2020 | 20 | 5 | 125-146
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
This study aims to show the effect of individual SMS-based academic vocabulary reporting activities on EAP learners’ general academic vocabulary learning and attitudes. An experimental design was employed for this purpose. A total of 60 EAP students were randomly assigned to three different cohorts, consisting of 20 students each. The three different cohorts received 120 academic words and reported their meaning and definition in Indonesian (AVRI), in English (AVRE), and in both Indonesian and English (AVRIE). Then, a general academic vocabulary test (GAVT) was administered to assess their academic vocabulary acquisition. The findings indicate that learning English academic vocabulary applying mixed languages revealed higher vocabulary scores gains than the other two groups because the double representations of the meanings strengthen their comprehension and acquisition. Learners also show positive attitudes toward the implementation of SMS-based reporting activities as they can select their vocabulary more freely to suit their learning needs.
Physical description
  • Al-Jarf, R. (2012). Mobile technology and student autonomy in oral skill acquisition. In J. E. Diaz-Vera (ed.), Left to My Own Devices: Learner Autonomy and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 105-130). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Al-Shehri, S. (2011). Mobile social networking in language learning: A transformational tool. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 5(3/4), 345-359.
  • Alamri, K., & Rogers, V. (2018). The effectiveness of different explicit vocabulary-teaching strategies on learners’ retention of technical and academic words. Language Learning Journal, 46(5), 622-633.
  • Alemi, M., Sarab, M. R. A., & Lari, Z. (2012). Successful learning of academic word list via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6), 99-109.
  • Ally, M., Schafer, S., Cheung, B., McGreal, R., & Tin, T. (2007). Use of mobile learning technology to train ESL adults. Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Learning, 1-8. Melbourne, Australia: Citeseer.
  • Amiryousefi, M. (2015). Iranian EFL learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about the usefulness of vocabulary learning strategies. SAGE Open, 5(2), 1-10.
  • Arifani, Y. (2019). The application of small group and individual flipped model with WhatsApp to foster EFL learners’ cohesive writing skill. Library Hi Tech News, 36(4), 10-12.
  • Arifani, Y., Asari, S., Anwar, K., & Budianto, L. (2020). Individual or collaborative Whatsapp learning? A flipped classroom model of EFL writing instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 20(1), 122-139.
  • Atai, M. R., & Dashtestani, R. (2013). Iranian English for academic purposes (EAP) stakeholders’ attitudes toward using the Internet in EAP courses for civil engineering students: promises and challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 21-38.
  • Baleghizadeh, S., & Oladrostam, E. (2010). The effect of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) on the grammatical accuracy of EFL students. MEXTESOL Journal, 34(2), 1-10.
  • Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 381-401.
  • Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m‐Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78-91.
  • Chen, C. M., Chen, L. C., & Yang, S. M. (2019). An English vocabulary learning app with self-regulated learning mechanism to improve learning performance and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 237-260.
  • Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2010). Personalized context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4), 341-364.
  • Chen, N.-S., Hsieh, S.-W., & Kinshuk (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 93-113.
  • Coxhead, A. (2012). Academic vocabulary, writing, and English for Academic purposes: Perspectives from second language learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 137-145.
  • Dashtestani, R. (2015). Examining the use of web-based tests for testing academic vocabulary in EAP instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 15(1), 48-61.
  • Dashtestani, R., & Stojković, N. (2015). The effect of SMS-based L1 and L2 glosses on EAP students’ academic vocabulary learning and attitudes. The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 3(3), 521-537.
  • Derakhshan, A., & Kaivanpanah, S. (2011). The impact of text-messaging on EFL freshmen’s vocabulary learning. European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 39(19), 47-56.
  • Dhanavel, S. P. (2015). Understanding the attitude of ESL learners to vocabulary learning. Calidoscopio, 13(2), 218-226.
  • Feng, Y., & Webb, S. (2019). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening, and viewing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 1-25.
  • Garcia, T. (1996). Self-regulation: An introduction. Learning and Individual Differences, 3(8), 161-163.
  • Ha, A. Y. H., & Hyland, K. (2017). What is technicality? A Technicality Analysis Model for EAP vocabulary. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 28(July), 35-49.
  • Hayati, A., Jalilifar, A., & Mashhadi, A. (2013). Using Short Message Service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 66-81.
  • Karakas, A., & Sariçoban, A. (2012). The impact of watching subtitled animated cartoons on incidental vocabulary learning of ELT students. Teaching English with Technology, 12(4), 3-15.
  • Kauffman, D. F., Zhao, R., & Yang, Y.-S. (2011). Effects of online note-taking formats and self-monitoring prompt on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 313-322.
  • Kim, W., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2013). The effects of self-regulation on science vocabulary acquisition of English language learners with learning difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 34(4), 225-236.
  • Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students’ self-regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 235-252.
  • Krajka, J. (2006). Teaching listening comprehension with web-based video. The Teacher, 5(39), 8-16.
  • Krajka, J. (2019). Electronic appearances in TEIL instruction – Expanding intercultural teacher training with telecollaborative activities. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 67(10), 65-81.
  • Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322.
  • Lee, H. C. (2014). Social media and student learning behavior: Plugging into mainstream music offers dynamic ways to learn English. Computers in Human Behavior, 36(July), 496-501.
  • Li, J., & Cummins, J. (2019). Effect of using texting on vocabulary instruction for English learners. Language Learning and Technology, 23(2), 43-64.
  • Li, J., Cummins, J., & Deng, Q. (2017). The effectiveness of texting to enhance academic vocabulary learning: English language learners’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 816-843.
  • Li, J., & Deng, Q. (2018). What influences the effect of texting-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition? Learners’ behavior and perception. Computers and Education, 125(October), 284-307.
  • Lin, C. C., & Yu, Y. C. (2017). Effects of presentation modes on mobile-assisted vocabulary learning and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 528-542.
  • Lin, J. J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878-919.
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • McKeown, M. G., Crosson, A. C., Moore, D. W., & Beck, I. L. (2018). Word knowledge and comprehension effects of an academic vocabulary intervention for middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 55(3), 572-616.
  • Mulder, E., Van De Ven, M., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). Context, word, and student predictors in second language vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 137-166.
  • Newton, J. (2013). Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 17(2), 164-187.
  • Ou-Yang, F. C., & Wu, W. C. V. (2017). Using mixed-modality vocabulary learning on mobile devices: Design and evaluation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1043-1069.
  • Pavicic Takac, V. (2008). Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Foreign Language Acquisition. Frankfurt: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Pecorari, D., Shaw, P., & Malmström, H. (2019). Developing a new academic vocabulary test. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 59-71.
  • Petersen, S. A., & Markiewicz, J.-K. (2008). PALLAS: Personalized language learning on mobile devices. Fifth IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (Wmute 2008), 1, 52-59. Beijing, China: IEEE.
  • Sakata, N. (2019). Profiling vocabulary for proficiency development: Effects of input and general frequencies on L2 learning. System, 87(December), 1-12.
  • Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2014). A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484-503.
  • Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. Proceedings of MLearn, 1(1), 1-9.
  • Song, Y. (2008). SMS enhanced vocabulary learning for mobile audiences. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(1), 81-98.
  • Suwantarathip, O., & Orawiwatnakul, W. (2015). Using mobile-assisted exercises to support students’ vocabulary skill development. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(1), 163-171.
  • Tseng, W. T., Liou, H. J., & Chu, H. C. (2020). Vocabulary learning in virtual environments: Learner autonomy and collaboration. System, 88(1), 1-17.
  • Uz Bilgin, C., & Tokel, S. T. (2019). Facilitating contextual vocabulary learning in a mobile-supported situated learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(4), 930-953.
  • Walters, J. D., & Bozkurt, N. (2009). The effect of keeping vocabulary notebooks on vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 403-423.
  • Warschauer, M. (2011). Emerging technologies for autonomous language learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(3), 107-118.
  • XU, Q. (2016). A brief study on English autonomous learning ability based on mobile learning in EFL curriculum. Canadian Social Science, 12(11), 114-118.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Self-regulatory dimensions of academic learning and motivation. In G. D. Phye (ed.), Handbook of Academic Learning (pp. 105-125). London: Elsevier.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.