Institutions and Modernity

• Authors: Witold Morawski
• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

Purpose: Modernity consists of many confl icting aspects: It brings many empty promises, yet has resulted in new institutions that create bridges between the values and interests of millions of people who seek freedom, prosperity, quality of life, strengthened democracy and social justice. In this paper I attempt to a gain and loss account against modernity, because institutional rules are not only conducive to cooperative interactions, but to hostile interactions as well. People are not always guided by moral commitment, but rather more often driven by cold calculation or coercion. Methodology: Modernity has at least three defi nitions. The fi rst defi nition is based on ideas that took over the imagination of the era. The second defi nition is based on an analysis of the behavior of people who respond to reason as well as emotion and believe that they act more rationally than their ancestors or the traditional “others”. The third defi nition is the one closest to my heart, consisting of the use of institutional categories. Institutions offer practical ways of connecting ideas and people. The challenge for them is the result of deepening local and national interdependencies, but increasingly often also regional (e.g. European) and global. Interdependencies are the result of the scientifi c and technological revolution, global markets, global governance mechanisms, the emergence of new social forces and cultural confl icts (against the background of reconciling identity and differences). Conclusions: The most important task is to identify the mechanisms of complex systems so that people know how to act under conditions of uncertainty, risk and crisis. Hence, the expectations toward institutions often exceed their abilities. Even though new institutions are being created and old ones are being fixed, we are witnessing and participating in, institutional paralysis and the decay (e.g. corruption). In this situation, it is imperative not only to improve control methods (e.g. legal), but also to resort to normative systems (values and identity) and knowledge (competence and skills). The source of this paralysis is often man himself, convinced of his own maturity and equipped with all sorts of rights, but manipulated on a scale not yet seen in the past. We are experiencing our own struggle as to what roles are closest to us, e.g. consumer, investor, or citizen? Research Implications: Modernity is an emblematic, but confusing term. Therefore, the most important task is to identify the activities of complex systems, so that people know how to act under conditions of uncertainty, risk and crisis. People – agencies must operate in structures that defi ne the boundaries of their actions. The main task of social sciences is to identify the conditions for the construction of successful confi gurations of agencies and structures. Originality: Sometimes the “old” is better than the “new”, but to adopt this as a principle of life would be a mistake. It is better to think that the “new” is a metamorphosis of the “old”, sometimes expected, sometimes not. Based on the example of capitalism – fi rst commercial capitalism, then industrial capitalism, and today fi nancial capitalism – I demonstrate how the mechanisms of institutional morphogenesis work, with emphasis on structured cooperation and organized confl ict.

Keywords

EN

modernity; institution; institutional morphogenesis; bounded rationality; complex interdependence

• Publisher: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Management and Business Administration. Central Europe
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 3(122)
• Pages: 30-49

Dates

published

2013-09-15

Contributors

author

Witold Morawski

• Kozminski University

References

• Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.A.(2012). Why Nations Fail. The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.
• Archer, M. (1990). Theory, Culture and Post-Industrial Society. In: M. Featherstone (ed.), Global Culture, Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
• Arendt, H. (2000). Kondycja ludzka. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
• Bartkowski, J. (2012). Globalizacja i opinia publiczna w Polsce. In: W. Morawski (ed.), Powiązania zewnętrzne. Modernizacja Polski. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Barzun, J. (2000). From Dawn to Decadence. 500 Years of Western Cultural Life. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
• Bauman, Z. (2012). Więc będzie wojna? Tomasz Kwaśniewski pyta, profesor Zygmunt Bauman odpowiada. Gazeta Wyborcza, 14–15 April: 14–17.
• Beiner, R. (2011). Civil Religion. A dialogue in the history of political philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bell, D. (1994). Kulturowe sprzeczności kapitalizmu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Berger, P.L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy. Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. New York: Anchor Books.
• Bokszański Z. (2012). Postawy wobec kraju a modernizacja. Polacy w świetle porównań międzynarodowych. In: W. Morawski (ed.), Powiązania zewnętrzne. Modernizacja Polski. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Polska.
• Bremmer, I. (2010). The End of the Free market. Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? New York: Portfolio – Penguin Group.
• Chmielewski, P. (2012). Homo agens. Instytucjonalizm w naukach społecznych. Warszawa: Poltext.
• Conrad, J. (1996). Oxford Concise Dictionary of Quotations. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
• Diggins, J.P. (2010). Iluzje pragmatyzmu. Modernizm oraz kryzys poznania i autorytetu. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Łośgraf.
• Dumond, L. (2009). Homo hierarchicus. System kastowy i jego implikacje. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy „Nomos”.
• Eisenstadt, S. (2009). Utopia i nowoczesność. Porównawcza analiza cywilizacji. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
• Fligstein, N. (2008). Euro-Clash. The EU, European Identity, and The Future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fukuyama, F. (2012). Historia ładu politycznego. Od czasów przedludzkich do rewolucji francuskiej. Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis.
• Galbraith, J.K.(1977). The Affluent Society. London: Andre Deutsch.
• Goody, J. (1983). The development of the Family and Marriage in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Goody, J. (2009). Kradzież historii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Grande, E., Pauly, L.W. (2007). Complex Sovereignty. Reconstituting Political Authority in Twenty-first Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Huntington, S.P (1986). Political System and Political Decay. In: I. Kabashima, L. White III. (red.), Political System and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Le Goff, J. (2011). Średniowiecze i pieniądze. Warszawa: Czytelnik.
• Koźmiński, A.K., Latusek-Jurczak, D. (2011) Rozwój teorii organizacji. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Krasnodębski, Z. (1991). Upadek idei postępu. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
• Lindblom, Ch.E. (1977). Politics and Markets. The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.
• Luhmann, N. (1998). Observations on modernity. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• Maizner, K. (2009). Challenges of Complexity in the 21st Century. An Interdisciplinary Introduction. European Review, 17(2): 219–236.
• March, J.G., Simon H.A.(1964). Teoria organizacji. Warszawa: PWN.
• Morawski W. (2010). Konfiguracje globalne. Struktury, agencje, instytucje. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Morawski W. (2012). Wprowadzenie: Współzależności i powiązania zewnętrzne jako uwarunkowania modernizacji w Polsce. W: W. Morawski (red.), Powiązania zewnętrzne. Modernizacja Polski. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Morris, I. (2010). Why the West Rules – For Now. The patterns of history, and what they reveal about the future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Groux.
• Mulewicz, J. (2012). Mumia Europejska. Rzeczpospolita, 11 lipca.
• Murray, J.W.(2011). Brugia. Kolebka kapitalizmu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
• Postman, N. (2004). Technopol. Triumf techniki nad kulturą. Warszawa: Muza SA.
• Reich, R.B. (2007). Supercapitalism. The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life. New York; Alfred A. Knopf.
• Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage Publications.
• Rodrik, D. (2011). Jedna ekonomia, wiele recept. Globalizacja, instytucje i wzrost gospodarczy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
• Roubini, N., Mihm, S. (2012). Ekonomia kryzysu. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
• Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, cal.:Sage.
• Sedlacek, T. (2012). Ekonomia Dobra i Zła. W poszukiwaniu istoty ekonomii od Gilgamesza do Wall Street. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Studio Emka.
• Sennett, R. (1992). The Fall of Public Man. New York–London: W.W. Norton & Company.
• Sloterdijk, P. (2011). Kryształowy pałac. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
• Smith, A.D. (2008). The Cultural Foundations of Nations. Hierarchy, Covenant, and Republic. Malden–Oxford–Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
• Sztompka, P. (2005). Socjologia zmian społecznych. Kraków: Znak.
• Taylor, Ch. (2001). Two Theories of Modernity. In: D.P. Gaonkar (red.), Alternative Modernities. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
• Touraine, A. (2011). Myśleć inaczej. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
• Weber, M. (1944). Etyka protestancka a duch kapitalizmu. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Test.