Modelowanie uwarunkowań sukcesu przedsiębiorstw zorientowanych projektowo

• Authors: Hofman Mariusz

Title variants

EN

Theoretical framework for value creation in project oriented companies

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Artykuł ma na celu zaprezentowanie teoretycznego modelu opisującego sposób działania przedsiębiorstw zorientowanych projektowo oraz jego zasad jego operacjonalizacji. W artykule zaprezentowana została również metoda badawcza, która za pomocą procedur matematycznych i statystycznych pozwla zbadać, czy model taki znajduje swe potwierdzenie w zebranych danych empirycznych. Potwierdzenie przypuszczeń teoretycznych da możliwość określenia nowej ścieżki rozwoju dla przedsiębiorstw zorientowanych projektowo. Pozwoli ona takim organizacjom efektywnie funkcjonować w warunkach narastającej konkurencji oraz presji innowacyjnej.

EN

The purpose of the paper is to present hypothetical and deductive model describing the modus operandi of project oriented companies (POC’s) and approach to model operationalisation. Due to this statistical procedure, it will be verified whether the matrix arising from the adopted theoretical model differs statistically from the empirical matrix of covariance arising from the system of equations. The fit of the model with the empirical data will be evaluated using χ2, RMSEA and CFI (Comparative Fit Index). How well the theoretical model fits the empirical data is assessed through a number of indicators.

Keywords

PL

kreowanie wartości; przedsiębiorstwa zorientowane projektowo; modelowanie równań strukturalnych

EN

value creation; project oriented company; structural equation modelling

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Rzeszowski. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
• Journal: Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 53
• Pages: 139-149

Contributors

author

Hofman Mariusz

• Katedra Zarządzania Jakością i Wiedzą, Wydział Ekonomiczny UMCS w Lublinie

References

• Anavi-Isakow S., Golany B., 2003, Managing multi-project environments through constant work-in-process, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 21 (1), http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00058-8.
• Bellini E., Canonico, P., 2008, Knowing communities in project driven organizations: Analysing the strategic impact of socially constructed HRM practices, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 26 (1).
• Beringer C., Jonas D., Gemünden H., 2012, Establishing Project Portfolio Management: An Exploratory Analysis of the Influence of Internal Stakeholders’ Interactions, „Project Management Journal”, Vol. 43 (6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21307.
• Beringer C., Jonas D., Kock A., 2013, Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 31 (6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.006.
• Blichfeldt B., Eskerod P., 2008, Project portfolio management – there’s more to it than what management enacts, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 26 (4).
• Blomquist T., Müller R., 2006, Practices, roles, and responsibilities of middle managers in program and portfolio management, „Project Management Journal”, Vol. 37 (1).
• Bollen, K., 1989, With new incremental structural index for general equation models made, „Sociological Methods and Research”, Vol. 17 (3), 1989.
• Bonnet D., Wright T., 2015, Cronbach’s alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, Vol. 36 (1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.1960.
• Bourgeon L., 2007, Staffing approach and conditions for collective learning in project teams: the case of new product development projects, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 25 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.014.
• Brown T.A., 2006, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, The Guilford Press, New York, London.
• Clarkson M., 1995, A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 20 (1), http://dx.doi. org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271994.
• Cooper R., Edgett S., Kleinschidit E., 2002, New problems, New solutions. Making portfolio management more effectiwe [w:] J. Pennypacker, L. Dye (eds.), Managing multiple projects, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York–Basel.
• Cronbach J., 1951, Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, „Psychometrika”, Vol. 16 (3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.
• De Carvalho J., Chima F., 2014, Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Social Sciences Research, „American International Journal of Contemporary Research”, Vol. 4 (1), 2014.
• Desouza K., Evaristo J., 2006, Project management offices. A case of knowledge-based archetyps, „International Journal of Information Management”, Vol. 26 (5).
• Dillard J., Nissen M., 2007, Computational modeling of project organizations under stress, „Project Management Journal”, Vol. 38 (1).
• Donaldson T., Preston L. (1995), The stakeholder theory of the corporation. Concepts, evidence, and implications, „Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 20 (1), http:// dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781442673496-011.
• Eriksson P., 2013, Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 31 (3), http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.07.005.
• Gareis R., 1991, Management by projects: the management strategy of the ‘new’ project- -oriented company, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 9 (2), http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(91)90062-Z.
• Gareis R., 2004, Management of the Project Oriented Company [w:] The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects, red. P. Morris, J. Pinto, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New York, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470172391.ch6.
• Gareis R., 2010, Changes of organizations by projects, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 28 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.002.
• Gutiérrez E., Magnusson M., 2014, Dealing with legitimacy: A key challenge for Project Portfolio Management decision makers, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 32 (1).
• Hofman M., 2014, Models of PMO functioning in a multi-project environment, „Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences”, Vol. 119 (3).
• Huemann M., 2010, Considering Human Resource Management when developing a project- -oriented company: Case study of a telecommunication company, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 28 (4).
• Jonas D., 2010, Empowering project portfolio managers. How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 28 (8), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.002.
• Koskinen K., 2012, Organizational Learning in Project-Based Companies: A Process Thinking Approach, „Project Management Journal”, Vol. 43 (3), http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/pmj.21266.
• Laslo Z., 2010, Project portfolio management: An integrated method for resource planning and scheduling to minimize planning/scheduling – dependent expenses, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 28 (6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijproman.2009.10.001.
• Lock D., 2000, Project Management, Gower Publishing, Aldershot.
• Lycett M., Rassau A., Danson J., 2004, Programme management: A critical review, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 22 (4), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijproman.2003.06.001.
• Martinsuo M., 2013, Project portfolio management in practice and in context, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 31 (6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman. 2012.10.013.
• Meskendahl S., 2010, The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success – A conceptual framework, „International Journal of Project Management”, vol. 28 (8), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.007.
• Müller R., Glückler J., Aubry M., Shao J., 2013, Project Management Knowledge Flows in Networks of Project Managers and Project Management Offices: A Case Stud in the Pharmaceutical Industry, „Project Management Journal”, Vol. 44 (2), http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21326.
• Nonaka I., Peltokorpi V., 2006, Objectivity and Subjectivity in Knowledge Management: A Review of 20 Top Articles, „Knowledge and Process Management”, Vol. 13 (2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/kpm.251.
• Payne H., 1995, Management of multiple simultaneous projects. A state-of-the-art review, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 13 (3), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263- 7863(94)00019-9.
• Pender S., 2001, Managing incomplete knowledge. Why risk management is not sufficient, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 19 (2).
• Pennypacker J., Dye L., 2002, Portfolio management and managing multiple projects [w:] J. Pennypacker, L. Dye (eds.), Managing multiple projects, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York–Basel.
• Reich H., Gemino A., Sauer, C., 2008, Modeling the knowledge perspective, „Project Management Journal”, Vol. 39 (S1).
• Skrzypek E., Hofman M., 2007, Knowledge and intellectual capital management in Project Oriented Enterprises, Papers 21’th IPMA World Congress of Project Management, Cracow.
• Teller J., 2013, Portfolio Risk Management and Its Contribution to Project Portfolio Success: An Investigation of Organization, Process and Culture, „Project Management Journal”, Vol. 44 (2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21327.
• Thiry M., Deguire M., 2007, Recent developments in project-based organisations, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 25 (7), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijproman.2007.02.001.
• Voss M., Kock A., 2013, Impact of relationship value on project portfolio success – Investigating the moderating effects of portfolio characteristics and external turbulence, „International Journal of Project Management”, Vol. 31 (6), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijproman.2012.11.005.
• Westland Ch., 2010, Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling, „Electronic Commerce Research and Applications”, Vol. 9 (6).
• Whitley R., 2006, Project-Based Firms: New Organizational Form or Variations on Theme?, „Industrial and Corporate Change”, Vol. 15 (1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ cc/dtj003.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15584/nsawg.2018.1.11