2016 | 2 | 11-126
Article title

Ekonomia polityczna procesów prywatyzacyjnych w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej – próba podsumowania

Title variants
Political Economy of the Privatisation Processes in Central and Eastern Europe – Summarising Attempt
Languages of publication
The objective of the paper is to investigate selected elements of the privtisation processes in Central and Eastern Europe. This vital part of economic policy played – in the transformation phase – a key role in shaping the new socio-economic order as well as it brought about a number of important implications (valid up to the present) in many spheres of life. Shifting from the centrally planned state economy to the free-market one based on the private property took place in CEE in the „heat” of neoliberal ideology. In this critical moment one could observe a redefinition of the relations between the market and the state, shifting the gravity point towards the more liberal solutions and the domination of market efficiency logic over the logic of the so called „public good”. Controversies over the methods, mechanisms and consequences (direct and indirect) of privatisation, especially the social ones, require advanced academic reflection.
Physical description
  • Balcerowicz Leszek, Trzeba się bić. Opowieść biograficzna, Warszawa 2014.
  • Beveridge Ross, Naumann Matthias, Global Norms, Local Contestation: Privatisation and De-politicisation in Berlin, „Policy and Politics”, Vol. 42, No. 2/2014, s. 275–291.
  • Bortolotti Bernardo, Fantini Marcella, Siniscalco Domenico, Privatisation Around the World: Evidence from Panel Data, „Journal of Public Economics”, Vol. 88(1–2)2003, s. 305–332.
  • Davidson Sinclair, Why is privatisation so controversial?, „Policy”, Vol. 30, No. 1, Autumn 2014, s. 18–22.
  • Katrougalos George, Constitutional Limitations of Privatisation in the USA and Europe: A Theoretical and Comparative Perspective, „Constelations”, Vol. 17, No. 3/2010, s. 407–425.
  • La Porta Rafael, Lopez-de-Sileanes Florencio, Sheifer Andrei, Government Ownership of Banks, „The Journal of Finance”, Vol. 57(1)2002, s. 265–301.
  • Pejovich Svetozar, On the Privation of „Stolen Goods” in Central and Eastern Europe, „The Indpendent Review”, Vol. X, No. 2, Fall 2005, s. 209–229.
  • Illimar Ploom, Towards Neoliberal Imperialism? Discussing the Implications of the New European Governance Emerging from the Fiscal Crisis and Administrative Reforms for the Identity of the EU, “Administrative Culture”, Vol. 15(1)/2014, s. 21–38.
  • Reiners Marcus, International Liberalisation Policy. Political Scientifi c Factors Impacing the Proces of Denationalisation, „Journal of Comparative Politics”, Vol. 6, No. 2/2013, s. 63–81.
  • Riedel Rafał, Tranzytologia i konsolidologia – czyli jak zbadać poziom zaawansowania demokratyzacji systemu politycznego, „Przegląd Politologiczny”, nr 1/2008, s. 19–36.
  • Riedel Rafał, Demokratyczna bańka spekulacyjna… czy młode demokracje przetrwają kryzys gospodarczy? Refleksje na temat relacji demokracja – kapitalizm, w: Rada Europy a przemiany demokratyczne w państwach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej w latach 1989–2009, red. J. Jaskiernia, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Toruń 2010, s. 706–717.
  • Rohac Dabor, Economic Transitions: Learning from Central Europe, „Policy Review”, October/November 2012, s. 69–79.
  • Scott Thomas, The Politics and Economics of Privatisation in Central and Eastern Europe, „The Columbia Journal of World Business”, Spring 1993, s. 168–178.
  • Grant Simon, Quiggin John, Public Investment and the Risk of Premium for Euity, „Economica”, No. 70(277)/2003.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.