico vraga. Istoriya armyanskogo nacionalizma v Zakavkazye v konce XIX- nachale XX veka [The Face of the Enemy. The History of Armenian Nationalism in Transcaucasia in the Late 19th - Early 20th Century]. Baku: Izdatelsrvo «Sharg-Garb». (in Russian)
• Pilipchuk Yar V. (2021), Azerbaydjannskoe gosudarstvo v kontekste russko-tureckix otnoshenii [South Caucasia In The Context Of Social, Economic And Political Progress]. In V. Kurban, M. Duranli (Eds.), The Post-Cold War Era (pp. 105–187). Ankara: Iksad Publishing House. (in Russian)
• Poghosyan, S., Ghrmajyan, G. (2023). The position of the Entente States on the idea of Armenia’s independence (1917 and early 1918). Historia i Świat, 12, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.34739/his.2023.12.17
• Sarur [Asur] (1929), Karabaxi kcumy Adrbejani [The Accession of Karabakh to Azerbaijan]. Hayreniq amsagir, 8, 128–147. (in Armenian)
• Tumanyan, M. (2012). Diplomaticheskaya istoriya Respubliki Armeniya 1918-1920 gg. [Diplomatic history of the Republic of Armenia 1918-1920]. Yerevan: Nacionalni arxiv Armenii. (in Russian)
• Virabyan, V. (2004), Hayastany Andrkovkasyan Hanrapetutyunneri 1920 t. Aprilyan vehajogovum [Armenia on the conference of the Transcaucasian republics in April 1920]. Yerevan: «Asogik» hrat. (in Armenian)
• Vracyan, S. (1958). Hayastani Hanrapetutiun [Republic of Armenia]. Beyrut: tparan «Mshak». (in Armenian)
• Vracyan, S. (1993). Hayastani Hanrapetutyun [Republic of Armenia]. Yerevan: Hayastan hrat. (in Armenian)
• Waal, de T. (2005). Chernii sad. Armenia i Azerbaydjan mejdu mirom i voynoy [Black Garden. Armenia and Azerbaijan between peace and war]. Moskva: izdatelstvo Tekst. (in Russian)

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.34739/his.2024.13.20