The Aristotelian Criticism of the Liberal Foundations of Modern State

• Authors: Gajek Marcin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The paper discusses some fundamental differences between Aristotelian and modern conceptions of the state. It focuses its attention on the early liberal thinkers, such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, and contrasts the theory of state developed by them with the classical republican ideal described by Aristotle. As I will demonstrate main differences come down to (1) distinct ideas concerning the state’s origins (and especially human motivations behind establishing the state), (2) divergent convictions about the role of the state and its ethical dimension; and finally (3) different beliefs concerning basic feelings and passions which sustain existence of political community. I argue that on the basis of Stagirite’s philosophy it is possible to question whether civic association described by the precursors of liberal political thought is actually the state. In conclusion, I signalize the problem of serious limitations of contemporary liberal democracies (or even their internal contradictions) resulting from their attempt to follow an ideal of an ideologically neutral state.

Keywords

EN

state; Aristotle; Thomas Hobbes; John Locke; liberalism; republicanism

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: Polish Political Science Yearbook
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 45
• Pages: 272–287

Contributors

author

Gajek Marcin

• Collegium Civitas in Warsaw

References

• Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Arendt, H. (2005). The promise of politics. (J. Kohn, Ed.) (1st ed). New York: Schocken Books.
• Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean ethics. (W. D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
• Aristotle. (2013). Politics. (C. Lord, Trans.) (Second edition). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
• Berkowitz, P. (1999). Virtue and the making of modern liberalism. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
• Bielik–Robson, A. (2010, April 16). Polski triumf Tanatosa. Krytyka Polityczna. Retrieved July 23, 2016, from http://krytykapolityczna.salon24.pl/171485,bielik–robson–polski–triumf–tanatosa
• Burke, E. (1999). Reflections on the revolution in France. In Selected works of Edmund Burke (Vol. 2). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
• Cicero, M. T. (1841). The treatise on the commonwealth. In F. Barham (Trans.), The political works of Marcus Tullius Cicero (Vol. 1). London: Edmund Spettigue.
• Cicero, M. T. (1842). The treatise on the laws. In F. Barham (Trans.), The political works of Marcus Tullius Cicero (Vol. 2). London: Edmund Spettigue.
• Gajek, M. (2016). W stronę republikańskiego liberalizmu. Kategoria cnót liberalnych we współczesnej amerykańskiej myśli politycznej. Kraków – Warszawa: Ośrodek Myśli Politycznej – Collegium Civitas.
• Galston, W. A. (1991). Liberal purposes: goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state. Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Gray, J. (1994). Liberalizm. Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak?: Fundacja im. Sefana Batorego.
• Hobbes, T. (1965). Leviathan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Kubiak, Z. (2003). Literatura Greków i Rzymian. Warszawa: Świat Książki.
• Locke, J. (1824). Two Treatises of Government. In The Works of John Locke in Nine Volumes (Vol. 4). London: Printed for C. and J. Rinington, etc.
• Łojek, S. (2009). Megalopsychokracja. O cnocie w polityce i polityce cnoty (od Homera do Arendt i Straussa). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
• Macedo, S. (1991). Liberal virtues: citizenship, virtue, and community in liberal constitutionalism. Oxford – New York: Clarendon Press – Oxford University Press.
• Macedo, S. (1992). Charting Liberal Virtues. In J. W. Chapman & W. A. Galston (Eds.), Virtue (pp. 204–232). New York: New York University Press.
• Macpherson, C. B. (2011). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Don Mills (Ontario): Oxford University Press.
• Montesquieu, C. de S. (2006). The spirit of the laws. (A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller, & H. S. Stone, Trans.). Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Oakeshott, M. (1975). Hobbes on civil association. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Plato. (1991). The Republic. (A. Bloom, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
• Po co nam grecka filozofia polityki albo o cnocie doskonałości. (2008). Kronos, (2).
• Rau, Z. (2000). Liberalizm: zarys myśli politycznej XIX i XX wieku. Warszawa: Fundacja Aletheia.
• Shklar, J. N. (1998). Liberalism of fear. In S. Hoffmann (Ed.), Political thought and political thinkers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Strauss, L. (1965). On the spirit of Hobbes’ political philosophy. In K. C. Brown (Ed.), Hobbes studies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Strauss, L. (1969). Prawo naturalne w świetle historii. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Pax.
• Williams, H. (1997). Kant on Virtue (Tugend). Individual and Civic Virtue in Kant. In R. Piekarski (Ed.), Cnoty polityczne – dawniej i obecnie: moralne źródła polityki. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/ppsy2016021