2016 | 4 | 201 - 211
Article title

Rater perceptions in tests of oral expression

Title variants
Percepcje oceny w testowanych wypowiedziach ustnych
Languages of publication
Systemy oceniania języka mówionego posługują się rozmaitymi skalami zawierającymi różne kategorie odnoszące się do jakości języka zawierające podkategorie obejmujące słownictwo i środki językowe, jak również poprawność językową zwykle na tle biegłości i potoczystości w mówieniu. Te, z kolei, uzupełnione bywają rozlicznymi jeszcze kategoriami, wśród których właściwie zawsze poczesne miejsce zajmuje wymowa. Warto jednak przyjrzeć się sytuacji, gdzie tej kategorii brak w skalach oceniania i w jaki sposób wpływa to na percepcje egzaminatorów języka mówionego. W tym badaniu dane pochodzące z Elektroniczne Systemu Wspierania Oceniania (ang. EPSS) zgromadzone w trakcie treningu i doszkalania egzaminatorów języka angielskiego z różnych kontekstów edukacyjnych pozwalają na sformułowanie intrygujących wniosków badawczych
Assessment of spoken performance is often viewed in terms of various different categories relating to the language aspect of performance including provisions for vocabulary use and linguistic resources, as well as accuracy of use, contrasted with fluency. Such categories are often coupled with several other categories relating to other aspects of spoken performance, and amongst those one almost always featured in rating schemes is that of pronunciation. It is interesting to observe what happens when this category is omitted in rating scales and how this affects the perceptions of oral examiners. In this investigation, data from an Electronic Performance Support System (EPSS) obtained in training and fine-tuning examiners of oral performance in tests of spoken performance in English from different educational contexts is used to draw some intriguing research conclusions
201 - 211
Physical description
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Płocku
  • Bachman L.F., and Palmer, A. 2002. Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: University Press
  • Barna M.L. 1994. Stumbling Blocks in Intercultural Communication. In Intercultural Communication, eds. L.A. Samovar and R.E. Porter. Wadsworth
  • Bennet M.J. 1993. Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. In Education for the Intercultural Experience. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press
  • Bond T.G., and Fox, C.M. 2007. Applying the Rasch Model. Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Toledo: University of Toledo Press
  • Brown A., 2006. “An examination of the rating process in the revised IELTS Speaking Test”. IELTS Research Reports Volume 6, IELTS Australia, Canberra and British Council, London
  • Cavé C., Guaïtella I., and Santi S. 2002. “Eyebrow movements and voice variations in dialogue situations”. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processinig, eds. Hansen, J.H.L and Pellom, B.
  • Chambers L., Ingham K. 2011. “The BULATS Online SpeakingTest”. ESOL Research Notes, vol 34
  • De Velle S. 2008. “The revised IELTS Pronunciation scale”. ESOL Research Notes, vol 34
  • Fulcher G. 2003. Testing Second Language Speaking. Harlow: Pearson Longman
  • Guaïtella I., Santi S., Lagrue B., Cavé Ch. 2009. “Are Eyebrow Movements Linked to Voice Variations and Turn-taking in Dialogue? An Experimental Investigation”. Language and Speech 57
  • Hall E., and Hall M. 1990. Understanding cultural differences: Germans, French and Americans. Verlag: Intercultural Press
  • Hall E. 1959. The silent language. Garden City: Doubleday
  • Hall E. 1966. The hidden dimension. Garden Day: Doubleday Anchor Books
  • Hawkey R. 2004. “A Modular Approach to Testing English Language Skills: The development of the Certificates in English Language Skills, CELS, examinations”. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes Volume 16
  • Hildreth P.M. and Kimble Ch. 2004. Knowledge networks: innovation through communities of practice. Idea Group Inc
  • Hubbard C., Gilbert S. and Pidcock J. 2006. “Assessment processes in speaking tests: a pilot verbal protocol study”. ESOL Research Notes, vol 24
  • Hubbard Ch. 2011. “Cambridge ESOL Professional Support Network Extranet: Development and impact”. ESOL Research Notes, vol 49
  • Hymes D. 1964. Introduction: “Toward Ethnographies of Communication”. American Anthropologist 66, 6
  • Hymes D. 1972. On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics, eds J. B. Pride and J. Holmes. Harmondsworth: Penguin
  • Krahmer E. and Swerts M. 2004. More about brows. In From brows to trust: Evaluating embodied conversational agents, eds. Ruttkay, Z. and Pelachaud, C., Norwell: Kluwer Academic Press
  • Krakowian P. 2010. Modern Test Theory Explained. Warszawa: Scholar
  • Krakowian P. 2011. Investigating Rater Performance in Tests of Oral Expression. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
  • Lustig M.W. and Koester J. 1993. Intercultural Competence. Interpersonal Communication across Cultures. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers
  • Lustig M.W. and Koester J. 2009. Intercultural Competence: Interpersonal Communication Across Cultures. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
  • Martinez L. 2009. “How Examiners of Different Severity Grade Candidates of Different Ability”. Test Insights 2009. Measurement Research Associates, Inc
  • Martinez L. 2010. “The Relationship between Examiner Severity and Consistency”. Test Insights 2010. Measurement Research Associates, Inc
  • Nakane I. 2007. Silence in Intercultural Communication: perceptions and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  • O’Sullivan B. 2008. Modelling Performance in Tests of Spoken Language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang
  • Ockey G. J. 2009. “The effects of group members’ personalities on a test taker’s L2 group oral discussion test scores”. Language Testing, 26
  • Orr M. 2002. “The FCE Speaking test: using rater reports to help interpret test scores”. System, vol 30, no 2
  • Saint-Onge H. and Wallace D. 2003. Leveraging communities of practice for strategic advantage. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
  • Scollon R. and Scollon S.W. 1995. Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell
  • Seed G. 2012. “Perceptions of authenticity in academic test tasks”. ESOL Research Notes, vol 49
  • Seiter J., Weger H., Jensen A. and Kinzer H. 2010. “The Role of Background Behavior in Televised Debates: Does Displaying Nonverbal Agreement and/or Disagreement Benefit Either Debater?” Journal of Social Psychology Vol. 150, No. 3
  • Taylor L., and Falvey, P. 2007. “IELTS Collected Papers: Research in speaking and writing assessment”. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes Volume 19
  • Tynan R. 2015. “Creating ePortfolios to facilitate and evidence progress using learning technologies”. Cambridge Exams Research Notes, vol 61
  • Weir C. and Milanovic M. 2003. “Continuity and Innovation: Revising the Cambridge Proficiency in English Examination 1913-2002”. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes issue 15
  • Wenger E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Wenger E., McDermott R.A. and Snyder W. 2002, Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Harvard: Business Press
  • Wilson M. 2005. Constructing Measures: An Item Response Model, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • Wright B.D. and Masters G. 1982. Rating Scale Analysis. San Diego: MESA Press
  • Wright B.D. and Stone M.H. 1979. Best test design. San Diego: MESA Press
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.