Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 1(24) | 28–41

Article title

The Implications of the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor for Pakistan–European Union Relations

Content

Title variants

RU
Последствия китайско-пакистанского экономического коридора для отношений между Пакистаном и Европейским Союзом

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) holds the potential to transform Pakistan along with its turbulent regional environment. In the short run, the multiple networks of infrastructure that the project provides will eventually improve Pakistan–European Union (EU) trade. Moreover, while the CPEC is unlikely to bring an immediate strategic shift in the bilateral dialogue, which is particularly lacking in political dynamics, its long-run promises can help to foster such dynamics. The project, if successful, can help Pakistan to establish a peaceful domestic environment and subsequently promote the country’s fresh image to reverse its soft power losses in Europe and beyond. This paper investigates contemporary Pakistan–EU relations, which have so far attracted little attention from international relations scholars. It presents the bilateral dynamics in the context of the CPEC, which is an unprecedented investment by China in Pakistan. The paper concludes by shedding light on the differences between China’s and the EU’s strategies vis-à-vis Pakistan. Despite the fact that the study focuses on one particular South Asian state, it can serve as a case study for the comparative analysis of China’s and the EU’s presence in third countries, especially those that, like Pakistan, have joined the Belt and Road Initiative. The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) holds the potential to transform Pakistan along with its turbulent regional environment. In the short run, the multiple networks of infrastructure that the project provides will eventually improve Pakistan–European Union (EU) trade. Moreover, while the CPEC is unlikely to bring an immediate strategic shift in the bilateral dialogue, which is particularly lacking in political dynamics, its long-run promises can help to foster such dynamics. The project, if successful, can help Pakistan to establish a peaceful domestic environment and subsequently promote the country’s fresh image to reverse its soft power losses in Europe and beyond. This paper investigates contemporary Pakistan–EU relations, which have so far attracted little attention from international relations scholars. It presents the bilateral dynamics in the context of the CPEC, which is an unprecedented investment by China in Pakistan. The paper concludes by shedding light on the differences between China’s and the EU’s strategies vis-à-vis Pakistan. Despite the fact that the study focuses on one particular South Asian state, it can serve as a case study for the comparative analysis of China’s and the EU’s presence in third countries, especially those that, like Pakistan, have joined the Belt and Road Initiative.
RU
Китайско-пакистанский экономический коридор (CPEC) может изменить Паки¬стан вместе с его нестабильной международной обстановкой. В краткосрочной перспективе инфраструктурные сети, созданные в рамках проекта, улучшат торговлю между Пакистаном и Европейским Союзом (ЕС). Однако улучшение торговых отношений не приведет к стратегическому прорыву в тех двусторонних отношениях, в которых отсутствует прежде всего политическая динамика, стиму¬лировать которую могут долгосрочные последствия CPEC. Проект, если он будет завершен, создаст Пакистану возможность продвигать свой новый имидж и, как следствие, компенсировать потери мягкой силы в Европе и мире. В данной статье рассматриваются отношения между Пакистаном и ЕС, которые не привлекают значительного внимания со стороны исследователей международных отношений. В статье представлены двусторонние отношения в контексте беспрецедентных инвестиций Китая в Пакистанe. И наконец, статья проливает свет на различия в стратегиях Китая и ЕС по отношению к Пакистану. Хотя она посвящена Па¬кистану, может служить примером сравнительных исследований присутствия ЕС и Китая в странах, особенно в тех, которые, как и Пакистан, присоединились к китайской инициативе «Пояс и дорога».

Year

Volume

Pages

28–41

Physical description

Contributors

  • Collegium Civitas

References

  • EC. (2016). Report on the Generalised Scheme of Preferences Covering the Period 2014- 2015. Retrieved from: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/january/tra¬doc_154180.pdf.
  • EC. (2017a). International Cooperation and Development. Countries: Pakistan. Re¬trieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/countries/pakistan_en?qt-node _tabs_country_=1#qt-node_tabs_country_.
  • EC. (2017b). GSP +. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/import-and-export-rules/ import-into-eu/gsp-rules/gsp+/.
  • EC. (2017c). List of countries benefiting from the EU’s Special Incentive Arrangement for Sustainable Development and Good Governance (GSP+). Retrieved from: http:// trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2017/july/tradoc_155842.pdf.
  • EC. (2019). European Union, Trade in goods with Pakistan. Retrieved from: https://web-gate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/country/details_pakistan_en.pdf.
  • EEAS. (2019). EU-Pakistan Relations–Factsheet. Retrieved from: https://eeas.europa.eu/ sites/eeas/files/factsheet_eu_pakistan_june_2019.pdf.
  • EU Grants GSP Plus Status to Pakistan. (2013, December 12). The Dawn. Retrieved from: https://www.dawn.com/news/1072051.
  • EU-Pakistan 5-year Engagement Plan. (2012). Retrieved from: https://eeas.europa.eu/ sites/eeas/files/eu-pakistan_five-year_engagement_plan.pdf.
  • EU-Pakistan Strategic Engagement Plan. (2019). Retrieved from: https://eeas.europa.eu/ sites/eeas/files/eu-pakistan_strategic_engagement_plan.pdf.
  • Iqbal, A. (2017). Official Message. CPEC Official Website Retrieved from: http://cpec. gov.pk/messages/4.
  • Islam, S. (2012, May 7). What Next in EU-Pakistan Relationship? The Dawn. Retrieved from: https://www.dawn.com/news/724124.
  • Jaffrelot, Ch. (2016) Introduction: Pakistan the Interface State. In: Ch. Jaffrelot (eds.), Pakistan at the Crossroads. Domestic Dynamics and External Pressures (1–22). Gur¬gaon: Random House India.
  • Kuszewska A., Nitza-Makowska A. (2017). Selected Aspects of Pakistan’s Post-2013 Foreign Policy, IAAPS [Indian Association of Asian and Pacific Studies] Perspective, 2, 33–46.
  • Nye, J.S.Jr. (1990). Soft power, Foreign Policy, 80 (Autumn), 153–171.
  • Pakistan Business Council. (2017). Post-Brexit Feasibility of a Pakistan-UK Free Trade Agreement. Retrieved from: http://pbc.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ Post-Brexit_Feasibility_of_a_Pakistan-UK_Free_Trade_Agreement.pdf.
  • Pew Research Centre. (2017a). Confidence in Merkel. Retrieved from: http://www.pew-global.org/database/indicator/29/country/166/.
  • Pew Research Centre. (2017b). World’s Leading Economic Power. Retrieved from: https://www.pewglobal.org/database/indicator/17/country/166/response/European +Union/.
  • Pew Research Centre (2009). Americans and Western Europeans Agree on Afghan¬istan-Pakistan Extremist Threat Consensus Despite Divisions on Afghan War. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2009/11/11/the-extremist -threat-in-afghanistan-and-pakistan/.
  • Rafi, A.E. (2016, July 11). Completion of CPEC: Impact on Pakistan’s Strategic Position and Economy. Islamabad Political Research Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.ipripak. org/completion-of-cpec-impact-on-pakistans-strategic-position-and-economy/.
  • Syed, B.S. (2016, November 26).UK Looking to Reinvigorate Ties with Pakistan: Johnson. The Dawn. Retrieved from http://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage =28_11_2016_001_008.
  • Vandewalle, L. (2015). Pakistan and China: “Iron Brothers” Forever? European Parliament – Directorate-General for External Policies. Retrieved from: http://www.europarl. europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/549052/EXPO_IDA(2015)549052_EN.pdf.
  • Wolf, S.O. (2018). China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Regional Cooperation in the Wider South Asian Region, in: B.R. Deepak (ed.) China’s Global Rebalancing and the New Silk Road, New Delhi: Springer (85–100).
  • Wolf, S.O. (2019). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor of the Belt and Road Initiative. Concept, Context and Assessment. Springer.
  • Yanzhong, H., Ding, S. (2006). Dragon’s Underbelly: An Analysis of China’s Soft Power. East Asia, 23, 22–44.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-a80ca4ad-6942-4fc5-914a-be514d30d356
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.