PL EN


2008 | 1(1) | 59-79
Article title

Antitrust Private Enforcement – Case of Poland

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
This article presents the main difficulties surrounding private enforcement of antitrust law in Poland, currently the key implementation problem in the field of antitrust law. Whereas the basic standards concerning the public pillar of antitrust enforcement have already been established, either in the European Community (EC) or in its Member States, the private pillar of antitrust enforcement has not yet been fully developed. The fact that private enforcement of antitrust law is possible, and in fact equal, to public enforcement is not yet commonly recognized. In response to the European Commission’s White Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, private enforcement of antirust law is presently under intense discussion in EC Member States. This article should be considered as one of the contributions to this debate. It presents the main legal framework of private enforcement of antitrust law in Poland. In order to do so, it directly refers to the Polish Act on competition and consumer protection, the Civil Code and the Civil Procedure Code. This article also discusses Polish case law in this area. It aims to assess whether existing Polish legal provisions are, in fact, sufficient to ensure effective private enforcement of Polish as well as EC antitrust law. The article refers to the main proposals of the European Commission’s White Paper. It is concluded that private enforcement of antitrust law is indeed possible in Poland on the basis of currently applicable procedural rules, even if there are no special instruments designed to facilitate it. However, it cannot be expect that in the current legal climate, private parties will eagerly and frequently apply for damages in cases of a breach of Polish antitrust law. Antitrust cases are special in many aspects and, thus, they require specific solutions in procedural terms. This article aims to pinpoint those areas, where the Polish law needs to be changed in order to develop and promote private enforcement of antitrust law in Poland.
Year
Volume
Pages
59-79
Physical description
Dates
published
2008-12-01
Contributors
  • Department of European Economic Law, Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw
References
  • Basedow J. (ed.), Private Enforcement of EC Competition Law, Kluwer Law International 2007.
  • Bernatt M., “Postępowanie przed sądem krajowym w związku z naruszeniem reguł konkurencji” [“Proceeding before a national court relating to an infringement of competition rules”] [in:] E. Piontek (ed.), Nowe tendencje w prawie konkurencji UE [New tendencies in the EU competition law], Warszawa 2008.
  • Będkowski-Kozioł M., “Prywatne wdrażanie prawa antymonopolowego w RFN – uwagi na tle regulacji siódmej noweli kartelowej” [“Private enforcement of antitrust law in the Federal Republic of Germany – comments on the basis of the seventh cartel amendment”] (2007) 12 Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego.
  • Carpagnano M., “Private enforcement of Competition Law Arrives in Italy: Analysis of the Judgment of the European Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-295-298/04 Manfredi” (2006) 3(1) Competition Law Review.
  • De Smijter E., Stropp C., Woods D., “Green Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules” (2006) 1 EC Competition Policy Newsletter.
  • Green Paper. An Optimal View of the Civil Code of the Republic of Poland (ed. Z. Radwański), Ministry of Justice, Warszawa 2006.
  • Jurkowska A., “Perspektywy prywatnego wdrażania prawa ochrony konkurencji w Polsce na tle doświadczeń Wspólnoty Europejskiej” [“Prospects of private enforcement of competition law in Poland from the perspective of the European Community’s experiences”] (2008) 1 Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego.
  • Jurkowska A., Skoczny T. (eds), Orzecznictwo sądów wspólnotowych w sprawach konkurencji w latach 1964–2004 [Case law of the EC courts in competition cases in 1964–2004], Warszawa 2007.
  • Jurkowska A., Prywatnoprawne wdrażanie wspólnotowego prawa konkurencji [Private enforcement of competition law], Centrum Europejskie Natolin – EUI Research Laboratory, Zeszyt 19 (available: http://www.natolin.edu.pl/pdf/zeszyty/Natolin_Zeszty_19.pdf)
  • Jurkowska A., Miąsik D., Skoczny T., Szydło M., “Nowa uokik z 2007 r. – kolejny krok w kierunku doskonalenia publicznoprawnej ochrony konkurencji w Polsce” [“New Act on Competition and Consumer Protection – a Further Step to Improve the Basis of Public Protection of Competition in Poland”] (2007) 4 Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego.
  • Kohutek K., Sieradzka M., Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2008.
  • Ławicki T., “Glosa do wyroku SN z dnia 22 lutego 1994 r., I CRN 238/93” [“Case comment to a judgment of the Supreme Court of 22 February 1994”], (1995) 7 Państwo i Prawo.
  • Miąsik D., “Zasada pierwszeństwa prawa wspólnotowego przed prawem krajowym –wprowadzenie i wyrok ETS z 29.09.2001 r. w sprawie C-453/99 Courage Ltd. przeciwko Bernard Crehan oraz Bernard Crehan przeciwko Courage Ltd. i in.” [“Rule of the supremacy of the Community law over a national law and a judgment of the ECJ of 29 September 2001 Courage Ltd. V. Bernard Crehan and Bernard Crehan v. Courage Ltd. i in.”] (2006) 2 Europejski Przegląd Sądowy.
  • Modzelewska-Wąchal E., Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów. Komentarz [Act on Competition and Consumer Protection. Commentary], Warszawa 2002.
  • Podrecki P., Porozumienia monopolistyczne i ich cywilnoprawne skutki [Monopolistic agreements and their civil effects], Krakow 2000.
  • Szanciło T.,“Porozumienia ograniczające konkurencję” [“Competition restricting agreements”] (2006) 6 Przegląd Prawa Handlowego.
  • Szanciło T., “Prekluzja w postępowaniu gospodarczym” [“Preclusion in court proceedings in business-related cases”] (2007) 6 Przegląd Prawa Handlowego.
  • Szpunar M., Odpowiedzialność podmiotu prywatnego z tytułu naruszenia prawa wspólnotowego [Liability of private entities for a breach of EC law], a Wolters Kluwer business, Warszawa 2008.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-ad6f09b5-7942-4a51-841b-8ee2a01de78d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.