KTO WIE LEPIEJ, CZYLI RZECZ O RÓŻNYCH PODEJŚCIACH DO PARTYCYPACJI

• Authors: Prośniewski Błażej

Title variants

EN

WHO KNOWS BETTER: DIFFERENT APPROACHES TOWARDS PARTICIPATION

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

WHO KNOWS BETTER: DIFFERENT APPROACHES TOWARDS PARTICIPATION The main aim of this article is to show how architects, authorities and citydwellers consider participation in a range of widely understood city space, how they use this space and enforce their rights to it and why participants should have to professionalize their work, which was one of the main stimulants of the birth of urban movements in Poland. Prośniewski analyzes some ideas of the participation in architecture, an example of which is Giancarlo De Carlo who, together with his students, designed a medical campus at the University of Louvain (Belgium) and Lucien Kroll who was convinced that architecture can gain back its credibility only by way of participation. The article also quotes arguments of Markus Meissen, who created a conflict interpretation of the participation and stated that participation should be used in a limited amount. The second part of this article focuses on two kinds of the participation: passive and active. The first one relies on taking part in the process of planning (from making remarks to local zoning plans to multi-stage public consultations). Although formally each citizen has a right to do so, enforcing that is hard and often inefficient. That’s why citizen initiatives seem to little change this status quo. At the same time local authorities take steps towards inclusion of citizens into the decision-making process. The second kind of participation (active participation) assumes that citizens take part not only in the process of planning but hey are also engaged (in cooperation with local authorities, non-governmental organizations, architects) in realization of such projects. Active participation is shown by activities of ‘Odblokuj’ Association which developed their projects in Praga-Północ and Targówek districts in Warsaw, and Architecture Collective Assemble (their work in Liverpool was awarded the Turner Prize). Active participation is connected with spontaneous expressions by the citizens (e.g. guerrilla gardening).

Keywords

PL

MIESZKANIEC; PLANOWANIE; PARTYCYPACJA; ARCHITEKTURA/MIASTO

EN

DWELLER; PLANNING; PARTICIPATION; ARCHITECTURE/CITY

• Publisher: Akademia Sztuk Pięknych im. Eugeniusza Gepperta we Wrocławiu
• Journal: DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 21
• Pages: 272-294

Dates

published

2016-11-07

Contributors

author

Prośniewski Błażej

References

• Erbel J., Sadura P. (red.), Partycypacja. Przewodnik „Krytyki Politycznej”, Warszawa, 2012. Gójska A. i in., Konsultacje społeczne w przestrzeni wielkomiejskiej. Ochocki Model DialoguObywatelskiego, Warszawa 2012. Górski R., Anarchitektura – wprowadzenie, [w:] „A-tak. Pismo anarchistyczne”, nr 6, 2002; http://www.rozbrat.org/kultura/przestrzen/50-anarchitektura [dostęp:10.03.2016] Jencks Ch., Kropf K. (red.), Teorie i manifesty architektury współczesnej, Warszawa 2013. Mergler L., Pobłocki K., Wudarski M., Anty-Bezradnik przestrzenny: prawo do miasta w działaniu, Warszawa 2003. Miessen M., Koszmar partycypacji, Warszawa 2013. Rancière J., Nienawiść do demokracji, Warszawa 2008. Świątkowska B. (red.), My i oni. Przestrzenie wspólne i projektowanie dla wspólnoty, Warszawa 2014. Thompson M., Between Boundaries: From Commoning and Guerrilla Gardening to Community Land Trust Development in Liverpool, [w:] “Antipode”, volume 47, issue 4, 2015, pages 1021–1042; http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anti.12154/full [dostęp: 10.03.2016]. „Zoon Politikon”, rocznik naukowy 2012 (3); http://www.decydujmyrazem.pl/files/ Zoon_Politikon_netto_prev.pdf [dostęp: 25.05.2016].

Identifiers

ISSN

1733-1528