2018 | 2(44) | 71-81
Article title

Co-production as a tool for realisation of public services

Title variants
Languages of publication
Objective: New public governance is one of the most popular paradigms in public administration management. The aim of this article is to examine the co-production of public services, which is gaining interest in many European countries, including Poland, and to find out how co-production is defined, what the reasons to pay attention to this tool are, how we can distinguish between different models of co-production and, last but not least, what the possibilities and drawbacks of introducing it into practice are. Research Design & Methods: The article is a literature review based on the most important public management journals. Findings: In conclusion, the author shows new ways of defining co-production and presents a proposal for further research strategies for the co-production of public services. Implications / Recommendations: The meaning of co-production of public services has varied over the last few years due to the fact that various new elements have emerged. Therefore there is still a huge field, to cover such as conducting research about the use of social media in the co-production of public services. Contribution / Value Added: The most recent literature review about co-production was conducted by Vooberg in 2014. As a result, this article refreshes the knowledge about it and proposes a new research agenda for the future.
  • WSB University in Toruń Department of Finance and Management in Bydgoszcz
  • Alford, J. (2009). Engaging Public Sector Clients. From Service Delivery to Co-production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Alford, J., & Head, B. (2017). Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy and Society, 36(3), 397–413.
  • Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2018). Co-production and Co-creation. Engaging Citizens in Public Services. London: Routledge.
  • Brudney, J., & England, R. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65.
  • Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860.
  • Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2016a). User and community co-production of public services: What does the evidence tell us? International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1006–1019.
  • Bovaird, T., & Loffler, E. (Eds.). (2016b). Public Management and Governance. New York: Routledge.
  • Bovaird, T., Ryzin, G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective coproduction of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 1–23.
  • Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2014). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public service. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.
  • Ciasullo, M., Palumbo, R., & Troisi, O. (2017). Reading public service co-production through the lenses of requisite variety. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(2), 1–13.
  • Eijk, C., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2017). Co-producing safety in the local community: A Q-methodology study on the incentives of Belgian and Dutch members of neighbourhood watch schemes. Local Government Studies, 43(3), 323–343.
  • Farr, M. (2016). Co-production and value co-creation in outcome-based contracting in public services. Public Management Review, 18(5), 654–672.
  • Fledderus, J. (2015). Building trust through public service co-production. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(7), 550–565.
  • Fugini, M., Bracci, E., & Sicilia, M. (Eds.). (2016). Co-production in the Public Sector. Experiences and Challenges. Milan: Springer.
  • Gawłowski, R. (2018). Co-production of public services in terms of the Polish experience. Polish Political Science Yearbook, 47(1), 110–120.
  • Mazur, S. (Ed.). (2015). Public Governance. Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
  • Hausner, J. (2015). Governance and its conceptual foundations. In S. Mazur (Ed.), Public Governance (pp. 17–36). Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
  • Mazur, S. (Ed.). (2018). Public Policy and the Neo-Weberian State. New York: Routledge.
  • Meijer, A. (2016). Co-production as a structural transformation of the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(6), 596–611.
  • OECD. (2011). Together for Public Services. Partnering with Citizens and Civil Society.
  • Osborne, D., & Geabler, T. (1993). How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Toronto: Penguin Group.
  • Osborne, S., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24(S1), S31–S47.
  • Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Coproduction and the co-creation of value in public services. Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653.
  • Ostrom, E. (1972). Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 53(3), 474–493.
  • Ostrom, V., Ostrom, E. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31, 203–216.
  • Podgórniak-Krzykacz, A. (2015). Co-production for local public services – a case study of the cooperative Hallenbad Norten-Hardenbert. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 2(30), 165–176.
  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform. A comparative analysis: new public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Radnor, Z., Osborne, S., Kinder, T., & Mutton J. (2014). Operationalising co-production in public services delivery. The contribution of service blueprinting. Public Management Review, 16(3), 402–423.
  • Stoker, G. (2006). Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Sześciło, D. (2015a). Współzarządzanie jako koprodukcja usług publicznych. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 1(31), 13–21.
  • Sześciło, D. (2015b). Governance in public services. In S. Mazur (Ed.), Public Governace (pp. 286–301). Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
  • Sześciło, D. (2017). Administracja neoweberowska: biurokracja 2.0?, article available on the website (accessed on 14.06.2017).
  • Thomas, J. (2012). Citizen, Customer, Partner. Engaging the Public in Public Management. New York: M.E. Sharp Inc.
  • Virtanen, P., & Stenvall, J. (2014). The evolution of public services form co-production to co-creation and beyond. The International Journal of Leadership in Public Service, 10(2), 100–115.
  • Voorberg, W. (2017). Co-Creation and Co-Production as a Strategy for Public Service Innovation: A study to their appropriateness in a public sector context. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
  • Vooberg, W., Bekkers V., & Trummers L. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357.
  • Warren, A., Sulaiman, A., & Jaafar, N. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions, Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 291–301.
  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Witte, K., & Geys, B. (2013). Citizen co-production and efficient public good provision: Theory and evidence from public libraries. European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 137–148.
  • Zdybała, A. (2012). Polityki publiczne. Doświadczenia w tworzeniu i wykonywaniu programów publicznych w Polsce i innych krajach. Warszawa: Krajowa Szkoła Administracji Publicznej.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.