Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2013 | 4 (51) |

Article title

MOOCs, Ethics and the Economics of Higher Education

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The starting point for article is the question: Is there something in that exchange between a single caring professor and motivated student that, while impossible to assess, measure or digitize, is at the very heart of what a university tries to be? The authors discuss the concept of Massively Open Online Classes in the context of Gartner Hype Cycle and explore MOOC ethical implications. The aim of this short article is, according to the authors, not to support or oppose the deployment of MOOCs but to clarify certain ethical presuppositions.

Journal

Year

Issue

Physical description

Contributors

References

  • G. Anscomb, Intention, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA 2000.
  • A. Austin, Assessment for Excellence, Jossey Bass, Hoboken NJ 1991.
  • M. Barber, K. Donnelly, S. Rizvi, An Avalanche is Coming, Higher Education and Revolution Ahead, Institute for Policy Research, London 2013.
  • D. Bok, Our Underachieving Colleges, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ 2007.
  • M. Bousquet, How the University Works, New York University Press, New York 2008.
  • D. Breneman, S. Nelson, Financing Community Colleges, Brookings Institute, Washington DC 1981.
  • P. Brown, H. Lauder, D. Ashton, The Global Auction, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2012.
  • C. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge MA 1997.
  • D. Cormier, Attention les MOOC!?! Mois de la pedagogie universaitaire, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAVwQ7RJWqg.
  • J. Fenn, M. Rasking, Mastering the Hype Cycle, Harvard Business School, Cambridge MA 2008.
  • A. Flew, The Profit Motive, „Ethics” 1976, Vol. 86, No. 4.
  • S. Kolowich, The Professors Who Make the MOOCS, „Chronicle of Higher Education” 2013, Vol. 3, No. 21.
  • S. Kolowich, Why Some Colleges Are Saying No to MOOC Deals, At Least for Now, „Chronicle of Higher Education”, http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Some-Colleges-Are-Saying/138863/.
  • D. Kurtzleben, Three Ways MOOCs Will Change Colleges, US News and World Report, 2013.
  • T. Lewin, Professors At San Jose State Criticize Online Courses, „New York Times”, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/education/san-jose-state-philosophy-dept-criticizes-online-courses.html?_r=0.
  • F. McCluskey, M. Winter, The Idea of the Digital University, Westphalia Press, Washington DC 2012.
  • J.S. Mill, J. Bentham, Utilitarianism and Other Essays, Penguin Classics, London 1987.
  • C. Nelson, Will Teach for Food: Academic Labor in Crisis, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis 1997.
  • J. Newman, The Idea of A University, Notre Dame University Press, South Bend IN 1982.
  • J. Rachels, S. Rachels, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, McGraw Hill Publishers, New York 2011.
  • N. Sonwalkar, Desktop Learning in 21st Century and Beyond, „The MIT Report” 1998, Vol. XXVI, No. 6.
  • V. Strauss, Are MOOCs hyped?, „The Washington Post”, 23.11.2012.
  • G. Teschner, F. McCluskey, Hypertext and Semiotics, Proceedings of the Conference on Technology and Education, George Mason University Press, Washington DC 1990.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-ad88ca6d-b019-4a40-b1c2-e6696daa077f
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.